Literature Collection
13K+
References
11K+
Articles
1700+
Grey Literature
4800+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 13,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
Access more information about this Resource
Access more information about this Resource
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
BACKGROUND: Integrating therapist-led sessions and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) materials within one online platform may be effective for people with depression. A trial evaluating this mode of delivering CBT is being conducted. To maximize future trial recruitment and understand patients' views of health interventions, it is important to explore reasons for declining to participate. AIM: To explore patients' reasons for declining to participate in a trial of integrated online CBT for depression. DESIGN & SETTING: A mixed methods study collecting data from patients via questionnaires and telephone interviews at the three UK trial sites. METHOD: Individuals completed a short questionnaire about their reasons for not taking part in the trial. Telephone interviews further explored these reasons with a sub-group. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative interviews were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Of 1799 patients who responded to an invitation to participate in the trial, 40.3% declined contact. The most common reasons were not wanting: to take part in research (n=387); therapy provided online (n=284); to receive CBT (n=262). Qualitative interviews with 15 'decliners' highlighted that decisions related to perceptions of eligibility, previous experiences of CBT and uncertainty about receiving CBT online. Personal circumstances, depressive symptoms or other mental health issues were also barriers to participation. CONCLUSION: Reasons given by primary care patients for not taking part in a trial of integrated online CBT suggest that, at the point of recruitment, it is important to discuss the patient's perceptions of their eligibility and whether they would accept the intervention being evaluated.
Pagination
Page 428 Use the links to move to the next, previous, first, or last page.
