Literature Collection

OBJECTIVE:  This study aimed to describe opioid prescribing patterns for pregnant patients with a history of or active opioid use to inform postpartum pain management strategies. STUDY DESIGN:  We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients with a history of opioid use disorder (OUD) or chronic pain seen at a single outpatient clinic specializing in opioid use and OUD in pregnancy from January 2019 to August 2021. Patient characteristics, delivery outcomes, and opioid prescribing information were collected through electronic health record fields. We used descriptive statistics to characterize differences in receipt of an opioid prescription, prescription size, and receipt of a prescription refill across three patient groups: patients with OUD on medication, patients with OUD maintaining abstinence, and patients with chronic pain using opioids. In the study period, the institutional average rate of opioid prescribing after cesarean and vaginal birth were 80.0 and 2.8%, respectively. RESULTS:  Of the 69 patients included in this study, 46 (66.7%) had a history of OUD on medication, 14 (20.3%) had a history of OUD maintaining abstinence, and 9 (13.0%) had a history of chronic pain. Receipt of an opioid prescription after childbirth was more common after cesarean birth (12/23, 52.2%) than vaginal birth (3/46, 6.5%). Refills were common in patients who received an opioid proscription (cesarean: 5/12, 41.7%; vaginal: 1/3, 33.3%). CONCLUSION:  Compared with institutional averages, postpartum opioid prescribing rates for people with a history of OUD or chronic pain were 50 to 60% lower for cesarean birth and three times higher for vaginal birth. Future work is needed to balance opioid stewardship and harm reduction with adequate pain control in these high-risk populations. KEY POINTS: · Opioid prescribing rates for patients with OUD/chronic pain were 60% lower for cesarean birth than institutional averages.. · Opioid prescribing rates for patients with OUD/chronic pain were three times higher for vaginal birth than institutional averages.. · Refill rates following birth were high overall for cesarean (40%) and vaginal (33%) birth.. · More work is needed to balance opioid prescribing with adequate pain control in high-risk patients..

Background: The United States is experiencing a maternal health crisis that continues to worsen in the face of racial/ethnic disparities, rising chronic disease burden among birthing patients, and policy barriers to health care access. Longitudinal postpartum primary care is critical to mitigating these trends, but current rates of use are low, and evidence-based interventions are limited. This scoping review aims to understand the current literature and components of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) used in postpartum primary care and its impact on maternal health outcomes. Methods: We identified 74 studies published between 2000 and 2023 through comprehensive searches of four databases. Extracted data was synthesized for their impact on maternal health, including equity considerations and the primary CCM element. Results: The studies were collated based on their primary maternal health priority (general health n = 13, depression and anxiety n = 34, diabetes n = 3, hypertension n = 5, adolescent parents n = 6, and substance use disorder n = 13). The most common CCM elements were Delivery System Design and Self-Management Support. The least common CCM element was Clinical Information Systems, with electronic health record challenges noted as a barrier. We identified successful interventions that increased depression screening, postpartum hypertension follow-up via telehealth, and integrated contraceptive education within shared parent-child medical homes for adolescent parents. Interventions were largely feasible and acceptable for both patients and clinicians. Conclusions: This review highlights several potential strategies to improve and scale longitudinal postpartum primary care. Further work is needed to ensure equitable delivery, improved connection with community resources, and to expand informatics in postpartum care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Factors associated with physician practice choice include residency location, training experiences, and financial incentives. How length of training affects practice setting and clinical care features postgraduation is unknown. METHODS: In this Length of Training Pilot (LoTP) study, we surveyed 366 graduates of 3-year (3YR) and 434 graduates of 4-year (4YR) programs 1 year after completion of training between 2013 and 2021. Variables assessed included reasons for practice setting choice, practice type, location, practice and community size, specialty mix, and clinical care delivery features (eg, integrated behavioral health, risk stratified care management). We compared different length of training models using χ2 or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and independent samples, and t test (unequal variances) for continuous variables. RESULTS: Response rates ranged from 50% to 88% for 3YR graduates and 68% to 95% for 4YR graduates. Scope of practice was a predominant reason for graduates choosing their eventual practice, and salary was a less likely reason for those completing 4 years versus 3 years of training (scope, 72% vs 55%, P=.001; salary, 15% vs 22%, P=.028). Community size, practice size, practice type, specialty mix, and practice in a federally designated underserved site did not differ between the two groups. We found no differences in patient-centered medical home features when comparing the practices of 3YR to 4YR graduates. CONCLUSIONS: Training length did not affect practice setting or practice features for graduates of LoTP programs. Future LoTP analyses will examine how length of training affects scope of practice and clinical preparedness, which may elucidate other elements associated with practice choice.

In recent years, neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) rates have increased rapidly across the United States, rising from 1.2 (2000) to 5.8 (2012) per 1000 hospital births annually. Because most NAS infants are treated in an intensive care setting, associated hospital charges are high and continue to escalate, rising on average from $39,400 in 2000 to $66,700 in 2012. An innovative NAS treatment program, which includes early-initiated methadone therapy, rooming-in, and combined inpatient/outpatient weaning in a low-acuity nursery, has been in place since 2003 at a large Southeastern hospital. The program has proven safe, effective and low cost for treating infants of >/=35 weeks gestational age whose mothers used long-acting opioids. Given that 81% of NAS cases in the United States are funded by Medicaid programs and that the cost burden is rising rapidly, researchers considered the potential saved charges associated with implementing the same program in other hospitals state- and nationwide. Researchers used regression models to project state and national NAS birth rates from 2015-2025 and to predict future NAS charges under current treatment protocols. Three scenarios were developed to compare the potential saved charges of implementing the innovative NAS treatment program across the state and nation with assumptions related to the percent of NAS infants eligible for the program, percent funded by Medicaid, and fluctuations in average length of stay. The potential saved charges are substantial, creating a compelling case for policy makers and hospitals in the pursuit of safe, effective, and cost-conscious NAS care.