Email UpdatesLiterature Collection
Collection Insights
11K+
References
9K+
Articles
1500+
Grey Literature
4600+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
12255 Results
2425
Collaboration between mental health professionals and family physicians: A survey of New Jersey family physicians
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2005
Abstract: Abstract. Background: Mental health problems are frequent in primary care, and there are many barriers to their detection and treatment. Clinical research protocols that include close collaboration between mental health professionals and primary care physicians have been found to be beneficial. This study explores the opinions of community family physicians regarding mental health professionals working directly in the primary care office.Method: Members of the New Jersey Academy of Family Physicians (N = 709) were sent a 25-item questionnaire about collaboration with mental health professionals. Three mailings were sent, with a 62% response rate. The surveys were mailed between May and July 1999.Results: Of family physicians included in the analysis, 13.5% reported having an in-office mental health professional. Of those who did not, 60.2% responded that they would consider having one. Compared with physicians who would not consider having an in-office mental health professional, physicians with a mental health professional and those without an in-office mental health professional but who would consider one were statistically more likely (p < .01) to respond that an in-office mental health professional would result in increased use of mental health services, improved acceptance of referrals to mental health professionals, and improved detection and treatment of mental health problems.Conclusion: Although few family physicians have an in-office mental health professional, many more would consider this arrangement and recognize the potential benefits of such collaboration.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Collaboration between mental health professionals and family physicians: A survey of New Jersey family physicians
2428
Collaboration in caring for psychiatric inpatients: Family physicians team up with psychiatrists and psychiatric nurses
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2008
Publication Place: Canada
Abstract: PROBLEM BEING ADDRESSED: The standard organization of psychiatric inpatient care at our hospital involved consultations with various specialist physicians visiting the psychiatry wards to assess patients' medical needs and to provide appropriate interventions. We thought that this type of clinical care pathway might not be leading to the best integration and timeliness of patient care, the most efficient use of specialist resources, or the least cost to the health care system. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To initiate a protocol that would involve an FP visiting all the psychiatry wards daily (on weekdays) to conduct medical consultations. We hoped this program would improve the timeliness and integration of patient care, reduce patients' length of stay in hospital, and alter the pattern of specialist consultations. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The FP consulted on patients referred by psychiatrists and registered psychiatric nurses; carried out assessments; initiated treatment of commonmedical problems; referred to other specialists when necessary; and made arrangements for follow-up care as appropriate. CONCLUSION: The FP consultations improved patient care in several ways, was highly valued by staff, and modified the pattern of specialist consultations on participatingpsychiatry wards.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
2430
Collaboration Leading to Addiction Treatment and Recovery from Other Stresses (CLARO): process of adapting collaborative care for co-occurring opioid use and mental disorders
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2022
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
, Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
2431
Collaboration with medical professionals in clinical practice: Pediatric abdominal pain as a case example
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2012
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Collaboration with medical professionals in clinical practice: Pediatric abdominal pain as a case example
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Collaboration with medical professionals in clinical practice: Pediatric abdominal pain as a case example2435
Collaborative and Integrated Care for Adolescent Depression
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2019
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Collaborative and Integrated Care for Adolescent Depression
2438
CollAborative care and active surveillance for Screen-Positive EldeRs with subthreshold depression (CASPER): a multicentred randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Efforts to reduce the burden of illness and personal suffering associated with depression in older adults have focused on those with more severe depressive syndromes. Less attention has been paid to those with mild disorders/subthreshold depression, but these patients also suffer significant impairments in their quality of life and level of functioning. There is currently no clear evidence-based guidance regarding treatment for this patient group. OBJECTIVES: To establish the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity intervention of collaborative care for primary care older adults who screened positive for subthreshold depression. DESIGN: A pragmatic, multicentred, two-arm, parallel, individually randomised controlled trial with a qualitative study embedded within the pilot. Randomisation occurred after informed consent and baseline measures were collected. SETTING: Thirty-two general practitioner (GP) practices in the north of England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 705 participants aged >/= 75 years during the pilot phase and >/= 65 years during the main trial with subthreshold depression. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the intervention group received a low-intensity intervention of collaborative care, which included behavioural activation delivered by a case manager for an average of six sessions over 7-8 weeks, alongside usual GP care. Control-arm participants received only usual GP care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a self-reported measure of depression severity, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 items PHQ-9 score at 4 months post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures included the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, Short Form questionnaire-12 items, Patient Health Questionnaire-15 items, Generalised Anxiety Disorder seven-item scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale two-item version, a medication questionnaire and objective data. Participants were followed up for 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 705 participants were randomised (collaborative care n = 344, usual care n = 361), with 586 participants (83%; collaborative care 76%, usual care 90%) followed up at 4 months and 519 participants (74%; collaborative care 68%, usual care 79%) followed up at 12 months. Attrition was markedly greater in the collaborative care arm. Model estimates at the primary end point of 4 months revealed a statistically significant effect in favour of collaborative care compared with usual care [mean difference 1.31 score points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 1.95 score points; p < 0.001]. The difference equates to a standard effect size of 0.30, for which the trial was powered. Treatment differences measured by the PHQ-9 were maintained at 12 months' follow-up (mean difference 1.33 score points, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.10 score points; p = 0.001). Base-case cost-effectiveness analysis found that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was pound9633 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). On average, participants allocated to collaborative care displayed significantly higher QALYs than those allocated to the control group (annual difference in adjusted QALYs of 0.044, 95% bias-corrected CI 0.015 to 0.072; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care has been shown to be clinically effective and cost-effective for older adults with subthreshold depression and to reduce the proportion of people who go on to develop case-level depression at 12 months. This intervention could feasibly be delivered in the NHS at an acceptable cost-benefit ratio. Important future work would include investigating the longer-term effect of collaborative care on the CASPER population, which could be conducted by introducing an extension to follow-up, and investigating the impact of collaborative care on managing multimorbidities in people with subthreshold depression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02202951. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection