Literature Collection

Rates of clinical anxiety have increased during COVID and post-quarantine in youth, with older adolescent girls and youth with minorized racial, gender, and sexuality identities most vulnerable. Given that increased anxiety to a threatening/uncertain environment is adaptive, it is important to conceptualize anxiety from a balanced perspective, evaluating its functionality. For adolescents continuing to struggle with re-integration into their social environments and school avoidance, an exposure framework is necessary to encourage approach behaviors to recalibrate the social environment as safe. Disproportion between demand for services and available providers increased greatly due to the pandemic. Evidence-based treatments for anxiety can be delivered via telehealth, in school, or in primary care settings.

INTRODUCTION: The integration of services is often driven by the belief that integration will lead to better outcomes for service users. However, there is a paucity of robust evidence exploring the relationship between integration and outcomes. This study sought to determine whether the integration of health and social care services via Health and Social Care Partnerships has led to a measurable change in outcomes for Scotland's children and young people. METHODS: Multilevel models were applied to routinely collected administrative data to determine whether different approaches to structural integration were related to changes in a range of outcomes for children and young people. The modelling approach accounted for confounding factors such as economic conditions and the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: The analysis found no consistent evidence of an association between the structural integration of services and changes in outcomes for children and young people. However, external factors such as deprivation and the COVID-19 pandemic were found to be linked to changes in outcomes across various areas of children's lives. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the complexity in attributing changes in outcomes to a specific intervention or reform, particularly in the presence of wider socio-economic factors. Understanding the influence of systems-level change may not be fully possible using routinely collected data alone, and any methods used to assess impact should be underpinned by an underlying theory of change.

This scoping review explores the concepts of integrated healthcare, interprofessional collaboration, and healthcare funding within the context of primary and allied healthcare. A systematic database, internet, and manual search of included article reference lists sought published and gray literature. From an initial 8,122 papers, a total of 63 met the inclusion criteria and were assessed using a three-stage narrative synthesis that sought to meaningfully account for the complexity and heterogeneity of the included papers: (1) Preliminary analysis involved data extraction and mapping of key themes, including article, integration, collaboration, and funding characteristics; (2) Robustness evaluation involved critically appraising the methodological quality of the literature using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool, and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-based Practice Research Evidence Appraisal Tool, and Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool; and (3) Relationship exploration found that most primary and allied healthcare services still operate under fee-for-service funding arrangements that discourage the delivery of integrated collaborative, coordinated, and complex care, instead encouraging traditional siloed and hierarchical approaches that are linked to workload, remuneration, and job satisfaction inequalities between primary and allied healthcare professions. Future research exploring sustainable blended funding models that encourage greater collaboration and integration among primary and allied healthcare is needed.

BACKGROUND: We analyzed early outcomes regarding the impact of our integrated alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) clinic on patients with ALD and alcohol use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with ALD who were evaluated in our integrated clinic from May 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023. Primary outcomes included differences in baseline clinical/demographic data between patients who accepted versus declined an appointment and changes in the severity of ALD, alcohol consumption, functional status, hospital utilization, and remission in alcohol use disorder for evaluated patients. RESULTS: Patients who declined appointments (n=66) had higher median no-show rates (15.0 [8.0,30.0] vs. 8.5 [3.25,15.0], p<0.001), social vulnerability index (0.53 [0.26,0.79] vs. 0.38 [0.17,0.63], p=0.033), and proportions of cirrhosis (78.8% vs. 59.8%, p=0.017) versus evaluated patients. Comparison of baseline to first follow-up visit for evaluated patients (n=102) demonstrated significant reductions in median AST (59.5 [41.75, 89] vs. 44.5 [33.5, 56.25], p<0.001), alanine-aminotransferase (33.5 [20,45.25] vs. 26.5 [18.75,33.0], p=0.017), total bilirubin (1.6 [0.7,3.3] vs. 1 [0.5,1.9], p=0.001), phosphatidylethanol (263 [35, 784] vs. 0 [0, 163], p<0.001), MELD-3.0 and Sodium scores for patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis and cirrhosis (16 [11, 18.75] vs. 12 [9, 14], p<0.001), 14 [9.25, 17.75] vs. 11 [8.5, 14], p<0.001), and Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores for patients with cirrhosis (9 [6, 10.5] vs. 7 [6, 9], p<0.001). The proportion of patients with active-severe alcohol use disorder significantly decreased (85.2% vs. 51.9%, p<0.001). Additionally, patients had significant reductions in emergency department utilization (incidence rate ratio of 0.64 emergency department visits/month (p=0.002) and 0.71 hospital admissions/month (p=0.025). However, after considering the false discovery rate, the reduction in hospitalization admissions/month was not statistically significant (False Discovery Rate adjusted p=0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Our integrated approach led to reductions in liver injury, degree of liver decompensation, alcohol use, and ED utilization, and remission in AUD in a population of both non-transplant ALD and post-transplant patients.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Integrated health management represents a pivotal strategy for enhancing both operational efficiency and the quality of care in hospital environments. This study undertakes a systematic literature review to examine the influence of integrated health management on hospital administration. The principal aim is to synthesise a structured body of knowledge capable of informing strategic clinical decision-making and shaping future research trajectories. METHODS: This investigation employed the Constructivist Knowledge Development Process (ProKnow-C), a methodological framework implemented in four sequential stages: (i) the selection of pertinent peer-reviewed literature to construct a representative portfolio; (ii) bibliometric analysis to evaluate the impact and consistency of sources; (iii) systemic analysis to categorise thematic dimensions; and (iv) the identification of research gaps and prospective avenues for investigation. A total of 20 scholarly articles were scrutinised using both quantitative and qualitative criteria. RESULTS: Three principal approaches to integrated hospital management were identified: (1) the utilisation of management tools-such as the Balanced Scorecard and performance indicators-to improve service delivery efficiency; (2) strategies for performance enhancement, underpinned by strategic planning, detailed operational analysis, and robust internal controls; and (3) financial management approaches, grounded in hospital information systems and evidence-based decision-making. Bibliometric findings confirmed the internal coherence of the selected portfolio, while the systemic analysis demonstrated the presence of shared conceptual frameworks throughout the literature. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review contributed to the consolidation of a structured knowledge base concerning integrated hospital management and highlighted critical areas for future research. Further enquiry is warranted into models for clinical risk mitigation, the optimisation of resource allocation, and the development of financially viable management practices. The ProKnow-C methodology proved robust and suitable for guiding research within the domains of clinical evaluation and healthcare management.