Literature Collection

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of Strengthening Care for Children (SC4C) for reducing the number of referrals by general practitioners of patients under 18 years of age to hospital services. STUDY DESIGN: Stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial; data collected for up to 16 months after the intervention. SETTING: General practices in North Western Melbourne and Central and Eastern Sydney primary health networks, 1 May 2021-30 September 2023. PARTICIPANTS: General practitioners who worked at least two clinical sessions each week, saw patients under 18 years of age, and for whom at least 1 month of referrals data during the control period were available; families of people under 18 years attending these practices. INTERVENTION: Weekly (6 months) then fortnightly (6 months) general practitioner-paediatrician co-consultations; monthly paediatrician-led case discussions; weekday phone and email support by paediatricians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of general practitioner visits in which patients were referred to publicly funded hospital outpatient clinics or emergency departments (patient level), overall and by baseline referral rate. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Referrals after completion of the intervention; general practitioner confidence regarding child health care; low value care for frequent childhood conditions; family preference for general practitioner or paediatrician care. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty participating general practitioners from 22 general practices conducted 50,101 consultations during the control period; 125 general practitioners from 21 general practices received the intervention and undertook 96,804 consultations. Patients were referred to hospitals in 2.3% of control period consultations and 1.9% of intervention period consultations (risk difference, -0.34 [95% confidence interval {CI}, -0.69 to 0.004] percentage points). Among general practitioners with high referral rates at baseline (5% or higher), patients were referred to hospital outpatient or emergency department in 7.3% of control period consultations and in 3.0% of intervention period consultations (risk difference, -4.28 [95% CI, -6.59 to -1.97] percentage points); the referral rate was also lower after the intervention period (sustainability vs. control periods: 2.9% vs. 5.8%; risk difference, -2.92 [95% CI, -5.36 to -0.48] percentage points). The proportions of general practitioners confident about their knowledge and skills regarding child health care were larger during the intervention than the control period. Quality of care and family preference for general practitioner-led care for their children remained high across the study. No adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Strengthening primary care for children reduces the frequency of hospital referrals of children by general practitioners with high referral rates, increases rates of general practitioner confidence about caring for children and maintains family preference for general practitioner-led care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620001299998 (prospective).; THE KNOWN: The demand for hospital outpatient and emergency services for children is rising in high income countries. Integrated care models in which paediatricians support care by general practitioners could reduce the number of hospital referrals. THE NEW: An integrated general practitioner–paediatrician model did not reduce hospital referrals overall, but sustainably reduced referrals of children by general practitioners who had previously referred 5% or more of patients under 18 years of age. THE IMPLICATIONS: To relieve pressure on hospitals and improve equitable access to specialist care, this care model could be expanded to include general practices in areas with high numbers of children and general practitioners with high referral rates.; eng

BACKGROUND: Children living in regional and rural Australia have diminished health outcomes and are more likely to be developmentally vulnerable on one or more domains compared to urban peers. Despite this, children in regional and rural Australia often cannot access specialist care due to lack of availability, financial constraints, or waiting times of over 12 months. Strengthening Care for Rural Children (SC4RC) aims to evaluate an integrated general practitioner (GP)-paediatrician model of care in rural communities to enhance the quality of paediatric care by ensuring children receive timely, accessible care within their communities by reducing referrals to public and private paediatric services. METHODS: SC4RC is a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial of 22 general practice clinics in regional and rural Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Control data for each general practice clinic will be collected for a minimum of 1 month and each clinic will be randomly allocated a start month, with the intervention running for 11 months at each clinic. The intervention will consist of fortnightly GP-paediatrician co-consultation sessions, weekday phone and email paediatrician support for GPs, and access to a paediatric online community of practice via a Project ECHO™ series. The primary outcome is the proportion of paediatric (0 to <18 years) GP appointments that result in a referral to a paediatric service (hospital emergency departments, outpatient clinics, or private paediatricians) during the intervention period compared with the control period. Secondary outcomes include GP quality of care across 17 common childhood conditions, GP confidence in paediatric care, family confidence in GP care, and the sustainability of the SC4RC model. Integral to the project is our consumer engagement framework which will inform the translation and implementation of the project. An implementation evaluation will assess the acceptability, adaptability, and scalability of the model, whilst a health economic evaluation will measure the cost-effectiveness/benefit of the intervention. DISCUSSION: This protocol paper outlines how we will partner with primary care organisations and paediatric services to implement and evaluate SC4RC in some regional and rural communities in Victoria and NSW. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000550606. Registered on 23 May 2023.

