Literature Collection

The HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-term) Communities Study (HCS) aims to test the effectiveness of the Communities That HEAL intervention in decreasing opioid overdose deaths in 67 communities across four U.S. states. This intervention enlists a collaborative team of researchers, academic experts, and community coalitions to select and implement interventions from a menu of evidence-based practices, including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). The HCS's New York team developed an integrated network systems (INS) approach with a mapping tool to coach coalitions in the selection of strategies to enhance medication treatment. With the INS approach, community coalitions develop a map of service delivery venues in their local county to better engage people with medication treatment wherever this need arises. The map is structured around core services that can provide maintenance MOUD and satellite services, which include all settings where people with opioid use disorder are encountered and can be identified, possibly given medication, and referred to core programs for ongoing MOUD care. This article describes the rationale for the INS mapping tool, with a discussion framed by the consolidated framework for implementation research, and provides a case example of its application.

OBJECTIVES: Telehealth treatment with medication for opioid use disorder (teleMOUD) was made possible with regulations following the COVID-19 pandemic that permitted prescribing buprenorphine without an in-person visit. This study evaluates the self-reported outcomes of patients treated by teleMOUD using the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM), a 17-question tool that assesses drug use, cravings, physical and psychological health, and psychosocial factors to produce 3 subset scores: substance use, risk factors, and protective factors. METHODS: Patients treated by a teleMOUD provider group operating in >30 states were asked to complete an app-based version of BAM at enrollment and at 1 month. Patients who completed both assessments between June 2022 and March 2023 were included. RESULTS: A total of 2556 patients completed an enrollment BAM and 1447 completed both assessments. Mean number of days from baseline BAM to follow-up was 26.7 days. Changes were significantly different across most questions. The substance use subscale decreased from mean 2.6 to 0.8 (P < .001), the risk factors subscale decreased from mean 10.3 to 7.5 (P < .001), and the protective factors subscale increased from mean 14.3 to 15.0. (P < .001). Substance use and risk factor subscale changes were significant across all sex and age groups, while protective factors subscale did not improve for those <25 and >54 years. Patient reports of at least 1 day of illegal use or misuse decreased, including marijuana (28.1% vs 9.0%), cocaine/crack (3.9% vs 2.6%), and opioids (49.8% vs 10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated by teleMOUD who completed assessments at enrollment and 1 month, there was improvement in drug use, risk factor, and protective factor scores.

The COVID-19 pandemic is a particularly grave risk to the millions of Americans with opioid use disorder, who—already vulnerable and marginalized—are heavily dependent on face-to-face health care delivery. These authors propose rapid and coordinated action on the part of clinicians and policymakers to mitigate risks of disrupted care for these patients.

Today's era of integrated working seeks to bring together different professionals to work in patient-centered teams. As a result leadership perspectives have changed. We now seek leaders who recognize the complexity of moderating across different health, social care and other public and private sector organizations for collective patient/community focussed service. This research focuses on the role of leaders in the UK who were asked to lead a range of practitioners working from Children's Centers. These centers brought together a myriad of practitioners from health, social care, and education to meet the needs of children from wide and diverse backgrounds. We share a qualitative study, exploring the experiences of Children's Center leaders, using critical theory and constructivism. The study explored how leaders enable integrated working to flourish. The research was conducted in two stages: In Stage One, five strategic Children's Center managers were interviewed to illuminate the key ingredients felt to support good leaders. Stage Two brought together 10 Children's Center leaders from across different areas of the UK, to share their experiences using Participatory Action Research. The final synthesis identified four main processes which could help leaders to enable integrated working to flourish. These were: i) Thinking Systematically; ii) Building and re-building relationships; ii) Nourishing self-actualization and; iv) Utilizing alternative approaches to problem solving. Four borderline processes were identified: Interaction, Integrity, Flow and Sensitivity. The final model articulates the skills required to lead integrated services which bring together a wide range of practitioners. The outcomes help leaders to explore new ways of leading and require further testing. The outcomes may apply to other clinical areas of integrated working.