Literature Collection

OBJECTIVE: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and bipolar disorder are common in primary care. Evidence supports collaborative care in primary care settings to treat depression and anxiety, and recent studies have evaluated its effectiveness in treating complex conditions such as PTSD and bipolar disorder. This study aimed to examine how primary care clinicians experience collaborative care for patients with these more complex psychiatric disorders. METHODS: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 22 primary care clinicians participating in a pragmatic trial that included telepsychiatry collaborative care (TCC) to treat patients with PTSD or bipolar disorder in rural or underserved areas. Analysis utilized a constant comparative method to identify recurring themes. RESULTS: Clinicians reported that TCC improved their confidence in managing medications for patients with PTSD or bipolar disorder and supported their ongoing learning and skill development. Clinicians also reported improvements in patient engagement in care. Care managers were crucial to realizing these benefits by fostering communication within the clinical team while engaging patients through regular outreach. Clinicians valued TCC because it included and supported them in improving the care of patients' mental health conditions, which opened opportunities for clinicians to enhance care and address co-occurring general medical conditions. Overall, benefits of the TCC model outweighed its minimal burdens. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians found that TCC supported their care of patients with PTSD or bipolar disorder. This approach has the potential to extend the reach of specialty mental health care and to support primary care clinicians treating patients with these more complex psychiatric disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Cannabis use among adolescents is prevalent, and clinicians who work with adolescents have unique insights about how to treat cannabis use in this population. METHODS: This qualitative study interviewed 32 clinicians from addiction medicine recovery services (AMRS), the emergency department (ED), mental health (MH), and pediatrics in an integrated healthcare system to understand their perspectives and experiences regarding barriers and facilitators to treating adolescent cannabis use. The analysis was developed using thematic analysis of interviews. RESULTS: Thirty-two clinicians (Mean age = 45.9, SD =7.6; 56.3 % Female; 56.3 % White) were recruited from AMRS (n = 13; 41.6 %), the ED (n = 7; 21.9 %), MH (n = 7; 21.9 %) and pediatrics (n = 5; 15.6 %). Clinicians discussed several key barriers and facilitators of treating adolescent cannabis use. Facilitators include the use of multiple screening tools for adolescent cannabis use (i.e., self-report and toxicology testing) which provide more comprehensive information; patient-centered treatment approaches; and discussing cannabis use in the context of adolescents' mental health. Barriers discussed included adolescents' and parents' minimization of adolescent cannabis use risks. Several factors were discussed as potential facilitators or barriers, depending on context, including the influence of peers, virtual treatment, and parental involvement or lack thereof in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Interviews with clinicians who work with adolescents across settings highlighted factors that serve as barriers and facilitators to treating adolescent cannabis use. These findings have important implications for guiding future research and intervention efforts, including the inclusion of universal screening practices, addressing stigma, reducing adolescents' and parents' minimization of cannabis use-related harms, and improving adolescent and parent engagement in treatment.

BACKGROUND: Many allied health services now provide both telehealth and in-person services following a rapid integration of telehealth as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about how decisions are made about which clinical appointments to provide via telehealth versus in person. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore clinicians' decision-making when contemplating telehealth for their clients, including the factors they consider and how they weigh up these different factors, and the clinicians' perceptions of telehealth utility beyond COVID-19 lockdowns. METHODS: We used reflexive thematic analysis with data collected from focus groups with 16 pediatric community-based allied health clinicians from the disciplines of speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, social work, psychology, and counseling. RESULTS: The findings indicated that decision-making was complex with interactions across 4 broad categories: technology, clients and families, clinical services, and clinicians. Three themes described their perceptions of telehealth use beyond COVID-19 lockdowns: "flexible telehealth use," "telehealth can be superior to in-person therapy," and "fear that in-person services may be replaced." CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the complexity of decision-making in a community-allied health setting and the challenges experienced by clinicians when reconciling empirical evidence with their own clinical experience.

OBJECTIVE: The authors aim to measure differences in primary care clinicians' (PCC's) perceptions of managing pediatric mental health before and after launch of a child psychiatry access program (the access program) and identify the impact of engaging trainees from child psychiatry, pediatrics, and family medicine in administration and use of this program. METHODS: Child psychiatry fellows provide coverage of a grant-funded state-wide access program and engage trainee-peers in learning how to use the program. A survey measuring PCC's experience managing children's mental health conditions was administered before and after the child psychiatry access program launched. Rotation evaluations collect trainee's feedback. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences are identified before and after the program's launch in PCC's perception of access to child psychiatry (U = 294.5, p < 0.001) and between PCC's perceptions of the impact of behavioral health problems in their patients in those with less than 4 years post-residency training compared with those with 4 or more years post-residency (U = 524.5, p < .01). Trainee evaluation of the rotation is consistently positive (average 5:6 rating). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that (1) the presence of a state-wide access program positively impacts PCC's reported access to child psychiatry; (2) child psychiatry fellows rate the clinical rotation experience favorably; and (3) there appears to be an association between less time out of primary care residency training and perception of improved access to child psychiatry and less clinical burden from behavioral health issues. Further research is required to understand the impact of a training in this model.

In years past, an adolescent patient presenting to primary care with symptoms of opioid use disorder (OUD) would have been a highly rare event in most communities. With OUD and fatal overdoses rising among adolescents and young adults (termed youth) over the past 15 years, this scenario has unfortunately become more common. Fatal drug overdoses increased 3.5-fold for youth aged 15 to 24 years from 1999 to 2014.1 Amidst this epidemic, relatively little is known about how primary care clinicians treat youth with OUD. Of particular interest is whether youth receive medication-assisted treatments (MATs), which have been shown to improve quality of life and reduce overdose risk.2