Literature Collection

PURPOSE: Excessive narcotization in pediatric surgical patients has not been well characterized. This report describes the use of postoperative naloxone in pediatric patients. METHODS: Pediatric surgical patients from January 1, 2010, through June 30, 2016, who underwent general anesthesia and received naloxone within 48 h postoperatively were identified and matched 1:1 with controls by age, sex, and procedure. Cases and controls underwent retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients received naloxone, with a rate of 2.0 (95% CI 1.5-2.7) per 1000 anesthetics. Indications were respiratory depression (n = 19), facilitating extubation (n = 15), and reversing sedation (n = 13), and 44 cases received naloxone in a monitored environment. The median (interquartile range) naloxone dose was 4.0 (2.0-23.5) mcg/kg, and five patients (11%) later required subsequent naloxone treatments. Their characteristics were similar to controls, including opioid medications, except cases that had signs of respiratory depression before naloxone administration. The outcomes were similar, although more cases were admitted to the intensive care unit before naloxone administration. One patient died 13 days postoperatively of unrelated causes. CONCLUSION: Postoperative naloxone administration in pediatric patients is rare. The observation that most administrations occurred in a monitored setting implies that at-risk patients had been appropriately identified and kept under closer surveillance.

Objective: We examined the change in pediatric primary care clinician attitudes and perceptions about telemedicine after one year of telemedicine use. Methods: We administered a survey to pediatric primary care clinicians across 50 primary care practices in Pennsylvania in 2020 and 2021. Surveys were linked using a combination of deterministic and probabilistic matching. We used McNemar's test to compare change in responses from 2020 to 2021. Results: Among pediatric primary care clinicians surveyed in 2020 and 2021 (n = 101), clinicians agreed that telemedicine could always or usually deliver high-quality care for mental health (80% in 2020 and 78% in 2021), care coordination (77% in 2020 and 70% in 2021), acute care (33% in 2020 and 34% in 2021), or preventive care (25% in 2020 and 18% in 2021) and this did not significantly change. Clinician perceptions of usability, while high, declined over time with fewer endorsing ease of use (93% in 2020 and 80% in 2021) and reliability (14% in 2020 and 0% in 2021) over time. Despite this, 62% of clinicians agreed that they were satisfied with their use of telemedicine at both time points. Respondents anticipated positive impact on equity and timeliness of care from telemedicine use but did not anticipate positive impact across child health, health care delivery, or clinician experience. Perceptions across these domains did not change over time. Conclusions: With one year of telemedicine experience, primary care clinicians maintained beliefs that telemedicine could deliver high-quality care for specific clinical needs but had worsening perceptions of usability over time.