Literature Collection

Magnifying Glass
Collection Insights

11K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4600+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Enter Search Term(s)
Year
Sort by
Order
Show
11193 Results
10801
Use of Telemedicine and Quality of Care Among Medicare Enrollees With Serious Mental Illness
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. D. Wilcock, H. A. Huskamp, A. B. Busch, S. T. Normand, L. Uscher-Pines, P. V. Raja, J. R. Zubizarreta, M. L. Barnett, A. Mehrotra
Year: 2023
Abstract:

IMPORTANCE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a large fraction of mental health care was provided via telemedicine. The implications of this shift in care for use of mental health service and quality of care have not been characterized. OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in care patterns and quality during the first year of the pandemic among Medicare beneficiaries with serious mental illness (schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder) cared for at practices with higher vs lower telemedicine use. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cohort study, Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder were attributed to specialty mental health practices that delivered the majority of their mental health care in 2019. Practices were categorized into 3 groups based on the proportion of telemental health visits provided during the first year of the pandemic (March 2020-February 2021): lowest use (0%-49%), middle use (50%-89%), or highest use (90%-100%). Across the 3 groups of practices, differential changes in patient outcomes were calculated from the year before the pandemic started to the year after. These changes were also compared with differential changes from a 2-year prepandemic period. Analyses were conducted in November 2022. EXPOSURE: Practice-level use of telemedicine during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the total number of mental health visits (telemedicine plus in-person) per person. Secondary outcomes included the number of acute hospital and emergency department encounters, all-cause mortality, and quality outcomes, including adherence to antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications (as measured by the number of months of medication fills) and 7- and 30-day outpatient follow-up rates after discharge for a mental health hospitalization. RESULTS: The pandemic cohort included 120 050 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 56.5 [14.5] years; 66 638 females [55.5%]) with serious mental illness. Compared with prepandemic changes and relative to patients receiving care at practices with the lowest telemedicine use: patients receiving care at practices in the middle and highest telemedicine use groups had 1.11 (95% CI, 0.45-1.76) and 1.94 (95% CI, 1.28-2.59) more mental health visits per patient per year (or 7.5% [95% CI, 3.0%-11.9%] and 13.0% [95% CI, 8.6%-17.4%] more mental health visits per year, respectively). Among patients of practices with middle and highest telemedicine use, changes in adherence to antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing medications were -0.4% (95% CI, -1.3% to 0.5%) and -0.1% (95% CI, -1.0% to 0.8%), and hospital and emergency department use for any reason changed by 2.4% (95% CI, -1.5% to 6.2%) and 2.8% (95% CI, -1.2% to 6.8%), respectively. There were no significant differential changes in postdischarge follow-up or mortality rates according to the level of telemedicine use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study of Medicare beneficiaries with serious mental illness, patients receiving care from practices that had a higher level of telemedicine use during the COVID-19 pandemic had more mental health visits per year compared with prepandemic levels, with no differential changes in other observed quality metrics over the same period.

Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
10804
Use of the ADAPTE Method to Develop a Guideline for the Improvement of Depression Care in Primary Care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. V. Nogueras, M. M. Hurtado, E. Flordelis, J. M. Garcia-Herrera, J. M. Morales-Asencio
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Depression is the most frequent psychiatric disorder in primary health care, and the evidence shows that there is suboptimal management by primary care practitioners, perhaps owing to difficulties in decision making. Because clinical guidelines can improve decision making and management, a clinical guideline to manage depression in primary health care was developed in adherence to the ADAPTE method and was implemented in the Malaga Primary Health Care District in Spain. This column reports on the guideline development process, which produced a set of resources to improve the quality of primary health care-based depression care in Spain.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
10805
Use of Video Directly Observed Therapy and Characteristics Associated With Use Among Patients Treated With Buprenorphine in an Office-based Setting
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Andrea C. Radick, Jocelyn James, Brian G. Leroux, Theresa W. Kim, Andrew J. Saxon, Jeffrey H. Samet, Judith I. Tsui
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
10806
Usefulness of symptom feedback to providers in an integrated primary care--mental health care clinic
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. Zubkoff, Y. Young-Xu, B. Shiner, A. Pomerantz, B. V. Watts
Year: 2012
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Measurement-based care has been endorsed but not embraced in mental health settings. There is currently little guidance regarding the best methods to implement measurement-based care. METHODS: A survey of mental health providers was conducted before (N=15) and after (N=17) the implementation of a patient self-report symptom measurement system. RESULTS: At baseline, respondents rarely used the patient self-assessment information (mean+/-SD=1.8+/-1.8); they reported the patient data to be marginally useful (4.1+/-1.9), and only slightly recommended the use of patient assessments (4.3+/-2.0). Possible scores ranged from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating more positivity. At follow-up, respondents almost always used the information in the assessments (6.3+/-1.7), found the patient report data very useful (6.4+/-.8), and highly recommended continued use of patient surveys in the integrated clinic (6.6+/-.5). CONCLUSIONS: Providers' lack of enthusiasm about integration of routine data collection and reporting of patient symptoms may be overcome by simply exposing providers to this process.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10807
Usefulness of the opioid risk tool to predict aberrant drug-related behavior in patients receiving opioids for the treatment of chronic pain
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. R. Witkin, D. Diskina, S. Fernandes, J. T. Farrar, M. A. Ashburn
Year: 2013
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if the opioid risk tool (ORT) was clinically useful in guiding physician decision making during chronic opioid therapy and to determine whether there were differences between the patient-completed and physician-completed ORT. DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. SETTING: A single-center tertiary care outpatient pain management center. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: One-hundred twenty-five patients who received chronic opioids as part of their pain therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients receiving care were asked to complete the ORT as part of their initial evaluation. In addition, as part of this study, a pain physician reviewed the information available at the time of the initial evaluation and completed the ORT. Medical records were reviewed for evidence of moderate-to-severe aberrant drug-related behavior (ADRB), according to specified criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-completed and physician-completed ORT and presence or absence of moderate to severe ADRB. RESULTS: Of the 125 patients included in this study, physician-completed ORT was available for 125 patients, and a patient-completed ORT was available on 87 of these patients. There was good correlation between the patient-completed and physician-completed ORT (correlation coefficient = 0.61). There were 112 observations of ADRB in 53 of 125 patients (42.4 percent) during the observation period of an average of 7.8 months (range 2-17 months). Of these 53 patients, 32 (60.4 percent) were identified by urine drug screen (UDS) alone, 7 (13.2 percent) were identified by physician observation alone, and 14 (26.4 percent) were identified by both UDS and physician observation. Based on the physician-completed ORT, 41 of 106 (38.7 percent) low risk patients had ADRB, compared to 8 of 14 (57.1 percent) moderate risk, and 4 of 5 (80 percent) high risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the patient-completed nor the physician-completed ORT was strongly predictive of moderate-to-severe ADRB in patients receiving chronic opioid therapy for the treatment of noncancer pain in our pain center.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
10808
User-generated quality standards for youth mental health in primary care: a participatory research design using mixed methods
Type: Journal Article
Authors: T. Graham, D. Rose, J. Murray, M. Ashworth, A. Tylee
Year: 2014
Publication Place: England
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop user-generated quality standards for young people with mental health problems in primary care using a participatory research model. METHODS: 50 young people aged 16-25 from community settings and primary care participated in focus groups and interviews about their views and experiences of seeking help for mental health problems in primary care, cofacilitated by young service users and repeated to ensure respondent validation. A second group of young people also aged 16-25 who had sought help for any mental health problem from primary care or secondary care within the last 5 years were trained as focus groups cofacilitators (n=12) developed the quality standards from the qualitative data and participated in four nominal groups (n=28). RESULTS: 46 quality standards were developed and ranked by young service users. Agreement was defined as 100% of scores within a two-point region. Group consensus existed for 16 quality standards representing the following aspects of primary care: better advertising and information (three); improved competence through mental health training and skill mix within the practice (two); alternatives to medication (three); improved referral protocol (three); and specific questions and reassurances (five). Alternatives to medication and specific questions and reassurances are aspects of quality which have not been previously reported. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the feasibility of using participatory research methods in order to develop user-generated quality standards. The development of patient-generated quality standards may offer a more formal method of incorporating the views of service users into quality improvement initiatives. This method can be adapted for generating quality standards applicable to other patient groups.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
10809
Users' involvement in mental health services: programme logic model of an innovative initiative in integrated care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. Tremblay, V. Coulombe, C. Briand
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Collaboration and partnership are key issues for modern health systems seeking to implement quality integrated care that meets the needs of the population. The Carrefour Communautaire-Institutionnel-Usagers (Connecting Community organisations-Institutions-Users, CCIU), involving community- and institution-based mental health workers, carers and users, is an innovative normative integrated care group (group for shared values, culture and vision) established by the Canadian Mental Health Association-Montreal Branch. A programme evaluation approach was used to conduct a logic analysis of the CCIU in order to understand the relationships between its resources, activities and outcomes, build a common understanding and, allow for its replication. METHODS: Five steps were involved in the creation of a programme logic model. A non-exhaustive literature search for similar initiatives, a review of documents related to the CCIU process and direct observations led to the development of a first model. Then, following a participatory and reflexive process, this model was validated with CCIU participants. RESULTS: A comprehensive model and a simplified model were created. Participants' experiential knowledge and scientific knowledge helped to identify the essential components of the successful operation of the CCIU. CONCLUSIONS: The CCIU, with its eight essential components, including relations based on equality and mutual respect, corresponds to an essential step in normative integration and integrated care that lead to improved quality services.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
10810
Using a Behavioral Health Integration Model in a Family Nurse Practitioner Residency
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. T. Wynn
Year: 2024
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Primary care serves as an entry point for many patients to access health care services, especially those who reside in medically underserved areas. Because an initiative exists for family nurse practitioners (FNPs) to fill primary care gaps in medically underserved areas, they must be included in educational strategies to provide quality behavioral health care within their scope of practice. METHOD: An academic-practice partnership was used to provide FNP residents the opportunity to learn to work within their scope of practice in a behavioral health integration model. RESULTS: The residents noted satisfaction with the learning environment, supervisory relationship, and role of the faculty. CONCLUSION: Innovative continuing education activities are needed to prepare novice FNPs to safely practice and enter into a health care workforce pipeline focused on reducing disparities in medically underserved areas. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024; 55(4):203-208.].

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10811
Using a Continuum-Based Framework for Behavioral Health Integration Into Primary Care in New York State
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. Chapman, H. Chung, H. A. Pincus
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Behavioral health integration with primary care has long been shown to be an essential part of improving health care and, more recently, of achieving the "triple aim" as part of national reform. Many states are promoting integration activities as part of Medicaid reform, using different models and strategies. The purpose of this column is to describe a framework developed to support behavioral health integration into primary care settings in New York State and how it is specifically linked to key policy initiatives. The framework is designed to be adaptable to practices of varying sizes and with various resources and organizational structures. Its use in groundbreaking New York State integration initiatives is discussed.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
10812
Using a Delphi Technique to Define Primary Care Behavioral Health Clinical Supervision Competencies
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. A. Ogbeide, B. Bayles
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10813
Using a Learning Collaborative Strategy With Office-based Practices to Increase Access and Improve Quality of Care for Patients With Opioid Use Disorders
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. R. Nordstrom, E. C. Saunders, B. McLeman, A. Meier, H. Xie, C. Lambert-Harris, B. Tanzman, J. Brooklyn, G. King, N. Kloster, C. F. Lord, W. Roberts, M. P. McGovern
Year: 2016
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Rapidly escalating rates of heroin and prescription opioid use have been widely observed in rural areas across the United States. Although US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for opioid use disorders exist, they are not routinely accessible to patients. One medication, buprenorphine, can be prescribed by waivered physicians in office-based practice settings, but practice patterns vary widely. This study explored the use of a learning collaborative method to improve the provision of buprenorphine in the state of Vermont. METHODS: We initiated a learning collaborative with 4 cohorts of physician practices (28 total practices). The learning collaborative consisted of a series of 4 face-to-face and 5 teleconference sessions over 9 months. Practices collected and reported on 8 quality-improvement data measures, which included the number of patients prescribed buprenorphine, and the percent of unstable patients seen weekly. Changes from baseline to 8 months were examined using a p-chart and logistic regression methodology. RESULTS: Physician engagement in the learning collaborative was favorable across all 4 cohorts (85.7%). On 6 of the 7 quality-improvement measures, there were improvements from baseline to 8 months. On 4 measures, these improvements were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Importantly, practice variation decreased over time on all measures. The number of patients receiving medication increased only slightly (3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the effectiveness of a learning collaborative approach to engage physicians, modestly improve patient access, and significantly reduce practice variation. The strategy is potentially generalizable to other systems and regions struggling with this important public health problem.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10814
Using a multi-level approach to implement a primary care mental health (PCMH) program
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. Kirchner, C. N. Edlund, K. Henderson, L. Daily, L. E. Parker, J. C. Fortney
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
10815
Using buprenorphine for outpatient opioid detoxification
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. J. Manlandro Jr
Year: 2007
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: The Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000) was established to create a new paradigm for medication-assisted treatment of persons with opiate addiction in the United States. Before enactment of DATA 2000, the use of opioid medications to treat patients with opioid addiction was permissible only in federally approved treatment programs, ie, "methadone clinics." The only medications permitted were Schedule II drugs (eg, methadone hydrochloride and l-alpha-acetylmethadol [LAAM]), which could only be dispensed, not prescribed. Under provisions of DATA 2000, qualified physicians in a medical office and other appropriate settings outside the opioid treatment program system may prescribe and/or dispense Schedule III, IV, and V opioid medications for treating persons with opioid addiction if such medications have been specifically approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for that indication. Opioid addiction treatment programs were commonly known as methadone clinics. Such programs now may also dispense buprenorphine hydrochloride and the buprenorphine hydrochloride-naloxone combination.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
10816
Using buprenorphine to facilitate entry into residential therapeutic community rehabilitation
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Eric D. Collins, Terry Horton, Katherine Reinke, Leslie Amass, Edward V. Nunes
Year: 2007
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
10817
Using buprenorphine to treat opioid-dependent university students: Opportunities, successes, and challenges.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Peter A. DeMaria Jr., Robert C. Sterling, Robin Risler, Jeremy Frank
Year: 2010
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
10818
Using choice architecture to integrate substance use services with primary care: Commentary on Donohue et al
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Leo Beletsky
Year: 2018
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
10820
Using digital technology to promote physical health in mental healthcare: A sequential mixed‐methods study of clinicians' views
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Chelsea Sawyer, Lamiece Hassan, John Sainsbury, Rebekah Carney, Sandra Bucci, Harriet Burgess, Karina Lovell, John Torous, Joseph Firth
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection