Tracking individual patient outcomes — that is, any changes in the patient's condition or results of treatment — is standard of care for primary care providers regardless of how notes are documented. For example, you already monitor elements such as weight, blood pressure, lab values, and medications to determine whether and how to modify their treatment.
Aggregating outcomes for all your patients with similar conditions can help you understand areas of success and challenges. This aggregation can be done for any condition (e.g., high blood pressure, depression, diabetes, OUD), and/or patients who are receiving annual physicals.
You may already have a registry — an electronic system that aggregates these records. Some electronic health records (EHRs) have a built-in registry function. If not, adding this component may be more practical for larger practices that provide more comprehensive, whole-person treatment for OUD or conduct clinical research.
Providers regularly monitor patient progress and response to treatment (potentially every visit) and adjust the treatment approach if progress is not occurring. Providers maintain an electronic care registry and use it to facilitate treatment planning for individual patients and to improve practice quality over time.
You already record patient outcomes, such as blood pressure or weight. If you are just starting to treat people with medications for OUD, you may be interested in adding one or more of the outcomes listed below, under Treatment Retention. If your practice offers more comprehensive, whole-person services for OUD, you may choose to collect more extensive data including standardized measures.
Common patient outcomes and standardized measures for OUD treatment are described below. These include treatment retention, abstinence or reduced substance use, progress toward the patient's treatment goals, and indicators of mental health and quality of life.
Treatment Retention. Treatment retention is one of the most important outcomes to track. Longer treatment with medications for OUD is associated with significantly better outcomes across a range of life areas, such as:
- Decreased opioid-related overdoses,1,2emergency department visits, and mortality;3
- Reduced polysubstance use;4
- Increased abstinence;1,5,6
- Improved overall health;6
- Decreased arrests;7
- Improved employment;8
- Family restoration;9
- Decreased legal system involvement;8 and
- Improved quality of life.10
There is a lack of consensus in the field regarding minimum treatment duration, with some suggesting 12 months11 and others reporting better results for even longer periods of treatment.12 However, about half of those who discontinue treatment do so within the first 30 days of starting treatment.13-16 As addiction is a complex and recurring disorder, a high proportion of people who discontinue treatment re-enter treatment at a later date.17
Treatment retention is a simple concept, but it can be confusing to measure since both practice admission and discharge/cessation can be ambiguous. A simple option is to:
- Admission can be defined as the first receipt of (or prescription for) medication for OUD from your practice. Ideally, the interval between first contact and medication is as brief as possible18,19
- Discharge can be defined as the last patient contact related to treating their OUD. Depending on your practice's approach to treatment, other outcomes may be more important to track. A common convention is to count a 30-day interruption of MOUD as a discharge/cessation, even if the patient later re-enters treatment.
Treatment retention rates are typically reported for a specified period. The most critical retention rates to monitor are 30 days and 1 year. If possible, consider measuring 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, 6-month, and 1-year retention rates.
To calculate retention rates — or the percentage of patients who stay in treatment over a specific timeframe — you can use the following formula:20
Where:
- E = Total number of patients who remain in treatment at the end of the period
- N = Number of new patients admitted during the period
- S = Number of patients in treatment at the beginning of the period
For example, if you started with 100 patients (S), ended with 100 patients (E), and gained 10 new patients (N), the retention rate would be:
This metric allows you to determine mean treatment retention over a specific timeframe. Retention rates reflect the effectiveness of treatment programs by indicating both care stability and the likelihood of continued patient participation, which are essential for assessing care quality and long-term recovery outcomes.21,22
To truly measure therapeutic success, however, consider treatment retention as well as other clinical and quality of life outcome measures.23
Continued Substance Use: Continuing to use drugs, such as opioids and other substances, or a recurrence of use is an important gauge of patient progress. Patients who use illicit substances are not "failing" treatment; they may just need changes to their treatment plan. It is also possible that patients who continue to use may need additional services, such as more visits or counseling, or a higher level of care.24 Either way, continued substance use is not a reason to discontinue providing medications for OUD because the primary goal of MOUD is to keep people alive by reducing risk of overdose.25
At each visit, check for substance use, including alcohol and nicotine. A urine drug screen can be more accurate than patient self-report, as some patients do not want to disappoint their provider by disclosing use.26 Your nonjudgemental manner can help strengthen communication with your patients. Learn more in Challenging Patient Behaviors or Concerns and Prevention and Response to Recurrence of Use.
