Email UpdatesLiterature Collection
Collection Insights
13K+
References
11K+
Articles
1700+
Grey Literature
4800+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 13,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
13126 Results
1841
Beliefs about the causes of health complaints: a study in primary care
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2009
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
In public and interpersonal health communication, a need exists to explore the nature of lay beliefs about health complaints to achieve effective communication. Beliefs of patients visiting their family physician/general practitioner (GP) may give insight into this matter. The aim of this study was to investigate the spectrum of causes attributed to different categories of health complaints presented at the GP office. Before visiting their GP, 2,253 individuals completed a questionnaire about their health complaint and the cause they attributed to this complaint. The spectrum of causes attributed to all health complaints was compared between distinct categories of health complaints. Sixty-two percent of the GP patients attributed at least 1 cause to health complaints they presented at the GP office. Thirty-eight percent of GP patients did not attribute a cause to the health complaint they presented at the GP office. Patient beliefs differed across distinct health problems. Lay beliefs seemed to differ from basic notions of illness because patients attributed different causes to different health complaints. These differences in beliefs, when patients choose to share them with their GP, may serve as a starting point for the communication between the patients and the GP to achieve an effective communication. A need seems to emerge to discriminate between lay beliefs regarding the nature of specific illnesses and those regarding basic notions. GPs are therefore advised to attend to, or at least ask for, their patients' views specifically.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Beliefs about the causes of health complaints: a study in primary care
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Beliefs about the causes of health complaints: a study in primary care
1842
Beliefs and attitudes about opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: Survey of primary care providers
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2014
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: There is growing concern of medication misuse and noncompliance among patients with chronic pain prescribed opioids for pain. The aim of this survey was to obtain information from primary care providers (PCPs) about their perception of prescribing opioids for patients with chronic pain. METHODS: PCPs were invited to complete a packet of questionnaires about attitudes and concerns about opioids for chronic pain. These questionnaires included 1) General Health Questionnaire, 2) Test of Opioid Knowledge (TOK), 3) Opioid Therapy Provider Survey, and 4) Concerns About Analgesic Prescription Questionnaire. RESULTS: Fifty-six (N = 56) PCPs from eight centers participated in this study. In general, the PCPs showed adequate opioid knowledge on the KOT and their general health was unrelated to prescription attitudes. Most expressed concern about medication misuse (89 percent) and felt that managing patients with chronic pain was stressful (84 percent). Most were worried about addiction (82 percent) and less than half felt that they were sufficiently trained in prescribing opioids (46 percent). Younger providers felt more reluctant to prescribe opioids, experienced more stress in managing patients with pain, had less overall confidence in managing patients with pain, and worried more about opioid dependence than older providers (p < 0.05). Younger providers were also less knowledgeable about opioids, but opioid knowledge was not found to be related to concerns about analgesic prescriptions. CONCLUSION: This study indicates a general concern and reluctance of primary care physicians to manage the prescribing of opioids among their patients with chronic pain and younger providers expressed more concern about opioids than older providers.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Beliefs and attitudes about opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: Survey of primary care providers
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Beliefs and attitudes about opioid prescribing and chronic pain management: Survey of primary care providers
1845
Benchmarks for Reducing Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Through Community Health Workers Integrated Into Primary Care: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2017
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Uncertainty about the financial costs and benefits of community health worker (CHW) programs remains a barrier to their adoption. OBJECTIVES: To determine how much CHWs would need to reduce emergency department (ED) visits and associated hospitalizations among their assigned patients to be cost-neutral from a payer's perspective. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using a microsimulation of patient health care utilization, costs, and revenues, we estimated what portion of ED visits and hospitalizations for different conditions would need to be prevented by a CHW program to fully pay for the program's expenses. The model simulated CHW programs enrolling patients with a history of at least 1 ED visit for a chronic condition in the prior year, utilizing data on utilization and cost from national sources. RESULTS: CHWs assigned to patients with uncontrolled hypertension and congestive heart failure, as compared with other common conditions, achieve cost-neutrality with the lowest number of averted visits to the ED. To achieve cost-neutrality, 4-5 visits to the ED would need to be averted per year by a CHW assigned a panel of 70 patients with uncontrolled hypertension or congestive heart failure-approximately 3%-4% of typical ED visits among such patients, respectively. Most other chronic conditions would require between 7% and 12% of ED visits to be averted to achieve cost-savings. CONCLUSION: Offsetting costs of a CHW program is theoretically feasible for many common conditions. Yet the benchmark for reducing ED visits and associated hospitalizations varies substantially by a patient's primary diagnosis.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
1847
Benefit-cost analysis of brief physician advice with problem drinkers in primary care settings
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2000
Publication Place:
UNITED STATES
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Few studies have estimated the economic costs and benefits of brief physician advice in managed care settings. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a benefit-cost analysis of brief physician advice regarding problem drinking. DESIGN: Patient and health care costs associated with brief advice were compared with economic benefits associated with changes in health care utilization, legal events, and motor vehicle accidents using 6- and 12-month follow-up data from Project TrEAT (Trial for Early Alcohol Treatment), a randomized controlled clinical trial. SUBJECTS: 482 men and 292 women who reported drinking above a threshold limit were randomized into control (n = 382) or intervention (n = 392) groups. MEASURES: Outcomes included alcohol use, emergency department visits, hospital days, legal events, and motor vehicle accidents. RESULTS: No significant differences between control and intervention subjects were present for baseline alcohol use, age, socioeconomic status, smoking, depression or anxiety, conduct disorders, drug use, crimes, motor vehicle accidents, or health care utilization. The total economic benefit of the brief intervention was $423,519 (95% CI: $35,947, $884,848), composed of $195,448 (95% CI: $36,734, $389,160) in savings in emergency department and hospital use and $228,071 (95% CI: -$191,419, $757,303) in avoided costs of crime and motor vehicle accidents. The average (per subject) benefit was $1,151 (95% CI: $92, $2,257). The estimated total economic cost of the intervention was $80,210, or $205 per subject. The benefit-cost ratio was 5.6:1 (95% CI: 0.4, 11.0), or $56,263 in total benefit for every $10,000 invested. CONCLUSIONS: These results offer the first quantitative evidence that implementation of a brief intervention for problem drinkers can generate positive net benefit for patients, the health care system, and society.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the PubMed citation for Benefit-cost analysis of brief physician advice with problem drinkers in primary care settings
1848
Benefits of a primary care clinic co-located and integrated in a mental health setting for veterans with serious mental illness
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2012
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION: Efficacy trials have shown that primary care co-located in the mental health setting improves the receipt of high-quality medical care among people with serious mental illness. We tested whether implementation of such a program affected health service use and cardiovascular risk factor control among veterans with serious mental illness who had previously demonstrated limited primary care engagement. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of veterans enrolled in a co-located, integrated primary care clinic in the mental health outpatient unit through targeted chart review. Two successive 6-month periods in the year before and in the year following enrollment in the co-located primary care clinic were examined for primary care and emergency department use and for goal attainment of blood pressure, fasting blood lipids, body mass index (BMI), and, among patients with diabetes, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). We used repeated-measures logistic regression to analyze goal attainment and repeated measures Poisson regression to analyze service use. RESULTS: Compared with the period before enrollment, the 97 veterans enrolled in the clinic had significantly more primary care visits during 6 months and significantly improved goal attainment for blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and BMI. Changes with regard to goal attainment for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and HbA1c were not significant. CONCLUSION: Enrollment in a co-located, integrated clinic was associated with increased primary care use and improved attainment of some cardiovascular risk goals among veterans with serious mental illness. Such a clinic can be implemented effectively in the mental health setting.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy
See topic collection
1849
Benefits of integrated behavioral health services: The physician perspective
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2016
Publication Place:
United States
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Benefits of integrated behavioral health services: The physician perspective
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Benefits of integrated behavioral health services: The physician perspective
1852
Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2006
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Brief clinician intervention and telephone counseling are both effective aids for smoking cessation. However, the potential benefit of telephone care above and beyond routine clinician intervention has not been examined previously. The objective of this study is to determine if telephone care increases smoking cessation compared with brief clinician intervention as part of routine health care. METHODS: This 2-group, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 837 daily smokers from 5 Veterans Affairs medical centers in the upper Midwest. The telephone care group (n = 417) received behavioral counseling with mailing of smoking cessation medications as clinically indicated. The standard care group (n = 420) received intervention as part of routine health care. The primary outcome was self-reported 6-month duration of abstinence 12 months after enrollment. Secondary outcomes were 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 3 and 12 months, participation in counseling programs, and use of smoking cessation medications. RESULTS: Using intention-to-treat procedures, we found that the rate of 6-month abstinence at the 12-month follow-up was 13.0% in the telephone care group and 4.1% in the standard care group (odds ratio [OR], 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-6.15). The rate of 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 3 months was 39.6% in the telephone care group and 10.1% in the standard care group (OR, 5.84; 95% CI, 4.02-8.50). Telephone care compared with standard care increased the rates of participation in counseling programs (97.1% vs 24.0%; OR, 96.22; 95% CI, 52.57-176.11) and use of smoking cessation medications (89.6% vs 52.3%; OR, 7.85; 95% CI, 5.34-11.53). CONCLUSION: Telephone care increases the use of behavioral and pharmacologic assistance and leads to higher smoking cessation rates compared with routine health care provider intervention.