BACKGROUND: Individuals experiencing serious mental illness (SMI) have higher rates of comorbid physical health conditions, poorer associated health outcomes, and die on average 10-20 years earlier than the general population. They encounter multiple barriers to accessing appropriate physical health care in many countries, including Canada, where policies and practices to promote integrated care delivery to this population remain scant. This qualitative study aimed to explore health provider perspectives and experiences with integrated physical and mental health care within mental health settings in Canada, in efforts to address the health needs of this population. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study involved conducting individual semi-structured interviews with 13 health administrators and four focus groups with 15 clinicians between July 2023 and April 2024. The data analysis team, inclusive of individuals with SMI, used thematic analysis to identify overarching themes that capture participants' perspectives on and experiences with delivering integrated physical and mental health care within mental health settings in Canada, including their clinical practices and organizational contexts. RESULTS: We identified four themes in participant narratives: (1) the need for integrated care delivery within mental health settings; (2) organizational readiness for integrated care; (3) moving integration forward: addressing challenges; and (4) leveraging opportunities to advance integrated care. Both participant groups highlighted challenges with fragmented healthcare services, emphasized the urgent need for policies, practices and guidelines that support person-centered, comprehensive care within mental health settings, and called for engaging people with living/lived experience and family members in service redesign. CONCLUSION: Findings underscore the importance of accelerating efforts to promote integrated health care delivery for adults with SMI within mental health settings, and of implementing policies that address health disparities for this population in the Canadian context. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not Applicable.

Individuals living with serious mental illness (SMI) face significant barriers to accessing appropriate physical health care, poorer associated health outcomes and premature mortality compared to the general population. This scoping review examines service delivery models and clinical practices supporting the integration of physical health care for adults with SMI within mental health settings, and their outcomes. Searches of four academic databases yielded 65 academic articles. Most integrated service delivery models were implemented in community mental health settings in the United States and incorporated elements of Wagner's Chronic Care Model, emphasizing delivery-system redesign, patient self-management support and use of clinical information systems. In most outcome studies, integrated care models were associated with improvements in primary care access and preventative screening rates, while other physical health indicators and emergency and inpatient service use demonstrated promising but mixed results. Implementation challenges of integrated service delivery models included securing financial resources and maintaining effective use of clinical information systems, among others. Successful implementation was facilitated by effective teamwork, care coordination, and administrative and leadership support. Study findings highlight the complexity of integrating physical health care in mental health settings, and the longer timeframes needed to observe changes in some outcomes. The review further underscores the need for ongoing efforts to advance integrated care delivery in mental health settings and the importance of longitudinal data collection to fully assess and optimize the implementation and outcomes of these interventions. Systematic Review Registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3T9VK.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) have higher rates of comorbid physical health conditions, poorer associated health outcomes, and die on average 10-20 years earlier than the general population. This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives and experiences of adults living with SMI and family members with accessing physical healthcare within primary and mental health settings in Canada. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with 20 adults living with SMI and five focus groups with 18 family members between July 2023 and April 2024. After coding by two authors, thematic analysis was completed with the support of a data analysis team to identify overarching themes capturing participant experiences with accessing physical healthcare, care needs and preferences. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from participant narratives: (1) The centrality of mental health problems in the lives of people with SMI; (2) Challenges in accessing physical healthcare; (3) The role of families in supporting access to care; (4) Perceived health priorities and preferences. There was a high degree of congruence between the perspectives of individuals living with SMI and family members. Both participant groups described challenges accessing primary care settings, fragmented health services, and a desire for person-centred, whole-person health within mental health settings, with family member support where available. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study highlight the need for advancing the integration of physical healthcare within mental health settings for adults living with SMI, who are less likely to engage with community-based primary care services. Enhanced access to physical healthcare could leverage multidisciplinary resources in these settings and partnerships with families. These findings can inform efforts to provide whole-person healthcare for individuals experiencing SMI. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The study team collaborated closely with community organizations and individuals with lived experience at every stage of this research. This included contributions to the funding proposal, the study protocol, participant recruitment, study materials, data analysis and preparing the manuscript. Individuals with lived experience and family members actively participated in management and project meetings for the duration of the study.

Initiatives that support and incentivize the integration of behavioral health and general medical care have become a focus of government strategies to achieve the triple aim of improved health, better patient experience, and reduced costs. The authors describe the components of four large-scale national initiatives aimed at integrating care for a wide range of behavioral health needs. Commonalities across these national initiatives highlight health care and social services needs that must be addressed to improve care for people with co-occurring behavioral health and general medical conditions. These findings can inform how to design, test, select, and align the most promising strategies for integrated care in a variety of settings.