Literature Collection

Collection Insights

11K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4600+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
11233 Results
11061
Webinar archives
Type: Web Resource
Authors: Collaborative Family Healthcare Association
Year: 2015
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

11062
Weekly and Monthly Subcutaneous Buprenorphine Depot Formulations vs Daily Sublingual Buprenorphine With Naloxone for Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. R. Lofwall, S. L. Walsh, E. V. Nunes, G. L. Bailey, S. C. Sigmon, K. M. Kampman, M. Frost, F. Tiberg, M. Linden, B. Sheldon, S. Oosman, S. Peterson, M. Chen, S. Kim
Year: 2018
Abstract: IMPORTANCE: Buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder may be improved by sustained-release formulations. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment involving novel weekly and monthly subcutaneous (SC) buprenorphine depot formulations is noninferior to a daily sublingual (SL) combination of buprenorphine hydrochloride and naloxone hydrochloride in the treatment of opioid use disorder. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This outpatient, double-blind, double-dummy randomized clinical trial was conducted at 35 sites in the United States from December 29, 2015, through October 19, 2016. Participants were treatment-seeking adults with moderate-to-severe opioid use disorder. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization to daily SL placebo and weekly (first 12 weeks; phase 1) and monthly (last 12 weeks; phase 2) SC buprenorphine (SC-BPN group) or to daily SL buprenorphine with naloxone (24 weeks) with matched weekly and monthly SC placebo injections (SL-BPN/NX group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary end points tested for noninferiority were response rate (10% margin) and the mean proportion of opioid-negative urine samples for 24 weeks (11% margin). Responder status was defined as having no evidence of illicit opioid use for at least 8 of 10 prespecified points during weeks 9 to 24, with 2 of these at week 12 and during month 6 (weeks 21-24). The mean proportion of samples with no evidence of illicit opioid use (weeks 4-24) evaluated by a cumulative distribution function (CDF) was an a priori secondary outcome with planned superiority testing if the response rate demonstrated noninferiority. RESULTS: A total of 428 participants (263 men [61.4%] and 165 women [38.6%]; mean [SD] age, 38.4 [11.0] years) were randomized to the SL-BPN/NX group (n?=?215) or the SC-BPN group (n?=?213). The response rates were 31 of 215 (14.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 37 of 213 (17.4%) for the SC-BPN group, a 3.0% difference (95% CI, -4.0% to 9.9%; P?<?.001). The proportion of opioid-negative urine samples was 1099 of 3870 (28.4%) for the SL-BPN/NX group and 1347 of 3834 (35.1%) for the SC-BPN group, a 6.7% difference (95% CI, -0.1% to 13.6%; P?<?.001). The CDF for the SC-BPN group (26.7%) was statistically superior to the CDF for the SL-BPN/NX group (0; P?=?.004). Injection site adverse events (none severe) occurred in 48 participants (22.3%) in the SL-BPN/NX group and 40 (18.8%) in the SC-BPN group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with SL buprenorphine, depot buprenorphine did not result in an inferior likelihood of being a responder or having urine test results negative for opioids and produced superior results on the CDF of no illicit opioid use. These data suggest that depot buprenorphine is efficacious and may have advantages.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
11063
Welcome to the Center for Integrated Primary Care!
Type: Web Resource
Authors: The Center for Integrated Primary Care
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

11064
Wellness Tour for Tribal Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Uniting Sacred Space with Western Medicine to Prevent Substance Use
Type: Journal Article
Authors: N. Wakhlu, C. Soto, M. Duncan, A. Titman, B. J. Turner
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
11066
West Virginia's model of buprenorphine expansion: Preliminary results
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Erin L. Winstanley, Laura R. Lander, James H. Berry, James J. 3rd Mahoney, Wanhong Zheng, Jeremy Herschler, Patrick Marshalek, Sheena Sayres, Jay Mason, Marc W. Haut
Year: 2019
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
11067
What "patient-centered" should mean: Confessions of an extremist
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. Berwick
Year: 2009
Abstract: "Patient-centeredness" is a dimension of health care quality in its own right, not just because of its connection with other desired aims, like safety and effectiveness. Its proper incorporation into new health care designs will involve some radical, unfamiliar, and disruptive shifts in control and power, out of the hands of those who give care and into the hands of those who receive it. Such a consumerist view of the quality of care, itself, has important differences from the more classical, professionally dominated definitions of "quality." New designs, like the so-called medical home, should incorporate that change.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
11068
What administrators should know about the primary care setting
Type: Book Chapter
Authors: Larry C. James
Year: 2009
Publication Place: New York, NY, US
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

