Creating a vision for integrating behavioral health in your primary care setting is an important first step in the planning process. Having a clear vision can help keep your organization motivated and on track to your desired state of integration. For instance, your vision might be "to provide seamless, whole-person care that addresses both the physical and mental well-being of every patient," or "to reduce emergency department visits for mental health crises by offering accessible, in-house behavioral health support."
Aim for a clear, shared vision with incentives, resources, and leadership aligned.
Identify staff members to serve on the planning and implementation team. Ensure that the team represents all staff roles to better understand how operational changes will affect everyone involved.
Identify "champions" to lead the team. Successful implementation requires strong champions at both the clinical and leadership levels.1-4
- Clinical Champion: Identify a respected provider who is passionate about integrated care and can drive the clinical vision, engage colleagues, and advocate for the model within the care team.
- Leadership Champion: Secure a champion from practice or health system leadership who has the authority to allocate financial resources, remove barriers, and ensure organizational buy-in and support for the integration efforts. Strong leadership approval and ongoing support, particularly from financial leadership, are crucial for sustainability.
These champions, working collaboratively, will be critical to the success of the implementation efforts. You may find that these roles emerge from existing staff or require specific appointments.
How Others Are Doing It
Grand Valley Health Plan's designated champion promoted, oversaw, and monitored their integration implementation efforts. Read more about how they established operational systems for integration.
Useful Resource(s) for identifying an implementation leader and planning team
It is important for the planning and implementation team to reflect on the desire to achieve changes in the behavioral health aspect of your medical practice. Consider the following questions:
- What is driving you to work on integrating behavioral health now? What problems are you trying to solve? Do you want to address:
- Poor access to behavioral health care for your patients?
- Poor outcomes for common behavioral health or chronic medical conditions?
- A need for assistance with complex psychiatric medication management?
- A need to provide better support for patients with substance use disorders and promote their recovery?
- Unmet social service needs among your patients?
- What resources are available to integrate behavioral health now and in the foreseeable future? Consider personnel, funding, and the capacity of frontline staff to transition to integration.
- Who is feeling distress with the behavioral health aspect of your practice right now? Consider patients, providers, and other staff.
- Who has aspirations for the behavioral health aspect of your practice in the future? What are these aspirations?
Clear, effective communication with all the stakeholders involved may help with this task. Think about how to effectively message the needed changes, following the key elements outlined in this guide for discussing complex care. One useful way to do this is to create a stakeholder map, listing each stakeholder group and what matters to them. Then ask, how does integrated behavioral health care line up with the priorities of key stakeholder groups?
Useful Resource(s) for mapping what matters to stakeholder groups
Implementing integrated care in your practice may require changes to operations, workflows, and staffing. To find out where you, your team, and other staff fall on the continuum, download and complete the Integration Playbook Self-Assessment Checklist (PDF - 405.6 KB).
Support from leadership, providers, and staff is essential to the success of an integrated care program. Depending on the size of your organization, several levels of leadership may impact the success of the program.
- Senior leadership, including chief executive officers, medical directors, behavioral health directors, and other similar executive roles, is important because they can provide direction and broadcast messages about integrated behavioral health care. Resources are often allocated at this level.
- Midlevel operational leaders, including practice managers, nurse managers, behavioral health program coordinators, billing managers, and other similar administrative roles, play a role in acquiring resources and problem-solving during implementation. They are especially critical in helping with issues that may emerge in larger multi-site organizations.
- Frontline clinical and operational leaders help staff adjust to changes in workflow and are involved in solving day-to-day implementation problems.