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Benefits of telephone care over primary care for smoking cessation: a randomized trial
1853
Benzodiazepine maintenance in opiate substitution treatment: Good or bad? A retrospective primary care case-note review
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2017
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Co-prescribing benzodiazepines to patients in opiate substitution treatment is controversial and often alleged to increase mortality. In an inner-London general practice, patients with problematic benzodiazepine co-dependence were allowed benzodiazepine maintenance treatment (BMT) since 1994, providing an opportunity for analysis. METHOD: 1) Case-note review of all 278 opiate substitution treatment patients, accruing 1289 patient treatment years; 46% had concurrent BMT. 2) National Health Service database search for patients who died after leaving accrued a further 883 years of information; only patients who left the UK were unaccounted for (4%). Three groups were studied: 1) never obtained benzodiazepine prescription (NOB): n=80); 2) briefly/occasionally prescribed benzodiazepines (BOP): n=71; 3) BMT: n=127. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Treatment retention (months); deaths/100 patient treatment years; deaths after leaving the service/100 years of information. RESULTS: Treatment retention: NOB: 34 months; BOP: 51 months; BMT: 72 months. In-treatment mortality: NOB: 1.79/100 patient treatment years; BOP: 0.33/100 patient treatment years; BMT: 1.31/100 patient treatment years. Deaths after leaving service: NOB: 2.24/100 years of information, BOP: 0.63/100 years of information. However, mortality for previously BMT-patients increased by 450% to 5.90/100 years of information. DISCUSSION: BMT patients had longer treatment retention than NOB or BOP and lower mortality than NOB patients. It is unlikely that patients had access to prescribed benzodiazepines on leaving the service because of restrictions in the national guidelines but co-dependent patients are a high-risk group who may stand to gain most benefit from opiate substitution treatment if combined with benzodiazepine-maintenance.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Benzodiazepine maintenance in opiate substitution treatment: Good or bad? A retrospective primary care case-note review
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Benzodiazepine maintenance in opiate substitution treatment: Good or bad? A retrospective primary care case-note review
1854
Benzodiazepine-Involved Overdose Deaths in the USA: 2000-2019
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2022
Publication Place:
United States
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
, Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Benzodiazepine-Involved Overdose Deaths in the USA: 2000-2019
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Benzodiazepine-Involved Overdose Deaths in the USA: 2000-2019
1855
Best clinical practice: guidelines for managing major depression in primary medical care
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
1999
Abstract:
Abstract: Practice guidelines such as those of the United States Public Health Service Agency for Health Care Policy and Research have been instrumental in addressing the significant problem of how best to manage major depression in primary medical care settings. Since this set of guidelines was published in 1993, new findings from randomized clinical trials and extensive clinical experience permit us to reevaluate trends in treatment of major depression in primary medical care. This review suggests guidelines for achieving best clinical practice given current knowledge.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the PubMed citation for Best clinical practice: guidelines for managing major depression in primary medical care
1858
Best practices for assessing competence and performance of the behavioral health workforce
Type:
Journal Article
Year:
2005
Publication Place:
United States
Abstract:
The need for mechanisms to assess the competence and performance of the behavioral health workforce has received increasing attention. This article reviews strategies used in general medicine and other disciplines for assessing trainees and practitioners. The possibilities and limitations of various approaches are reviewed, and the implications for behavioral health are addressed. A conceptual model of competence is presented, and practical applications of this model are reviewed. Finally, guidelines are proposed for building competency assessment protocols for behavioral health.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the PubMed citation for Best practices for assessing competence and performance of the behavioral health workforce