Literature Collection

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a well-established concept of how genes impact medication response, with many studies demonstrating reductions in medication side effects, improved efficacy and cost effectiveness. Despite these benefits, implementation of PGx in daily practice remains limited. Studies on the implementation of PGx in clinical practice have previously found that inadequate knowledge is one of the main barriers. Details regarding specifically which educational needs exist among family medicine clinicians requires further study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify both the perceived role that pharmacogenomics (PGx) could play in primary care practice, the knowledge gaps that family medicine clinicians experience, and the skills they require to use PGx in their daily practice. METHODS: To achieve this aim, the attitudes, knowledge, barriers, skills needed, and preferred educational program were explored in a family medicine clinician focus group study via a semi-structured interview and knowledge quiz. Second, multidisciplinary focus groups provided information on the level of knowledge and necessary skills to use PGx in patient care. After gathering key recorded information from both focus groups, the perceived role pharmacogenomics could possibly play in primary care, the predominant knowledge gaps, and the most appropriate educational program was determined by qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged regarding the PGx educational needs and the role of PGx in family medicine: 1) need for PGx competences, 2) insight into the roles and responsibilities of PGx services, 3) optimization of PGx workflow through artificial intelligence integrated in the electronic health record, and 4) the ethical dilemmas and psychological effects related to PGx. These themes reflect a shift in the role of PGx in family medicine with implications for education. CONCLUSION: The results obtained from this study will help improve the implementation of PGx in daily practice, and consequently, may result in increased utilization of PGx, thereby resulting in improved medication efficacy and reduced side effects.

Introduction: Drug use related deaths are increasing and the lack of effective treatment for psychostimulants can be largely held responsible. Particularly, no pharmacotherapy is approved for methamphetamine (METH) use disorder despite decades of research. Only psychosocial interventions are clinically used, with limited long-term recovery and relapse.Areas covered: This review aims to select and describe the most relevant findings to date. Selected clinical trials were found in PubMed using the following keywords ('methamphetamine') and ('addiction' OR 'withdrawal' OR 'treatment' OR 'pharmacotherapy'). Randomized placebo-controlled trials enrolling treatment-seeking METH-dependent subjects and inherent secondary analysis were included.Expert opinion: Overall, end-of-treatment abstinence, reduced METH use or lower relapse rates were seen on METH dependent subgroups or attained significance only following post hoc analysis, irrespective of the medication tested. For example, light and heavy METH users seem to respond differently to pharmacotherapy. This together with the heterogeneous nature of the METH dependent population strongly suggests that some drugs herein described (e.g. mirtazapine, methylphenidate) should be further tested in clinical trials focused on subgroups. Lastly, objective measures, such as urinalysis, are mandatory to include in clinical trials and early treatment response and/or medication compliance should be carefully monitored and considered as predictors of success/failure.