11069
What Are Patient Preferences for Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. A. Dunn, Chokron Garneau, H. Filipowicz, M. Mahoney, T. Seay-Morrison, K. Dent, M. McGovern
Year: 2021
Abstract:

Background: Behavioral health services, integrated into primary care practices, have become increasingly implemented. Although patient satisfaction has been studied, limited information exists about patient preferences for integrated behavioral health in primary care and how perceptions may vary. Objective: To determine patient preferences for integrated behavioral health within primary care and explore differences across patient groups. Methods: A self-report survey was distributed within a quality improvement initiative in an academic health system. A brief 8-item self-report questionnaire of perceptions and preferences for integrated behavioral health was administered to 752 primary care patients presenting before their visits at two primary care clinics. Participation was voluntary, responses were anonymous, and all patients presenting during a three-week timeframe were eligible. Results: In general, patients preferred to have behavioral health concerns addressed within primary care (n = 301; 41%) rather than referral to a specialist (7.5%; n = 55). There was no evidence of variation in preferences by demographic characteristics. Comfort levels to receive behavioral health services (P < .001) and perceived needs being met were significantly associated with preferences for receiving IBHPC (P < .001). Conclusion: This project provided valuable data to support the implementation of integrated behavioral health services in primary care clinics. In general, patients prefer to have behavioral health issues addressed within their primary care experience rather than being referred to specialty mental health care. This study adds to an expanding pool of studies exploring patient preferences for integrated behavioral health in primary care.

Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
11071
What are the facilitators and barriers in physician organizations' use of care management processes?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: T. Bodenheimer, M. C. Wang, T. G. Rundall, S. M. Shortell, R. R. Gillies, N. Oswald, L. Casalino, J. C. Robinson
Year: 2004
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
11072
What are the key elements for implementing intensive primary care? A multisite Veterans Health Administration case study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. T. Chang, P. V. Raja, S. E. Stockdale, M. L. Katz, D. M. Zulman, J. A. Eng, K. H. Hedrick, J. L. Jackson, N. Pathak, B. Watts, C. Patton, G. Schectman, S. M. Asch
Year: 2018
Publication Place: Netherlands
Abstract: Many integrated health systems and accountable care organizations have turned to intensive primary care programs to improve quality of care and reduce costs for high-need high-cost patients. How best to implement such programs remains an active area of discussion. In 2014, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented five distinct intensive primary care programs as part of a demonstration project that targeted Veterans at the highest risk for hospitalization. We found that programs evolved over time, eventually converging on the implementation of the following elements: 1) an interdisciplinary care team, 2) chronic disease management, 3) comprehensive patient assessment and evaluation, 4) care and case management, 5) transitional care support, 6) preventive home visits, 7) pharmaceutical services, 8) chronic disease self-management, 9) caregiver support services, 10) health coaching, and 11) advanced care planning. The teams also found that including social workers and mental health providers on the interdisciplinary teams was critical to effectively address psychosocial needs of these complex patients. Having a central implementation coordinator facilitated the convergence of these program features across diverse demonstration sites. In future iterations of these programs, VHA intends to standardize staffing and key features to develop a scalable program that can be disseminated throughout the system.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
11073
What are the key elements for implementing intensive primary care? A multisite Veterans Health Administration case study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. T. Chang, P. V. Raja, S. E. Stockdale, M. L. Katz, D. M. Zulman, J. A. Eng, K. H. Hedrick, J. L. Jackson, N. Pathak, B. Watts, C. Patton, G. Schectman, S. M. Asch
Year: 2018
Publication Place: Netherlands
Abstract: Many integrated health systems and accountable care organizations have turned to intensive primary care programs to improve quality of care and reduce costs for high-need high-cost patients. How best to implement such programs remains an active area of discussion. In 2014, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented five distinct intensive primary care programs as part of a demonstration project that targeted Veterans at the highest risk for hospitalization. We found that programs evolved over time, eventually converging on the implementation of the following elements: 1) an interdisciplinary care team, 2) chronic disease management, 3) comprehensive patient assessment and evaluation, 4) care and case management, 5) transitional care support, 6) preventive home visits, 7) pharmaceutical services, 8) chronic disease self-management, 9) caregiver support services, 10) health coaching, and 11) advanced care planning. The teams also found that including social workers and mental health providers on the interdisciplinary teams was critical to effectively address psychosocial needs of these complex patients. Having a central implementation coordinator facilitated the convergence of these program features across diverse demonstration sites. In future iterations of these programs, VHA intends to standardize staffing and key features to develop a scalable program that can be disseminated throughout the system.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
11075
What caregivers want: Preferences for behavioral health screening implementation procedures in pediatric primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Mallory Schneider, Krista Mehari, Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling
Year: 2020
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
11077
What clinical differences distinguish depressed teens with and without comorbid externalizing problems?
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
11078
What constitutes "behavioral health"? Perceptions of substance-related problems and their treatment in primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: I. Q. Chen, Chokron Garneau, T. Seay-Morrison, M. R. Mahoney, H. Filipowicz, M. P. McGovern
Year: 2020
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Integrating behavioral health in primary care is a widespread endeavor. Yet rampant variation exists in models and approaches. One significant question is whether frontline providers perceive that behavioral health includes substance use. The current study examined front line providers': 1. definition of behavioral health, and 2. levels of comfort treating patients who use alcohol and other drugs. Frontline providers at two primary care clinics were surveyed using a 28-item instrument designed to assess their comfort and knowledge of behavioral health, including substance use. Two questions from the Integrated Behavioral Health Staff Perceptions Survey pertaining to confidence in clinics' ability to care for patients' behavioral health needs and comfort dealing with patients with behavioral health needs were used for the purposes of this report. Participants also self-reported their clinic role. Responses to these two items were assessed and then compared across roles. Chi square estimates and analysis of variance tests were used to examine relationships between clinic roles and comfort of substance use care delivery. RESULTS: Physicians, nurses/nurse practitioners, medical assistants, and other staff (N = 59) participated. Forty-nine participants included substance use in their definition of behavioral health. Participants reported the least comfort caring for patients who use substances (M = 3.5, SD = 1.0) compared to those with mental health concerns (M = 4.1, SD = 0.7), chronic medical conditions (M = 4.2, SD = 0.7), and general health concerns (M = 4.2, SD = 0.7) (p < 0.001). Physicians (M = 3.0, SD = 0.7) reported significantly lower levels of comfort than medical assistants (M = 4.2, SD = 0.9) (p < 0.001) caring for patients who use substances. CONCLUSIONS: In a small sample of key stakeholders from two primary care clinics who participated in this survey, most considered substance use part of the broad umbrella of behavioral health. Compared to other conditions, primary care providers reported being less comfortable addressing patients' substance use. Level of comfort varied by role, where physicians were least comfortable, and medical assistants most comfortable.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
11079
What Do Adolescents and Their Parents Need From Mental Health Integration in Primary Care? A Qualitative Exploration of Design Insights
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Andrea J. Hoopes, Susan D. Brandzel, Casey Luce, Dawn M. Ferguson, Lisa Shulman, Blanca Chavez, Paula Lozano, Gwen T. Lapham
Year: 2022
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
11080
What do general practice patients want when they present medically unexplained symptoms, and why do their doctors feel pressurized?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. Salmon, A. Ring, C. F. Dowrick, G. M. Humphris
Year: 2005
Publication Place: England
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We tested predictions that patients with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) want more emotional support and explanation from their general practitioners (GPs) than do other patients, and that doctors find them more controlling because of this. DESIGN: Thirty-five doctors participated in a cross-sectional comparison of case-matched groups. Three hundred fifty-seven patients attending consecutively with MUS were matched for doctor and time of attendance with 357 attending with explained symptoms. Patients self-reported the extent to which they wanted somatic intervention, emotional support, explanation and reassurance. Doctors rated their perception of patients' influence on the consultation. Predictions were tested by multilevel analyses. RESULTS: Patients with MUS sought more emotional support than did others, but no more explanation and reassurance or somatic intervention. A minority of doctors experienced them as exerting more influence than others. The experience of patient influence was related to the patients' desire for support. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should examine why GPs provide disproportionate levels of somatic intervention to patients who seek, instead, greater levels of emotional support.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection