Literature Collection

Magnifying Glass
Collection Insights

12K+

References

11K+

Articles

1600+

Grey Literature

4800+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Enter Search Term(s)
Year
Sort by
Order
Show
12771 Results
12683
Who will Provide Integrated Care? Assessing the Workforce for the Integration of Behavioral Health and Primary Care in New Hampshire
Type: Report
Authors: Alexander Blount, James Fauth, Anne Nordstrom, Sarah Pearson
Year: 2016
Publication Place: Keene, NH
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

12684
Whole person assessment for family medicine: a systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: H. R. Thomas, M. Best, D. Chua, D. King, J. Lynch
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
12685
Whole person care: Outcomes from a 5-year care model integrating primary care into a behavioral health clinic
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. K. Chambers, M. Thomas, M. J. Brimmer, J. Butcher, K. Griswold
Year: 2023
12686
Whole person care: Outcomes from a 5-year care model integrating primary care into a behavioral health clinic
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Meghan K. Chambers, Matthew Thomas, Maximilian J. Brimmer, James Butcher, Kim Griswold
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
12687
Whole-Body Health: Behavioral Approaches to Managing Depression in Primary Care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. M. Ads, A. E. Keller
Year: 2023
Abstract:

Pediatricians are typically the first people families trust to discuss their child's mental health concerns and are uniquely positioned to help address the problem of limited access to mental health services. This article covers brief behavioral interventions pediatricians can use to help treat mild depressive symptoms in the primary care context. Interventions include strategies for talking about depression (eg, validating experiences, normalizing difficulties, and emphasizing whole-body health), educating patients and their families (eg, psychoeducation about signs, symptoms, and treatment options), using brief behavioral and cognitive interventions (eg, behavioral activation and cognitive coping), and including a family and culturally sensitive approach to symptom management. [Pediatr Ann. 2023; 52(11):e413-e417.].

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
12688
Whose Job is it Anyway? A Qualitative Study of Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosing Anxiety Disorders in Integrated Health Settings
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. V. Chen, H. Singh, N. E. Hundt, M. E. Kunik, M. A. Stanley, M. Plasencia, T. L. Fletcher
Year: 2025
Abstract:

Up to 33% of American adults will experience a diagnosable anxiety disorder in their lifetime. Approximately one-third of anxiety diagnoses assigned by mental health providers in outpatient settings are unspecified. The tendency of many providers to use an unspecified anxiety diagnosis may negatively impact the provision of evidence-based treatments for specific anxiety disorders. This study examines the perspectives of mental health providers working in an integrated and stepped health care system, asking how their roles and responsibilities shape their practices related to diagnosing specific anxiety disorders. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 Veteran Health Administration (VHA) mental health providers to understand their perspectives on diagnosing anxiety disorders. Matrix analysis was used to identify different roles and responsibilities articulated. Thematic analysis was used to highlight themes across providers' discussion of their roles in diagnosing and treating patients. The results show that, for most providers, assigning a specific diagnosis is a component of duties but rarely their focus. Second, it is unclear in which clinic setting a specific anxiety diagnosis should be made. Finally, among different types of mental health professionals, there is no clear designation on who should be providing a specific anxiety diagnosis. Altogether, results indicate that many providers feel making a specific diagnosis for anxiety is the responsibility of others-either those in other clinic settings or with other credentials. Findings call for clearer guidelines that specify individual clinician accountability for obtaining a specific anxiety diagnosis in a team-based environment.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
12689
Why a proven tool to combat opioid abuse is underutilized by healthcare professionals
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. R. Johnson
Year: 2016
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
12690
Why a shared care record is an official medical record
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Y. Gu, M. Orr, J. Warren, G. Humphrey, K. Day, S. Tibby, J. Fitzpatrick
Year: 2013
Publication Place: New Zealand
Abstract: The literature describes three categories of health records: the Official Medical Records held by healthcare providers, Personal Health Records owned by patients, and--a possible in between case--the Shared Care Record. New complications and challenges arise with electronic storage of this latter class of record; for instance, an electronic shared care record may have multiple authors, which presents challenges regarding the roles and responsibilities for record-keeping. This article discusses the definitions and implementations of official medical records, personal health records and shared care records. We also consider the case of a New Zealand pilot of developing and implementing a shared care record in the National Shared Care Planning Programme. The nature and purpose of an official medical record remains the same whether in paper or electronic form. We maintain that a shared care record is an official medical record; it is not a personal health record that is owned and controlled by patients, although it is able to be viewed and interacted with by patients. A shared care record needs to meet the same criteria for medico-legal and ethical duties in the delivery of shared care as pertain to any official medical record.
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
12692
Why aren't physicians prescribing more buprenorphine?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. S. Huhn, K. E. Dunn
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
12693
Why Do Adults Misuse Prescription Drugs?
Type: Government Report
Authors: Rachel N. Lipari, Matthew Williams, Struther L. Van Horn
Year: 2017
Publication Place: Rockville, MD
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

