Literature Collection

BACKGROUND: Despite the recognized benefits of integrating patient perspectives into healthcare design and clinical decision support, theoretical approaches and standardized methods are lacking. Various strategies, such as developing pathways, have evolved to address these challenges. Previous research emphasized the need for a framework for care pathways that includes theoretical principles, extensive user involvement, and data from electronic health records to bridge the gap between different fields and disciplines. Standardizing the representation of the patient perspective could facilitate its sharing across healthcare organizations and domains and its integration into journal systems, shifting the balance of power from the provider to the patient. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to 1) Identify research approaches taken to develop patient-centred, integrated, care pathways supported by electronic health records 2) Propose a socio-technical framework for designing patient-centred care pathways across multiple healthcare levels that integrates the voice of the patient with the knowledge of the care provider and technological perspectives. METHODS: This study conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and PRISMA-ScR protocol. The databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, IEEE, and Google Scholar were searched using a key term search strategy including variations of patient-centred, integrated care, pathway, framework and model to identify relevant studies. Eligible articles included peer-reviewed literature documenting methodologies for mapping patient-centred, integrated care pathways in healthcare service design. RESULTS: This review summarizes the application of care pathway modelling practices across various areas of healthcare innovation. The search resulted in 410 studies, with 16 articles included after the full review and grey literature search. CONCLUSIONS: Our research illustrated incorporating patient perspectives into modelling care pathways and healthcare service design. Regardless of the medical domain, our methodology proposes an approach for modelling patient-centred, integrated care pathways across the care continuum, including using electronic health records to support the pathways.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study validates the Flourish Index-Revised (FI-R), a tool evaluating integrated healthcare models. The original Flourish Index (FI) was developed in 2018 and has been refined to align with the FlourishCare (FC) Model (Model) for geriatric primary care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Model provides integrated biopsychosocial healthcare to older adults. The FI-R uses 25 quality-of-care indicators and 7 contextual community indicators. The FI-R was validated with Categorial Principal Components Analysis (CATPCA) using a sample of 949 patients 50+ who were mostly female (73%), non-Hispanic White (70%), living in urban areas (90%), and married (29%), single (22%), or divorced (19%). The mean age was 73.46 (standard deviation [SD] = 10.86) and mean years of education was 14.30 (SD = 2.14). RESULTS: CATPCA showed a 4-dimensional structure of biological, psychological, and 2 social determinants of health (SDOH) subdomains: health behaviors and community. Final selection of indicators was based on total variance accounted for >0.30, absolute values of item loadings >0.45, and not having cross-loadings >0.45 on 2 factors. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the determinants were biological = 0.75, psychological = 0.76, SDOH:community = 0.70, SDOH:health behaviors = 0.50, and total FI-R = 0.95. Sensitivity to change was shown for the total FI-R, psychological determinants, and SDOH:health behaviors, but not for biological determinants. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The validation of the FI-R shows promise for its usability to evaluate integrated healthcare models using existing measures in electronic health systems. More work is needed to improve the incorporation of SDOH:sociodemographics into the FI-R.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food as Medicine (FAM) and supplemental nutrition programs like supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP), women, infants, and children (WIC), and school meals aim to combat rising diet-related chronic diseases and healthcare costs by addressing poor diet and food insecurity. However, their effectiveness is limited by a lack of community integration in planning, implementation, and evaluation. We introduce the Food Access, Justice, and Sovereignty (FAJS) framework, which expands FAM efforts to address acute food disparity through community-based strategies grounded in justice and sovereignty. RECENT FINDINGS: FAM interventions on adult populations have demonstrated a positive impact on food insecurity and its related chronic illness and shows promise for pediatric populations. However, community-driven solutions are essential for shifting power toward greater integration of the lived experiences of community, which can enhance positive behavioral changes needed for greater prevention and management of chronic illness. SUMMARY: Using community driven approaches through the lens of access, justice, and sovereignty address the effects of food insecurity and diet-related chronic diseases for adults and pediatric populations. Through the FAJS Framework, interventionalists can develop sustainable nutrition programs that engender community health, control, and lasting impact.

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence of food insecurity among pregnant and parenting women with opioid use disorder (OUD), its association with psychosocial health, and their experience with the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infant Child (WIC) program. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study collected survey data through REDCAP. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single, urban, opioid treatment program. SUBJECTS: A total of 91 female participants (≥18 years of age and receiving OUD treatment services) were approached about the study and all consented. MEASURES: Measures included: US Household Short Form Food Security Survey, Patient Health Questionnaire 4(PHQ4), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and a demographics and food behavior survey. ANALYSIS: Descriptive analyses (frequency, means) described data and Chi-Square, Fischer's exact, t-tests were used to compare data between food security groups. RESULTS: Participants were on average 34 years old, Caucasian (68%), and non-Hispanic (87%). Most reported low (32%) to very low (33%) food security. Pearson correlation analyses indicate a strong positive linear relationship between Food Security Score and PHQ4 Total (P = .0002), PHQ4 Depression (P = .0003), PHQ4 Anxiety (P = .0009), and PSS Total (P < .0001). Only 38% felt the foods available in WIC supported their breastfeeding. Limitations include a single site and recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Significant nutritional inequity in families affected by maternal substance use exists, with potential for adverse maternal and child development related implications.

This project implements a training intervention to improve medication history interviewing skills and offers a guide to creating a single medication history list within the medical record. The training focuses on identifying patient risk factors frequently responsible for inaccurate medication reconciliation, including limited English proficiency and low health literacy, complex medication histories, or impaired cognitive status. The toolkit contains resources for both health care professionals and patients, including: Resources for measuring error and associated harm. Guidelines on safe process design principles. Evaluation, education, and training tools. Lessons learned on implementation and sustainability of medication reconciliation, among others.