If your leaders, providers, or staff are asking "Why integrated care?" you will need to garner their buy-in and support by clearly communicating how integrated behavioral health aligns with what matters most to them. Engaging them effectively at this stage will help you with converting them into active champions for integration:
Clinical Benefits:
- Improved Access to and Utilization of Behavioral Healthcare: Integrated behavioral health can increase access to and use of behavioral health services in both primary care and specialty mental healthcare settings.5-7
- Improved Quality of Care: Integrated behavioral health can enhance coordination of care, patient monitoring, and treatment tailoring and increase adherence to evidence-based practices.8-10
- Improved Patient Outcomes: Integrated behavioral health can lead to enhanced access to services, better management of co-occurring conditions, increased treatment adherence, and reduced symptoms.6,8,11-17
Financial Benefits:
- Reduced Healthcare Utilization and Costs: Integrated behavioral health can decrease unnecessary hospitalizations and emergency department visits, lower overall healthcare expenditures for patients with chronic conditions and behavioral health needs, and improve efficiency in primary care settings.9,18-20
- Alignment with Value-Based Care: Integrated behavioral health aligns with the shift towards value-based care (and vice versa) by addressing the co-occurrence of mental and physical health issues and necessitating payment and billing approaches that combine medical and behavioral health benefits into a single payment pool.21-25
- Return on Investment: A 2018 report that Milliman prepared for the American Psychiatric Association(PDF - 0.65 MB) suggests substantial potential cost savings (based on conservative financial models) of $38-68B annually in healthcare expenditures across commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid payers. In a systematic review of 30 studies on the Collaborative Care Model (CoCM), an evidence-based behavioral health integration approach, many studies concluded a cost-effective or cost-neutral impact.26 Several individual practices and health systems have estimated or reported dollar amounts, including:
- A large, private primary care health system: A study examining 25 Kaiser Permanente Washington primary care sites in this large integrated health system found that the cost of implementing evidence-based behavioral health integration strategies, including population-based screening and assessment, amounted to approximately $5 per primary care visit with screening, or $38 per visit where depression, suicidal thoughts, and/or substance use disorders were identified. The study concluded that these implementation costs, when spread across patients screened, were comparable to commonly used diagnostic assessments in primary care.27
- A large, public primary care health system: A budget impact analysis on the CoCM for opioid use disorder (OUD) in a 100,000-member Medicaid system estimated the cost per patient treated with a panel size of 85 at $2,547. With this panel size, the program would approximately breakeven, with about a 14% chance of spending more than $200 per patient and a 14% chance of gaining more than $200 per patient. If the panel size was expanded to 120, the cost per patient declined to $2,145, suggesting a likely positive financial balance (cost savings). The analysis concluded that the costs of a CoCM program are likely to be offset by savings if 25% of OUD patients receive treatment with a panel size of about 85, while achieving better patient outcomes.28
- A large primary care clinic: A study evaluating the implementation of an integrated behavioral health care program with embedded behavioral health providers in a large primary care residency-based Family Medicine outpatient clinic in the Southeast found that, over a one-year period, the average total cost per patient was $5,113 before and $5,462 after exposure to embedded behavioral health providers. The analysis indicated a relatively cost-neutral impact.29
Operational Benefits:
- Increased Patient Satisfaction: Integrated behavioral health fosters greater patient engagement and empowerment, improves communication and collaboration between patient and providers.8,11-13
- Increased Provider Satisfaction: Integrated behavioral health increases provider satisfaction due to better support and resources for the behavioral and emotional aspects of care, especially for high-risk, complex patients.30,31
Systems Benefits:
- Alignment with Whole-Person Care: Integrated behavioral health integrates services for mental health, substance use, and health-related social needs within primary care settings, fosters collaboration among interdisciplinary teams, and emphasizes patient-centered care by tailoring care plans and involving patients in decision-making. These changes are integral to addressing the interconnectedness of mental, physical, and social health needs.32,33
As defined in the Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care Lexicon, integrated behavioral health involves "a practice team of primary care and behavioral health providers working together with patients and families, using a systematic and cost-effective approach, to provide patient-centered care for a defined population. This care may address mental health and substance use conditions, health behaviors (including their contribution to chronic medical illnesses), life stressors and crises, stress-related physical symptoms, and ineffective patterns of health care utilization."34
While thinking about your vision, it is important to understand that there are different integrated care approaches. While various integrated care approaches exist, they all facilitate the six defining functions necessary for effective integrated behavioral health. Think of these functions (described below) as the essential ingredients, and there are different recipes (approaches and models) that you can implement that utilize these ingredients in varying amounts and ways.
Clinical Functions — How Integrated Behavioral Health is Done:
- Teamwork: Care teams draw on a range of behavioral health and primary care expertise and role functions to meet the needs of the practice population. Team members have clearly identified roles, and patients, family, or caregivers are invited to be a part of the team. Coordinated or shared operations, workflows, and practice culture support medical providers and staff providing patient-centered behavioral health care. There is also formal or on-the-job training to function in this way.
- Biopsychosocial Assessment and Care: Instead of separately evaluated, understood, and treated physical and mental health conditions, care teams create shared care plans that integrate physical and behavioral health. These shared care plans are informed by comprehensive biopsychosocial assessments that identify the specific physical health conditions, mental health concerns, substance use issues, and health-related social needs that the plan needs to address. Team members take responsibility for whole-person care and act with knowledge of specific social and environmental challenges that affect health in the communities they serve.
- A Systematic Clinical Approach: Care teams use an explicit and systematic clinical approach to identify members of the clinic population who need or may benefit from integrated behavioral and medical care and at what level of severity or priority. Team members engage in shared decision-making with patients to create a unified care plan in a shared electronic health record that contains assessments and plans for biological/physical, psychological, cultural, social, and organization of care aspects of the patient's health and health care
Organizational Support Functions — How Integrated Behavioral Health is Supported:
- Connections with Served Populations or Communities: The organization actively engages with and understands the needs of its community and patient population, and the community and patients understand the benefits of integrated behavioral health.
- Alignment of Leadership, Operations, and Business Model: There is a shared vision for integrated behavioral health across the organization, and operational systems, management practices, and financial models consistently and reliably support the functions of integrated behavioral health.
- Continuous Collection of Data that Enables Learning from Experience: The organization routinely collects, examines, and reports practice-based quality improvement or program evaluation data and uses that data to improve clinical, patient experience, and provider experience outcomes.
Tools like The Building Blocks of Behavioral Health Integration (PDF - 4.9 MB) from the University of Colorado can help you identify relevant integrated behavioral health functions and implementation strategies.
Integrating behavioral health into your practice involves implementing the defining functions of integrated behavioral health to provide whole-person, patient-centered care. These functions are not tied to a single model or approach but represent essential elements that can be adopted and adapted based on your organization's needs and resources. While various models offer structured frameworks for integration, the focus should be on understanding and implementing the clinical functions in a way that best suits your organization's behavioral health needs and available resources. The local familiarity or acceptability of different approaches may also influence your decision. What works for one organization may not work for another. Many organizations use blended models and approaches, integrating various aspects to meet their unique needs. Rather than viewing these models and approaches as distinct and separate entities, they are exploring how the essential components of each can be integrated into more holistic integrated behavioral health frameworks.35
As you consider the approaches and models below, keep in mind that a range of behavioral health issues may be present in your medical setting. The scope of your integrated behavioral health services will depend on the types of behavioral health issues you encounter and are able to address. Do you want to focus on behavior change counseling for improved health (e.g., diet, stress, and physical activity)? Stress-related symptoms? Substance use problems? Comorbid depression and anxiety? Severe mental illness? Behavioral and emotional aspects of chronic illness? The scope of your integrated behavioral health services will also depend on practical considerations. Are you able to hire behavioral health providers? Do you have available practice space for the additional appointments? Understanding the needs and resources within your medical setting will help you evaluate and select the most suitable approaches for implementing the clinical functions of integrated behavioral health.
Tools like the National Council's Integration Practice Assessment Tool (IPAT) - (PDF - 288 KB) can help you evaluate your practice's readiness and identify relevant functions and implementation strategies.
1. Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH)
The PCBH model integrates behavioral health consultants directly into the primary care team, offering patients rapid access to brief, focused interventions for a wide array of behavioral health and health-related concerns.36-38
- Teamwork: Patient-centered care teams are comprised of a primary care provider (PCP), a behavioral health consultant (BHC), and a psychologist or psychiatrist for consultation, if needed. The PCP is often a physician, PA, or nurse practitioner. The BHC (also referred to as a generalist behavioral health provider) is often a psychologist, psychotherapist, LCSW, or licensed professional counselor (LPC) and can be co-located or remote.
- Biopsychosocial Assessment and Care: The BHC is readily available within the primary care clinic for same-day consultation or brief appointments via a warm hand-off by the referring PCP. BHCs conduct brief, focused assessments to understand the presenting concern and its context.
- A Systematic Clinical Approach: The BHC offers support and brief behavioral health interventions for clinic patients, often using focused (15-30 minute) exam room visits to assist with specific symptoms or functional improvement. Care plans are developed collaboratively with the PCP and patient. The BHC and PCP may meet formally after each patient's first visit to discuss the shared care plan. Both the BHC and PCP follow up with each patient until functioning or symptoms begin improving, with the BHC offering longer appointments with the patient after the initial warm hand-off, when necessary. Once the patient improves, the PCP may resume sole oversight of care but can re-engage the BHC at any time, as needed. Patients not improving are referred to the psychologist or psychiatrist for consultation or to a higher level of care. If that is not possible, the BHC may continue to assist until improvements are noted.
Evidence from randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews indicates that PCBH improves coping strategies, adherence to recovery planning, and medication use in adults with depression,13 depression symptoms and mental health functioning in veterans,39 and healthcare utilization across various populations, although its impact on overall health status compared to other active treatments is not significantly different.5 Emerging evidence suggests PCBH results in improvements in functioning, depression, and anxiety in adults;5 weight, BMI, and tobacco use in adults;40 and chronic pain in veterans.41 PCBH may also reduce visits in pediatric emergency departments and pediatric primary care practices.42,43
Read more about Primary Care Behavioral Health at the American Psychological Association.
2. Collaborative Care Model (CoCM)
CoCM integrates behavioral health treatment within primary care using a team-based approach and emphasizes measurement-based care, algorithmic treatment adjustments, systematic follow-up using patient registries, and stepped care based on patient progress.44,45
- Teamwork: The care team includes a PCP, a behavioral health care manager (BHCM), and a psychiatric consultant. The BHCM, often a social worker or psychologist trained in care coordination and brief behavioral health interventions, facilitates communication among all team members and acts as the lead contact person for the patient once introduced via a warm hand-off or referral by the PCP.
- Biopsychosocial Assessment and Care: The BHCM or PCP, often a physician, PA, or nurse practitioner, administers the screening and assessment tools and implements brief behavioral health interventions. The PCP oversees all aspects of the treatment plan including prescribing medication. The psychiatric consultant, often a psychiatrist or PA or APRN with psychiatric training, triages patients and creates a treatment plan with medication recommendations for the PCP (usually without seeing the patient).
- A Systematic Clinical Approach: The entire care team uses patient registries in conjunction with electronic health records to manage caseloads and track patient outcomes. The psychiatric consultant and BHCM also meet regularly to conduct a systematic caseload review, during which they use the patient registry to consider the entire caseload, identify select patients for individual case reviews, and adjust treatment for those patients who are not improving as expected. The psychiatric consultant may also suggest treatment modifications, in-person consultations, or specialty mental health services for clinically challenging patients.
Robust evidence from a systematic review of 79 RCTs and a meta-analysis of over 20,000 patients demonstrates that CoCM leads to significantly greater improvement in outcomes for adults with depression and anxiety compared to usual care.11,46 Several meta-analyses and systematic reviews show that CoCM is also effective for depression, anxiety, or behavioral problems in older adults,47-49 racial/ethnic minorities,50 women,47 adults without insurance,47 and children and adoelscents.12,51 CoCM remains effective when delivered remotely via telehealth communication.52-54 It also shows promise in improving pain-related outcomes and addressing opioid-related behaviors,55 and decreasing depressive symptoms in patients with multimorbidity involving depression and either cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or pain.56
Read more about Collaborative Care at the AIMS Center at the University of Washington.