12694
Why do general practitioners not refer patients to behaviour-change programmes after preventive health checks? A mixed-method study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Nina Kamstrup-Larsen, Marie Broholm-Jørgensen, Susanne O. Dalton, Lars B. Larsen, Janus L. Thomsen, Janne S. Tolstrup
Year: 2019
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
12695
Why do Patients Stay in Opioid Maintenance Treatment?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Stefan Gutwinski, Lena Karoline Bald, Jurgen Gallinat, Andreas Heinz, Felix Bermpohl
Year: 2014
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
12697
Why do you need to move beyond first-line therapy for major depression?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. Culpepper
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
12698
Why Guidelines for Primary Care Providers?
Type: Government Report
Authors: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Year: 2016
Publication Place: Atlanta, GA
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

12699
Why is buprenorphine coformulated with naloxone?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Eric Urnoski
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract:

Combination buprenorphine-naloxone is a cornerstone of outpatient treatment for substance use disorder, and is more widely accessible in primary care. Because oral buprenorphine has been diverted and abused for its euphoric properties, a combination formulation was developed and will trigger withdrawal symptoms if injected IV.

Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
12700
Why is it so hard to implement change? A qualitative examination of barriers and facilitators to distribution of naloxone for overdose prevention in a safety net environment
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. L. Drainoni, E. A. Koppelman, J. A. Feldman, A . Y. Walley, P. M. Mitchell, J. Ellison, E. Bernstein
Year: 2016
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The increase in opioid overdose deaths has become a national public health crisis. Naloxone is an important tool in opioid overdose prevention. Distribution of nasal naloxone has been found to be a feasible, and effective intervention in community settings and may have potential high applicability in the emergency department, which is often the initial point of care for persons at high risk of overdose. One safety net hospital introduced an innovative policy to offer take-home nasal naloxone via a standing order to ensure distribution to patients at risk for overdose. The aims of this study were to examine acceptance and uptake of the policy and assess facilitators and barriers to implementation. METHODS: After obtaining pre-post data on naloxone distribution, we conducted a qualitative study. The PARiHS framework steered development of the qualitative guide. We used theoretical sampling in order to include the range of types of emergency department staff (50 total). The constant comparative method was initially used to code the transcripts and identify themes; the themes that emerged from the coding were then mapped back to the evidence, context and facilitation constructs of the PARiHS framework. RESULTS: Acceptance of the policy was good but uptake was low. Primary themes related to facilitators included: real-world driven intervention with philosophical, clinician and leadership support; basic education and training efforts; availability of resources; and ability to leave the ED with the naloxone kit in hand. Barriers fell into five general categories: protocol and policy; workflow and logistical; patient-related; staff roles and responsibilities; and education and training. CONCLUSIONS: The actual implementation of a new innovation in healthcare delivery is largely driven by factors beyond acceptance. Despite support and resources, implementation was challenging, with low uptake. While the potential of this innovation is unknown, understanding the experience is important to improve uptake in this setting and offer possible solutions for other facilities to address the opioid overdose crisis. Use of the PARiHS framework allowed us to recognize and understand key evidence, contextual and facilitation barriers to the successful implementation of the policy and to identify areas for improvement.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection