Literature Collection

Magnifying Glass
Collection Insights

11K+

References

9K+

Articles

1500+

Grey Literature

4600+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Enter Search Term(s)
Year
Sort by
Order
Show
11272 Results
7921
Primary care mental health services in Qatar
Type: Journal Article
Authors: O. Wadoo, M. A. S. Ahmed, S. Reagu, S. A. Al Abdulla, M. A. Y. A. Al Abdulla
Year: 2021
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
7922
Primary care mental health workers: Models of working and evidence of effectiveness
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. Bower
Year: 2002
Publication Place: England
Abstract: The NHS Plan proposed the creation of a new role in primary care to assist with the management of common mental health problems: the primary care mental health worker (PCMHW). However, it is not clear how PCMHWs should be employed to be most effective. Current literature concerning different models of mental health care is reviewed. This suggests that four key dimensions are of relevance: the types of patients that PCMHWs will manage; the degree to which PCMHWs will work autonomously, or as part of a system of care; at what stage in patients' illness trajectory they will intervene; and whether the role of PCMHWs will be related to clinical interventions, or whether they will have a wider, non-clinical role in the organisation and monitoring of care. Finally, published data concerning relevant interventions are presented. Experimental studies reporting the empirical outcomes associated with these models are reviewed in relation to four different outcomes: clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and access to care. The data suggest that problem-solving therapy, group psycho-education, self-help, and some models of 'collaborative care' may be highly relevant to PCMHWs. Each model provides different advantages and disadvantages in terms of the four dimensions of outcome.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7923
Primary care mental health workers: Role expectations, conflict and ambiguity
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. Bower, S. Jerrim, L. Gask
Year: 2004
Publication Place: England
Abstract: A number of professionals are involved in mental health in primary care. The NHS Plan proposed the introduction of a new professional, the primary care mental health worker (PCMHW), to improve care in this setting. The present study was conducted to examine pilot PCMHW-type roles currently in existence, to explore staff expectations concerning the new PCMHW role and to consider the issues relating to roles in primary care mental health that are raised by this new worker. The study used a case study design, and involved qualitative interviews with 46 managers and clinicians from primary care and specialist mental health services, including pilot PCMHW-type roles. The key findings were as follows: The pilot PCMHW-type roles were almost exclusively related to client work, whereas respondents had far wider role expectations of the new PCMHWs, relating to perceived gaps in current service provision. This highlights the potential for role conflict. Secondly, there was disagreement and ambiguity among some respondents as to the nature of the new PCMHW's role in client work, and its relationship with the work undertaken by other mental health professionals such as counsellors, psychologists and nurses. Given that multiple professionals are involved in mental health care in primary care, issues relating to roles are likely to be crucial in the effective implementation of the new PCMHWs.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7924
Primary care models and depression outcomes in rural adult populations: A systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Eleanor Turi, Suzanne E. Courtwright, Justinna Dixon, Isabella O'Neill, Michelle Marchiano, Lusine Poghosyan
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
7926
Primary care monitoring of depressive symptoms in young people
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. Hetrick, M. Simmons, L. A. Sanci, J. Gunn
Year: 2014
Publication Place: Australia
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Monitoring depressive symptoms and suicidality is essential in the management of depression in young people, yet routine monitoring is rare. This qualitative study sought to explore the experiences and beliefs of general practitioners about factors associated with monitoring youth depression in primary care settings. METHODS: Two focus groups with general practitioners (n = 12) were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. A semi-structured interview schedule was used. RESULTS: In the primary care setting, monitoring was perceived as part of a continuum of care that begins with screening and diagnosis and as beneficial mostly in regards to informing treatment planning. Benefits and risks were reported, along with challenges and facilitators. DISCUSSION: Monitoring youth depression in primary care settings is perceived as both beneficial and potentially risky. Monitoring tools need to inform treatment planning, be brief and fit within existing electronic software used by general practitioners.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
7927
Primary care nursing activities with patients affected by physical chronic disease and common mental disorders: A qualitative descriptive study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Ariane Girard, Catherine Hudon, Marie-?ve Poitras, Pasquale Roberge, Maud-?hristine Chouinard
Year: 2017
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
7928
Primary Care Office-based Buprenorphine Treatment: Comparison of Heroin and Prescription Opioid Dependent Patients
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. A. Moore, D. A. Fiellin, D. T. Barry, L. E. Sullivan, M. C. Chawarski, P. G. O'Connor, R. S. Schottenfeld
Year: 2007
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid dependence is increasing, but treatment outcomes with office-based buprenorphine/naloxone among these patients have not been described. METHODS: We compared demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes among 200 patients evaluated for entry into a trial of primary care office-based buprenorphine/naloxone treatment stratifying on those who reported exclusive heroin use (n = 124), heroin and prescription opioid use (n = 47), or only prescription opioid use (n = 29). RESULTS: Compared to heroin-only patients, prescription-opioid-only patients were younger, had fewer years of opioid use, and less drug treatment history. They were also more likely to be white, earned more income, and were less likely to have Hepatitis C antibodies. Prescription-opioid-only patients were more likely to complete treatment (59% vs. 30%), remained in treatment longer (21.0 vs. 14.2� weeks), and had a higher percent of opioid-negative urine samples than heroin only patients (56.3% vs. 39.8%), all p values < .05. Patients who used both heroin and prescription opioids had outcomes that were intermediate between heroin-only and prescription-opioid-only patients. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals dependent on prescription opioids have an improved treatment response to buprenorphine/naloxone maintenance in an office-based setting compared to those who exclusively or episodically use heroin.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7929
PRimary Care Opioid Use Disorders treatment (PROUD) trial protocol: a pragmatic, cluster-randomized implementation trial in primary care for opioid use disorder treatment
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. I. Campbell, A. J. Saxon, D. M. Boudreau, P. D. Wartko, J. F. Bobb, A. K. Lee, A. G. Matthews, J. McCormack, D. S. Liu, M. Addis, A. Altschuler, J. H. Samet, C. T. LaBelle, J. Arnsten, R. M. Caldeiro, D. T. Borst, A. L. Stotts, J. M. Braciszewski, J. Szapocznik, G. Bart, R. P. Schwartz, J. McNeely, J. M. Liebschutz, J. I. Tsui, J. O. Merrill, J. E. Glass, G. T. Lapham, S. M. Murphy, Z. M. Weinstein, B. J. H. Yarborough, K. A. Bradley
Year: 2021
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Most people with opioid use disorder (OUD) never receive treatment. Medication treatment of OUD in primary care is recommended as an approach to increase access to care. The PRimary Care Opioid Use Disorders treatment (PROUD) trial tests whether implementation of a collaborative care model (Massachusetts Model) using a nurse care manager (NCM) to support medication treatment of OUD in primary care increases OUD treatment and improves outcomes. Specifically, it tests whether implementation of collaborative care, compared to usual primary care, increases the number of days of medication for OUD (implementation objective) and reduces acute health care utilization (effectiveness objective). The protocol for the PROUD trial is presented here. METHODS: PROUD is a hybrid type III cluster-randomized implementation trial in six health care systems. The intervention consists of three implementation strategies: salary for a full-time NCM, training and technical assistance for the NCM, and requiring that three primary care providers have DEA waivers to prescribe buprenorphine. Within each health system, two primary care clinics are randomized: one to the intervention and one to Usual Primary Care. The sample includes all patients age 16-90 who visited the randomized primary care clinics from 3 years before to 2 years after randomization (anticipated to be > 170,000). Quantitative data are derived from existing health system administrative data, electronic medical records, and/or health insurance claims ("electronic health records," [EHRs]). Anonymous staff surveys, stakeholder debriefs, and observations from site visits, trainings and technical assistance provide qualitative data to assess barriers and facilitators to implementation. The outcome for the implementation objective (primary outcome) is a clinic-level measure of the number of patient days of medication treatment of OUD over the 2 years post-randomization. The patient-level outcome for the effectiveness objective (secondary outcome) is days of acute care utilization [e.g. urgent care, emergency department (ED) and/or hospitalizations] over 2 years post-randomization among patients with documented OUD prior to randomization. DISCUSSION: The PROUD trial provides information for clinical leaders and policy makers regarding potential benefits for patients and health systems of a collaborative care model for management of OUD in primary care, tested in real-world diverse primary care settings. Trial registration # NCT03407638 (February 28, 2018); CTN-0074 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03407638?term=CTN-0074&draw=2&ra….

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7931
Primary Care Patients with Drug Use Report Chronic Pain and Self-Medicate with Alcohol and Other Drugs
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. P. Alford, J. S. German, J. H. Samet, D. M. Cheng, C. A. Lloyd-Travaglini, R. Saitz
Year: 2016
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is common among patients with drug use disorders. The prevalence of chronic pain and its consequences in primary care patients who use drugs is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To examine: 1) the prevalence of chronic pain and pain-related dysfunction among primary care patients who screen positive for drug use, and 2) the prevalence of substance use to self-medicate chronic pain in this population. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional analysis. PARTICIPANTS: This study included 589 adult patients who screened positive for any illicit drug use or prescription drug misuse, recruited from an urban, hospital-based primary care practice. MAIN MEASURES: Both pain and pain-related dysfunction were assessed by numeric rating scales, and grouped as: (0) none, (1-3) mild, (4-6) moderate, (7-10) severe. Questions were asked about the use of substances to treat pain. KEY RESULTS: Among 589 participants, chronic pain was reported by 87% (95% CI: 84-90%), with 13% mild, 24% moderate and 50% severe. Pain-related dysfunction was reported by 74% (95% CI: 70-78%), with 15% mild, 23% moderate, and 36% severe. Of the 576 that used illicit drugs (i.e., marijuana, cocaine, and/or heroin), 51% reported using to treat pain (95% CI: 47-55% ). Of the 121 with prescription drug misuse, 81% (95% CI: 74-88%) used to treat pain. Of the 265 participants who reported any heavy drinking in the past 3 months, 38% (95% CI: 32-44%) did so to treat pain compared to 79% (95% CI: 68-90%) of the 57 high-risk alcohol users. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain and pain-related dysfunction were the norm for primary care patients who screened positive for drug use, with nearly one-third reporting both severe pain and severe pain-related dysfunction. Many patients using illicit drugs, misusing prescription drugs and using alcohol reported doing so in order to self-medicate their pain. Pain needs to be addressed when patients are counseled about their substance use.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7932
Primary care patients' experiences of video consultations for depression and anxiety: a qualitative interview study embedded in a randomized feasibility trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. W. Haun, L. Oeljeklaus, M. Hoffmann, J. Tonnies, M. Wensing, J. Szecsenyi, F. Peters-Klimm, R. Krisam, D. Kronsteiner, M. Hartmann, H. C. Friederich
Year: 2023
7933
Primary care payment reform: The missing link
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. Tuggy, G. Hoekzema, S. Abercrombie, S. Chacko, J. Gravel, K. Hall, L. Maxwell, M. Mazzone, T. Shaffer, M. Wieschhaus
Year: 2012
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
Reference Links:       
7934
Primary care pediatricians as a solution to increasing treatment of anxiety and depression
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Eric M. Butter
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
7935
Primary care perspectives on generalized anxiety disorder
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. P. Roy-Byrne, A. Wagner
Year: 2004
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Recently, there has been increased interest in the impact and treatment of anxiety disorders. However, one type of anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), has received less attention than other disorders, such as panic disorder, despite the prevalence and amenability of this disorder to treatment in the primary care setting. Rates of GAD have been found to be between 2.8% and 8.5%, with a median prevalence of 5.8%-at least twice the rate reported in the National Comorbidity Survey. Up to one third of patients presenting to primary care clinics with somatic complaints had a mood or anxiety disorder. Generalized anxiety disorder is linked to the overuse of medical services: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, diagnostic and laboratory tests, pharmacy costs, and so on. Recognition of anxiety and depression in primary care is poor, with only 23% of pure anxiety cases being recognized compared with 56% of depression cases. The various stakeholders (patients, family members, employers, and insurers) in a patient's outcome often complicate treatment of anxiety. Barriers to effective treatment include time constraints, acute disease orientation of most care systems, lack of planned follow-up and monitoring, and relative unavailability of specialist access. The collaborative care approach is designed to overcome these barriers. With this approach, the patient is provided with additional educational materials, physicians are supported by physician extenders (nurses, social workers, or expert consultants) who provide case-based feedback, follow-up, extra visits, and telephone calls to patients. Providing efficacious treatment to primary care for GAD will require improving knowledge of providers and increasing patient engagement.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection
7936
Primary care physician ability to identify pediatric mental health issues
Type: Journal Article
Authors: David Cawthorpe
Year: 2005
Publication Place: Canada: Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7937
Primary Care Physician Perceptions on Caring for Complex Patients with Medical and Mental Illness
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. F. Loeb, E. A. Bayliss, I. A. Binswanger, C. Candrian, F. V. DeGruy
Year: 2012
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mental illness is common and associated with poor outcomes for co-occurring medical illness. Since primary care physicians manage the treatment of complex patients with both mental and medical illnesses, their perspectives on the care of these patients is vital to improving clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine physician perceptions of patient, physician and system factors that affect the care of complex patients with mental and medical illness. DESIGN: Inductive, participatory, team-based qualitative analysis of transcripts of in-depth semi-structured interviews. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen internal medicine physicians from two university primary care clinics and three community health clinics. RESULTS: Participant characteristics were balanced in terms of years in practice, practice site, and gender. Physicians identified contributing factors to the complexity of patient care within the domains of patient, physician and system factors. Physicians identified 1) type of mental illness, 2) acuity of mental illness, and 3) communication styles of individual patients as the principal patient characteristics that affected care. Physicians expressed concern regarding their own lack of medical knowledge, clinical experience, and communication skills in treating mental illness. Further, they discussed tensions between professionalism and emotional responses to patients. Participants expressed great frustration with the healthcare system centered on: 1) lack of mental health resources, 2) fragmentation of care, 3) clinic procedures, and 4) the national healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians in this study made a compelling case for increased training in the treatment of mental illness and improvements in the delivery of mental health care. Participants expressed a strong desire for increased integration of care through collaboration between primary care providers and mental health specialists. This approach could improve both comfort in treating mental illness and the delivery of care for complex patients.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7938
Primary care physician referral patterns for behavioral health diagnoses
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Kimberley H. Geissler, John E. Zeber
Year: 2020
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7939
Primary Care Physician Shortages Could Be Eliminated Through Use Of Teams, Nonphysicians, And Electronic Communication
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. V. Green, S. Savin, Y. Lu
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
7940
Primary Care Physicians Missing Early Signs of Serious Mental Illness
Type: Web Resource
Authors: Health Behavior News Service
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.