As you consider integrating behavioral health, focus on the clinical functions outlined above and how they align with your organization's behavioral health needs, available resources, and community context. The described models offer different ways to implement these functions, but you have the flexibility to pick and choose the elements that best fit your unique circumstances.35,57-59
Useful Resources for Considering Integrated Care Approaches
If you have not done so already, define your vision for integrated care in your setting. Creating a formal vision statement can help. This vision statement should clearly communicate your purpose and goals. You may need a short sentence or several sentences to capture your goals for integrated care. The following questions can help guide the development of your vision:
- What is your desired future state? What things are different in your desired future state compared to now?
- Outline how this future state will align with the priorities of senior leadership, mid-level operational leaders, and frontline clinical and operational leaders.
- Who will be affected by the vision?
- Outline the expected benefit for the identified patients and how care will be different for them.
- Outline the expected benefit for the providers/staff and how operations will be different.
- What outcomes do you expect? How can you measure these outcomes (e.g., clinical outcomes, patient experience, cost, and utilization)?
- Are there any measures in place that can evaluate the things you expect to change and the overall success of your behavioral health vision?
- How will you measure the reach of behavioral health services and processes (e.g., referrals, productivity, appointment no-shows)?
- Which of the defining functions of integrated behavioral health will be prioritized in your vision?
- What is your scope of services (e.g., behavior change counseling, stress-related symptoms, substance use, severe mental illness) and anticipated approach (e.g., PCBH, CoCM, or a blended model), and how will their implementation be measured?
- How will you measure the effectiveness of your chosen scope of services and approach?
Here are some examples of vision statements:
Our primary care practice has the capacity to:
- Address and resolve comorbid behavioral health and medical symptoms with better patient experiences and lower cost than before, including patients with complicated, high-cost conditions.
- Proactively identify patients who need well-integrated behavioral health and medical care using targeted screening, health system data, or other methods.
- Deliver targeted behavioral health services for selected, at-risk populations that have been identified.
- Support medical team recognition, assessment, and treatment of uncomplicated behavioral health issues with a behavioral health provider available for consultation to achieve "treat-to-target" goals.
- Manage or control total primary care costs through well-integrated services and population health management methods.
- Expand and diversify behavioral health services and community connections to eventually meet prevalence-based behavioral health needs in the community.
Useful Resources for developing a vision
Identify Your Champions
The AIMS Center offers guidance on identifying an implementation leader and planning team for a collaborative care program.
Stakeholder Map—What Matters to Whom
You can use this template to map what matters to various stakeholder groups.
Economic Impact of Integrated Medical-Behavioral Healthcare: Implications for Psychiatry
Readiness Assessment & Developing Project Aims
Part 3 (“Assessing Organizational Culture for Change”) offers guidance on building a culture for quality improvement.
Collaborative Care
Collaborative Care for People with Depression and Anxiety
Blending Behavioral Health into Primary Care at Cherokee Health Systems
Parinda Khatri, PhD, the Chief Clinical Officer at Cherokee Health Systems, describes how behavioral health consultants work as core members of the systems’ primary care teams.
Medicaid Health Home Implementation in Missouri: A Year Later
Intermountain Healthcare
Intermountain Healthcare promotes behavioral health integration through its own in-house ambulatory and hospital-based information technology systems.
Massachusetts Child Psychiatry Access Project (MCPAP) Web site
This Web site provides information about MCPAP, related tools, and resources.
Integrated Models of Behavioral Health in Primary Care
SAMHSA-HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions provides external linkages to information about different approaches to behavioral health integration.
Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration in Primary Care
The Collaborative Care Model: An Approach for Integrating Physical and Mental Health Care in Medicaid Health Homes
The DIAMOND Initiative: Implementing Collaborative Care for Depression in 75 Primary Care Clinics
Developing and Communicating a Vision
Creating a Shared Vision for Collaborative Care
This brief document outlines the steps in creating a vision for collaborative care.