Note. The rest of this module may be more practical for larger practices that are able to provide more comprehensive whole-person treatment of people with OUD, or for practices that conduct clinical research.
Patients' Treatment Goals: Progress toward patients' personal goals are useful to monitor, although they may be more subjective or harder to measure. Examples of measurable goals are:
- Attendance at appointments: Missed appointments may indicate the patient is struggling, using opioids or other substances, or facing logistical issues, such as lack of childcare or transportation. Telehealth may be an effective workaround for some logistical issues, but it may not be feasible or available due to Internet access, privacy, etc. Take a person-centered approach to identify the issues and seek solutions.
- Patient's priority goal(s): It is important for patients to set goals for themselves such as reuniting with children or family, stable housing, or enrollment or retention in a job or school. These goals may be the most motivating and rewarding to patients, which may help them stay in treatment longer.27
- External supports: Practices with a more comprehensive array of services for people with OUD can also measure engagement with behavioral health services or external recovery supports.
Mental Health Symptoms: As relevant for individual patients, monitor symptoms of comorbid depression, PTSD, or anxiety symptoms, which can affect patients' management of OUD and their quality of life. (Discussed in Counseling and Psychosocial Supports.) Where feasible, consider using validated28 tools to measure and track symptoms of:
- Depression: Data Element: Patient Health Questionnaire 9 item (PHQ-9) total score [Reported] (2001) — includes a suicide risk screening item and or 2-item version: Form: Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) (2015) without the suicide risk screening item;
- Anxiety: Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item (GAD-2) - Mental Health Screening - National HIV Curriculum (n.d.) — GAD-7 and PHQ available from the same website; and
- Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): (PCL-5) PTSD Checklist for DSM5.pdf (2013)29 — 20-item screener for PTSD that can be used to track PTSD symptoms over time. This scoring template was posted by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). For scoring, the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) — Scoring Guide is posted by the Canadian ADHD Resource Alliance (CADDRA).
Life Improvement. You can monitor life improvement relative to addictions treatment using tools such as:
- The 4-item Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA) asks patients to rate their substance use, health, lifestyle, and community along a 10-point scale;
- The Short Inventory of Problems Revised (SIP-R) (PDF - 26.1 KB) has 17 items that assess a patient's physical, social, intrapersonal, interpersonal, and impulse control issues; and
- Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) With Scoring & Clinical Guidelines (111 KB) includes 17 questions about physical health, sleep, mood, substance use, spirituality, employment, finances, social and familial support, and recovery goals.
Recovery capital refers to the probability of a patient having a successful recovery based on the breadth of recovery supports they receive and the extent to which their recovery needs are met. For more information on this construct see: The science of recovery capital: Where do we go from here? | PMC. This article describes two measures of recovery capital:
- The Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital-10 (BARC-10) — 10 items measuring physical dependence, emotional dependence, and loss of control to identify what additional supports the patient needs; and
- The Recovery Capital (REC-CAP) — a comprehensive assessment of a patient's recovery.
General Functioning and Quality of Life. A patient's quality of life, life satisfaction, and general functioning are important to recovery. Improvements in these can be tracked and monitored to assess the patient's progress over time. Several instruments assess quality of life, but none specifically address those with OUD. The instruments vary widely in terms of content and administrator or respondent burden. Examples include:
- WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life | The World Health Organization — general quality of life measure in multiple languages;
- Dartmouth COOP Charts — general functioning primary care settings: (may require a fee); and
- Additional measures to assess well-being and life satisfaction, as well as physical, mental, and social health are linked in the HealthMeasures database.
Note. This section may be more practical for larger practices that provide more comprehensive, whole-person treatment for OUD or for practices that conduct clinical research.
There is a good chance that you already use some form of electronic system for patient data, whether it is an EHR, patient registry, or another type of database. Most office-based physicians use an EHR system (88.2% in 2021)30 which facilitates monitoring of patient care and coordinating care with other providers.
Many newer EHR systems have the capacity to aggregate multiple patient records and analyze patient outcomes. The same is true for many patient registries and other datasets.
Even if your practice does not use an electronic system that allows for simple aggregation of patient data, it may be possible to:
- Create a basic spreadsheet that includes the data elements you wish to monitor;
- Access patient data in electronic form that can be downloaded into a spreadsheet (e.g., Excel) for analysis. This data may be maintained by office or paraprofessional staff. For example, your practice may maintain a billing dataset that includes diagnosis, dates of service, service provided, and type of payor; and
- Private centers may offer tracking systems and courses for free or for a fee. For example, the AIMS Center of the University of Washington has developed a Care Management Tracking System and other resources for registries to support collaborative healthcare.
- Don't forget to consider a patient's personal definition of "success" as a critical outcome. Using motivational interviewing to identify and remind patients of why THEY want to be in treatment (and return if they have used again) is a very important part of the process of treating OUD and supporting patients to achieve recovery.
- Don't treat continued substance use or missed appointments as treatment failures or reasons to "fire" a patient from treatment, but rather as a call to revise the individualized shared care plan.
1. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Facing Addiction in America: The Surgeon General's Spotlight on Opioids. NIDA. 2019. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://nida.nih.gov/nidamed-medical-health-professionals/opioid-crisis-pain-management/facing-addiction-in-america-surgeon-generals-spotlight-opioids
2. Burns M, Tang L, Chang CCH, et al. Duration of medication treatment for opioid-use disorder and risk of overdose among Medicaid enrollees in 11 states: a retrospective cohort study. Addiction. 2022;117(12):3079-3088. doi:10.1111/add.15959
3. Ma J, Bao YP, Wang RJ, et al. Effects of medication-assisted treatment on mortality among opioids users: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(12):1868-1883. doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0094-5
4. Tsui JI, Mayfield J, Speaker EC, et al. Association between methamphetamine use and retention among patients with opioid use disorders treated with buprenorphine. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2020;109:80-85. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.10.005
5. Greiner MG, Shulman M, Scodes J, et al. Patient Characteristics Associated with Opioid Abstinence after Participation in a Trial of Buprenorphine versus Injectable Naltrexone. Subst Use Misuse. 2022;57(11):1732-1742. doi:10.1080/10826084.2022.2112230
6. Wakeman SE, Larochelle MR, Ameli O, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Different Treatment Pathways for Opioid Use Disorder. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1920622. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20622
7. Dever JA, Hertz MF, Dunlap LJ, et al. The Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Study: Methods and Initial Outcomes From an 18-Month Study of Patients in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. Public Health Rep. 2024;139(4):484-493. doi:10.1177/00333549231222479
8. Stahler GJ, Mennis J. The effect of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on residential treatment completion and retention in the US. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2020;212:108067. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108067
9. Sanger N, Panesar B, Dennis M, et al. The Inclusion of Patients Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review. PROM. 2022;13:113-130. doi:10.2147/PROM.S297699
10. Dever JA, Hertz MF, Dunlap LJ, et al. The Medications for Opioid Use Disorder Study: Methods and Initial Outcomes From an 18-Month Study of Patients in Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. Public Health Rep. 2024;139(4):484-493. doi:10.1177/00333549231222479
11. Schuckit MA. Treatment of Opioid-Use Disorders. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):357-368. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1604339
12. Hser YI, Evans E, Grella C, Ling W, Anglin D. Long-term course of opioid addiction. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2015;23(2):76-89. doi:10.1097/HRP.0000000000000052
13. Krawczyk N, Williams AR, Saloner B, Cerdá M. Who stays in medication treatment for opioid use disorder? A national study of outpatient specialty treatment settings. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2021;126:108329. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108329
14. National Quality Forum. Behavioral Health 2016-2017 Final Report. NQF. 2017. Accessed May 1, 2025. https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2017/08/Behavioral_Health_2016-2017_Final_Report.aspx
15. Greiner MG, Shulman M, Choo TH, et al. Naturalistic follow-up after a trial of medications for opioid use disorder: Medication status, opioid use, and relapse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2021;131:108447. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108447
16. Cooper RL, Edgerton RD, Watson J, et al. Meta-analysis of primary care delivered buprenorphine treatment retention outcomes. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2023;49(6):756-765. doi:10.1080/00952990.2023.2251653
17. Fishman M, Vo HT, Burgower R, et al. Treatment Trajectories During and After a Medication Trial for Opioid Use Disorder: Moving from Research as Usual to Treatment as Usual. J Addict Med. 2020;14(4):331-336. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000592
18. University of Wisconsin-Madison. NIATx. NIATx. 2025. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://niatx.wisc.edu/
19. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Strengthening Treatment Access and Retention-State Implementation Program (STAR-SI): NIATx State Diffusion Model. Presented at: 2006. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://chess.wisc.edu/niatx/////////////StarSI/mm06/STAR-SI_NIATx_State_Diffusion_Model_11.6.06.pdf
20. Hansei Solutions. Healthcare Patient Retention: Importance, Strategies, & Calculation. Hansei Solutions. 2023. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://hanseisolutions.com/healthcare-patient-retention-importance-strategies-calculation/
21. Williams AR, Mauro CM, Feng T, et al. Performance Measurement for Opioid Use Disorder Medication Treatment and Care Retention. AJP. 2023;180(6):454-457. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20220456
22. Lander LR, Zheng W, Hustead JD, et al. Long-term treatment retention in West Virginia's comprehensive opioid addiction treatment (COAT) program. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020;411. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2020.116712
23. Dacosta-Sánchez D, González-Ponce BM, Fernández-Calderón F, Sánchez-García M, Lozano OM. Retention in treatment and therapeutic adherence: How are these associated with therapeutic success? An analysis using real-world data. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2022;31(4):e1929. doi:10.1002/mpr.1929
24. Chambers L, Hallowell B, Zullo A, et al. Buprenorphine Dose and Time to Discontinuation Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder in the Era of Fentanyl. JAMA Network Open. 2023;6(9). doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34540
25. American Society of Addiction Medicine. The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: 2020 Focused Update. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 2020;14(2S):1-91. doi:10.1097/ADM.0000000000000633
26. Bagley SM, Cheng DM, Winter M, et al. Opioid and cocaine use among primary care patients on buprenorphine-Self-report and urine drug tests. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;192:245-249. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.010
27. Hohmeier KC, Cernasev A, Leibold C, et al. Patient reported goals for medications for opioid use disorder: A theory of proximal goal attainment. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023;12:100345. doi:10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100345
28. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Screening and Assessment Tools Chart. SAMHSA. 2025. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://www.samhsa.gov/resource/dbhis/screening-assessment-tools-chart
29. Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T, Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P, Schnurr, P. P. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) — Standard [Measurement instrument]. Published online 2023. Accessed May 29, 2025. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/documents/PCL5_Standard_form.PDF
30. CDC. 2021 National Electronic Health Records Survey public use file national weighted estimates. Published online 2021. Accessed April 29, 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nehrs/2021NEHRS-PUF-weighted-estimates-508.pdf