Literature Collection

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between mental health status and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, given that poor mental health may reduce engagement in preventive health behaviors. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2018 and 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys, including men aged 50-69 years without history of prostate cancer. The primary outcome was self-reported PSA screening in the past two years. Poor mental health was defined as at least 14 days of self-reported poor mental health or a depressive disorder diagnosis. Covariates included socio-demographic variables, chronic comorbidities, and healthcare access. Logistic regression assessed associations between mental health, PSA screening, and covariates. RESULTS: A total of 114,972 men were included, representing a weighted population of 30.5 million. Of them, 81.9% and 18.1% had good and poor mental health, respectively. The overall PSA screening rate was 28.2%. Men with good mental health were more likely to undergo PSA screening (29.3% vs 23.2%; P <.001). Poor mental health was associated with 10% lower odds of PSA screening (aOR: 0.90 [0.83-0.98]). Higher adherence was observed among older participants (aOR: 2.54), with higher education levels (aOR: 1.95), or married (aOR: 1.21). Having at least one personal doctor (aOR: 2.86) was a strong predictor of PSA screening. CONCLUSION: Men with poor mental health are less likely to undergo PSA screening. Addressing mental health barriers is essential to improve preventive care. Integrated care models with mental health support may reduce disparities and enhance prostate cancer outcomes in this population.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists are well-placed to promote and provide mental health medication management services. However, literature evaluating the impact of pharmacy services in supporting people living with severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) is currently limited. An individualised, goal-oriented pharmacist-led support service that focused on improving the physical and mental health of consumers living with SPMI, namely the PharMIbridge intervention, was provided to consumer participants as part of the PharMIbridge Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT). OBJECTIVE(S): To explore the experiences of the participants who delivered and supported the implementation of the PharMIbridge intervention and propose ideas and supports needed for broader implementation and sustainability of pharmacist-led support services for people living with SPMI. METHODS: Interviews and focus group discussions were undertaken with PharMIbridge pharmacists and mentors, respectively. Audio-recordings were de-identified and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was conducted using an iterative, inductive approach. The key themes identified were furthered divided into subthemes. Subthemes were then mapped to the EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment) framework. RESULTS: Data were collected from one focus group involving six RCT mentors and 16 semi-structured interviews with community pharmacists. Five overarching themes emerged: "Training needs", "Pharmacist integration within the healthcare system", "Environmental factors", "Attitudes and behaviour" and "Pharmacy operations". Twelve subthemes were mapped to EPIS phases "Preparation", "Implementation" and "Sustainment" and EPIS constructs "Outer" context, "Inner" context and "Bridging" factors. CONCLUSION: Adequate remuneration and supports to encourage healthcare professional collaboration are necessary to establish and sustain functioning, integrated pharmacy mental health services. A shift in pharmacy business and workflow models is necessary to support community pharmacies to implement mental health services. In addition, there is a need to promote psychological support services to ensure that pharmacists are well supported while delivering pharmacy mental health services.

Background: Little is known about the implication of launching virtual-first primary care (VPC) in a health system. Our experience and survey can guide others to establish their virtual-first programs. This study examines implementation, patient perspectives, and satisfaction with VPC at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). Methods: We conducted a Web-based survey to examine factors associated with the likelihood of early adoption and continued use of VPC. We used bivariate comparisons and cluster analysis to evaluate the results. The survey was sent to 1,420 patients seen between August 2022 and January 2023. Responses related to demographics, doctor-patient relations, savings, experience, and future preferences of use were aggregated. To evaluate the relationship between demographics and survey responses, we conducted univariate analysis. Results: Females and patients between 40 and 50 years of age were the primary users and indicated the most interest in continued use. Health insurance status seems not to be a significant predictor in the selection and use of VPC. Most (78%) felt that the physician-patient relationship was unimpaired. The survey showed that 90% of patients saved time by using VPC, and 66% reported saving money on tolls, childcare, or gasoline. Only 13% reported not wanting to continue VPC. Discussion: A majority of surveyed patients felt the doctor-patient relationship was not negatively affected in VPC. VPC programs can be implemented with high patient satisfaction in an integrated health system. VPC is acceptable to most patients, and further expansion of the model is warranted.

This study, using a mixed-methods approach, explored pharmacy students' perceptions and experiences of formative and summative OSCEs and their use of AI tools in OSCE preparation. Formative and summative OSCE marks were compared. Further quantitative data were collected from 82 students (89.13 %) via a post-OSCE questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected from 20 face-to-face semi-structured interviews that were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed. Results showed improvement in marks from formative to summative OSCE, with mean marks increasing from 44.2 % to 56.0 %. Students generally perceived the OSCE process positively, with the majority rating their overall experience as excellent (65 %). The formative OSCE was viewed as particularly helpful in preparing for the summative. The integration of AI tools in OSCE preparation was well-received, with 58.5 % of students finding them helpful. However, challenges such as "lack of humanization" and occasional inaccuracies were noted. Themes generated from qualitative data endorsed the quantitative findings and were categorized into facilitators (briefing session, formative OSCE, feedback from role players and evaluators, AI tools) and barriers (challenges with the use of AI tools, anxiety, time management). The study highlights the importance of formative assessments prior to summative and the potential of AI tools in enhancing OSCE preparation, but emphasizes the need for structured training and guidance.

BACKGROUND: Young people often face significant challenges accessing effective mental health support as they navigate through complex healthcare systems, education pathways, and social pressures. Understanding the service-level barriers they encounter is critical to improving mental health system design and delivery. While previous studies have examined individual barriers to mental healthcare access, few have adopted a cross-sectorial, youth-informed approach which captures the interrelated structural, institutional, and socio-cultural factors influencing young people’s mental health experiences. METHODS: Seventeen participants aged 18–24 years with lived experience of depression and/or anxiety participated in nine in-person focus groups and interviews in Perth. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify systemic barriers and facilitators to mental healthcare, with a particular focus on access, care coordination, therapeutic engagement, and service responsiveness. RESULTS: Key themes included fragmented care pathways, inadequate provider follow-up, prolonged wait times, financial constraints, lack of youth-specific mental health training among clinicians, and limited therapeutic rapport. Participants also described inadequate mental health literacy within schools and persistent stigma in social and familial settings. These intersecting barriers hindered access, disrupted continuity of care, and undermined trust in the mental health system. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight critical inefficiencies in mental health service delivery for young Australians. Policy responses should prioritise integrated care models, investment in multidisciplinary youth mental health hubs, improved school-based mental health literacy, and culturally inclusive anti-stigma initiatives to promote access, trust, and continuity of care.