Leadership in Systems of Care: Creating and Communicating a Shared Vision
1. Wood K, Giannopoulos V, Louie E, et al. The role of clinical champions in facilitating the use of evidence-based practice in drug and alcohol and mental health settings: A systematic review. Implement Res Pract. 2020;1:2633489520959072. doi:10.1177/2633489520959072
2. Peer Y, Koren A. Facilitators and barriers for implementing the integrated behavioural health care model in the USA: An integrative review. doi:10.1111/inm.13027
3. Godoy L, Gordon S, Druskin L, Long M, Kelly KP, Beers L. Pediatric Provider Experiences with Implementation of Routine Mental Health Screening. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2021;42(1):32-40. doi:10.1097/dbp.0000000000000844
4. Nguyen AM, Klege RA, Menders T, Verma C, Marcello S, Crabtree BF. Strategies for Implementing Integrated Behavioral Health into Health Centers. J Am Board Fam Med JABFM. 2025;37(5):833-846. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230417R1
5. Possemato K, Johnson EM, Beehler GP, et al. Patient outcomes associated with primary care behavioral health services: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2018;53:1-11. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.04.002
6. Campo JV, Geist R, Kolko DJ. Integration of Pediatric Behavioral Health Services in Primary Care: Improving Access and Outcomes with Collaborative Care. Can J Psychiatry. 2018;63(7):432-438. doi:10.1177/0706743717751668
7. McHugh C, Hu N, Georgiou G, et al. Integrated care models for youth mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2024;58(9):747-759. doi:10.1177/00048674241256759
8. Thota AB, Sipe TA, Byard GJ, et al. Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):525-538. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019
9. Reiss-Brennan B, Brunisholz KD, Dredge C, et al. Association of Integrated Team-Based Care With Health Care Quality, Utilization, and Cost. JAMA. 2016;316(8):826-834. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11232
10. Woltmann E, Grogan-Kaylor A, Perron B, Georges H, Kilbourne AM, Bauer MS. Comparative effectiveness of collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions across primary, specialty, and behavioral health care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(8):790-804. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111616
11. Archer J, Bower P, Gilbody S, et al. Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(10):CD006525. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006525.pub2
12. Asarnow JR, Rozenman M, Wiblin J, Zeltzer L. Integrated Medical-Behavioral Care Compared With Usual Primary Care for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(10):929-937. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1141
13. Robinson P, Von Korff M, Bush T, Lin EHB, Ludman EJ. The impact of primary care behavioral health services on patient behaviors: A randomized controlled trial. Fam Syst Health. 2020;38(1):6-15. doi:10.1037/fsh0000474
14. Druss BG, von Esenwein SA, Glick GE, et al. Randomized Trial of an Integrated Behavioral Health Home: The Health Outcomes Management and Evaluation (HOME) Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(3):246-255. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16050507
15. Cully JA, Stanley MA, Petersen NJ, et al. Delivery of Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Medically Ill Patients in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(9):1014-1024. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4101-3
16. Balasubramanian BA, Cohen DJ, Jetelina KK, et al. Outcomes of Integrated Behavioral Health with Primary Care. J Am Board Fam Med JABFM. 2017;30(2):130-139. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160234
17. Hostutler CA, Shahidullah JD, Mautone JA, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pediatric integrated primary care for the prevention and treatment of physical and behavioral health conditions. J Pediatr Psychol. Published online 2024. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsae038
18. Jacob V, Chattopadhyay SK, Sipe TA, et al. Economics of collaborative care for management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):539-549. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.011
19. Ross KM, Klein B, Ferro K, McQueeney DA, Gernon R, Miller BF. The Cost Effectiveness of Embedding a Behavioral Health Clinician into an Existing Primary Care Practice to Facilitate the Integration of Care: A Prospective, Case-Control Program Evaluation. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2019;26(1):59-67. doi:10.1007/s10880-018-9564-9
20. Beil H, Feinberg RK, Patel SV, Romaire MA. Behavioral Health Integration With Primary Care: Implementation Experience and Impacts From the State Innovation Model Round 1 States. Milbank Q. 2019;97(2):543-582. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12379
21. Shmerling AC, Gold SB, Gilchrist EC, Miller BF. Integrating behavioral health and primary care: a qualitative analysis of financial barriers and solutions. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(3):648-656. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz026
22. Rotenstein LS, Edwards ST, Landon BE. Adult Primary Care Physician Visits Increasingly Address Mental Health Concerns. Health Aff Millwood. 2023;42(2):163-171. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00705
23. Ramanuj P, Ferenchik E, Docherty M, Spaeth-Rublee B, Pincus HA. Evolving Models of Integrated Behavioral Health and Primary Care. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21(1):4. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0985-4
24. Kathol RG, deGruy F, Rollman BL. Value-Based Financially Sustainable Behavioral Health Components in Patient-Centered Medical Homes. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):172-175. doi:10.1370/afm.1619
25. van Hoorn ES, Ye L, van Leeuwen N, Raat H, Lingsma HF. Value-Based Integrated Care: A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8038. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8038
26. Jacob V, Chattopadhyay SK, Sipe TA, Thota AB, Byard GJ, Chapman DP. Economics of Collaborative Care for Management of Depressive Disorders: A Community Guide Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42(5):539-549. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.011
27. Yeung K, Richards J, Goemer E, et al. Costs of using evidence-based implementation strategies for behavioral health integration in a large primary care system. Health Serv Res. 2020;55(6):913-923. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13592
28. Lee CM, Scheuter C, Rochlin D, Platchek T, Kaplan RM. A Budget Impact Analysis of the Collaborative Care Model for Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(9):1693-1694. doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04998-5
29. Koehler AN, Ip E, Davis SW, et al. Cost Analysis of Integrated Behavioral Health in a Large Primary Care Practice. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022;29(2):446-452. doi:10.1007/s10880-022-09866-9
30. Holmes A, Chang YP. Effect of mental health collaborative care models on primary care provider outcomes: an integrative review. Fam Pr. 2022;39(5):964-970. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmac026
31. Levine S, Unützer J, Yip JY, et al. Physicians' satisfaction with a collaborative disease management program for late-life depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2005;27(6):383-391. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.06.001
32. Peer Y, Koren A. Facilitators and barriers for implementing the integrated behavioural health care model in the USA: An integrative review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022;31(6):1300-1314. doi:10.1111/inm.13027
33. Menear M, Girard A, Dugas M, Gervais M, Gilbert M, Gagnon MP. Personalized care planning and shared decision making in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0268649. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268649
34. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Lexicon for Behavioral Health Integration with Primary Care. March 2024. Accessed April 4, 2025. https://integrationacademy.ahrq.gov/products/ibh-lexicon
35. Kallenberg GA, Sieber WJ. "Integrated behavioral health plus": The best of the worlds of collaborative care management, primary care behavioral health, and primary care. Fam Syst Health. 2024;42(3):454-463. doi:10.1037/fsh0000885
36. Funderburk JS, Polaha J, Beehler GP. What is the recipe for PCBH? Proposed resources, processes, and expected outcomes. Fam Syst Health. 2021;39(4):551-562. doi:10.1037/fsh0000669
37. Goodie JL, Hunter CL, Dobmeyer AC. Optimising and personalising behavioural healthcare in the US Department of Defense through Primary Care Behavioral Health. BMJ Mil Health. 2024;170(5):420-424. doi:10.1136/military-2022-002312
38. Funderburk JS, Wray LO, Martin J, Maisto SA. How do models of integrated primary care work? A proposed model for mechanisms of change using primary care behavioral health. Psychol Serv. 2024;21(3):569-580. doi:10.1037/ser0000871
39. Funderburk JS, Pigeon WR, Shepardson RL, et al. Treating depressive symptoms among veterans in primary care: A multi-site RCT of brief behavioral activation. J Affect Disord. 2021;283:11-19. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.033
40. Nyman SJ, Vogel ME, Heller GM, Hella JR, Illes RA, Kirkpatrick HA. Development and Evaluation of a Health Behavior Change Clinic in Primary Care: An Interdisciplinary Partnership. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2023;30(4):909-923. doi:10.1007/s10880-023-09945-5
41. Beehler GP, Loughran TA, King PR, et al. Patients' perspectives of brief cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain: Treatment satisfaction, perceived utility, and global assessment of change. Fam Syst Health. 2021;39(2):351-357. doi:10.1037/fsh0000606
42. Dopp AR, Smith AB, Dueweke AR, Bridges AJ. Cost-Savings Analysis of Primary Care Behavioral Health in a Pediatric Setting: Implications for Provider Agencies and Training Programs. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2018;6(2):129-139. doi:10.1037/cpp0000231
43. Maeng DD, Poleshuck E, Rosenberg T, et al. Primary Care Behavioral Health Integration and Care Utilization: Implications for Patient Outcome and Healthcare Resource Use. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(11):2691-2697. doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07372-6
44. Clinical Update: Collaborative Mental Health Care for Children and Adolescents in Pediatric Primary Care. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023;62(2):91-119. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2022.06.007
45. Yonek J, Lee CM, Harrison A, Mangurian C, Tolou-Shams M. Key Components of Effective Pediatric Integrated Mental Health Care Models: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(5):487-498. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0023
46. Schillok H, Gensichen J, Panagioti M, et al. Effective Components of Collaborative Care for Depression in Primary Care: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. Published online March 26, 2025. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0183
47. Hernandez V, Nasser L, Do C, Lee WC. Healing the Whole: An International Review of the Collaborative Care Model between Primary Care and Psychiatry. Healthc Basel. 2024;12(16). doi:10.3390/healthcare12161679
48. Shulman R, Arora R, Geist R, et al. Integrated Community Collaborative Care for Seniors with Depression/Anxiety and any Physical Illness. Can Geriatr J. 2021;24(3):251-257. doi:10.5770/cgj.24.473
49. Tops L, Beerten SG, Vandenbulcke M, Vermandere M, Deschodt M. Integrated Care Models for Older Adults with Depression and Physical Comorbidity: A Scoping Review. Int J Integr Care. 2024;24(1):1. doi:10.5334/ijic.7576
50. Hu J, Wu T, Damodaran S, Tabb KM, Bauer A, Huang H. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Care on Depression Outcomes for Racial/Ethnic Minority Populations in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Psychosomatics. 2020;61(6):632-644. doi:10.1016/j.psym.2020.03.007
51. Burkhart K, Asogwa K, Muzaffar N, Gabriel M. Pediatric Integrated Care Models: A Systematic Review. Clin Pediatr Phila. 2020;59(2):148-153. doi:10.1177/0009922819890004
52. Carleton KE, Patel UB, Stein D, Mou D, Mallow A, Blackmore MA. Enhancing the scalability of the collaborative care model for depression using mobile technology. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(3):573-579. doi:10.1093/tbm/ibz146
53. Moon K, Sobolev M, Kane JM. Digital and Mobile Health Technology in Collaborative Behavioral Health Care: Scoping Review. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(2):e30810. doi:10.2196/30810
54. Whitfield J, LePoire E, Stanczyk B, Ratzliff A, Cerimele JM. Remote Collaborative Care With Off-Site Behavioral Health Care Managers: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. 2022;63(1):71-85. doi:10.1016/j.jaclp.2021.07.012
55. Heavey SC, Bleasdale J, Rosenfeld EA, Beehler GP. Collaborative Care Models to Improve Pain and Reduce Opioid Use in Primary Care: a Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(13):3021-3040. doi:10.1007/s11606-023-08343-9
56. Kappelin C, Carlsson AC, Wachtler C. Specific content for collaborative care: A systematic review of collaborative care interventions for patients with multimorbidity involving depression and/or anxiety in primary care. Fam Pract. 2022;39(4):725-734. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmab079
57. Unützer, J. All Hands on Deck. Psychiatr News. 2016;51(5):1-1. doi:10.1176/appi.pn.2016.3a28
58. Jones A, Bertsch K, Petrides J, Lilienthal K, Vermeulen M. Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care: A Review of Evidence and Recommendations for Osteopathic Family Practice. Osteopath Fam Physician. 2024;16(1). doi:10.33181/16106
59. American Psychological Association Center for Psychology and Health. Behavioral Health Services in Primary Care: An Essential Component of Integrated Care. Accessed April 24, 2025. https://www.apa.org/health/behavioral-health-services-primary-care.pdf