Email UpdatesLiterature Collection
Collection Insights
11K+
References
9K+
Articles
1400+
Grey Literature
4600+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
11193 Results
6727
Older adults' attitudes toward depression screening in primary care settings and exploring a brief educational pamphlet
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links: 
View the DOI record for Older adults' attitudes toward depression screening in primary care settings and exploring a brief educational pamphlet
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Older adults' attitudes toward depression screening in primary care settings and exploring a brief educational pamphlet6730
Older depressed Latinos' experiences with primary care visits for personal, emotional and/or mental health problems: a qualitative analysis
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2014
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe salient experiences with a primary care visit (eg, the context leading up to the visit, the experience and/or outcomes of that visit) for emotional, personal and/or mental health problems older Latinos with a history of depression and recent depressive symptoms and/or antidepressant medication use reported 10 years after enrollment into a randomized controlled trial of quality-improvement for depression in primary care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of existing qualitative data from the second stage of the continuation study of Partners in Care (PIC). PARTICIPANTS: Latino ethnicity, aged > or =50 years, recent depressive symptoms and/or antidepressant medication use, and a recent primary care visit for mental health problems. Of 280 second-stage participants, 47 were eligible. Both stages of the continuation study included participants from the PIC parent study control and 2 intervention groups, and all had a history of depression. METHODS: Data analyzed by a multidisciplinary team using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: beliefs about the nature of depression; prior experiences with mental health disorders/treatments; sociocultural context (eg, social relationships, caregiving, the media); clinic-related features (eg, accessibility of providers, staff continuity, amount of visit time); and provider attributes (eg, interpersonal skills, holistic care approach). CONCLUSIONS: Findings emphasize the importance of key features for shaping the context leading up to primary care visits for help-seeking for mental health problems, and the experience and/or outcomes of those visits, among older depressed Latinos at long-term follow-up, and may help tailor chronic depression care for the clinical management of this vulnerable population.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
6731
Older people's mental health in rural areas: Converting policy into service development, service access and a sustainable workforce
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2019
Publication Place: Australia
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
6732
On the Occasion of the World Mental Health Day Minding the Gap in Mental Health: The Health Promotion-Primary Care-based Solution
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2012
Publication Place: Iran
Topic(s):
General Literature
See topic collection
6734
On-site mental health workers delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients in primary care: Effects on the professional practice of primary care providers
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2009
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are common in primary care and mental health workers (MHWs) are increasingly working in this setting delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions to patients. In addition to treating patients directly, the introduction of on-site MHWs represents an organisational change that may lead to changes in the clinical behaviour of primary care providers (PCPs). OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of on-site MHWs delivering psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions in primary care on the clinical behaviour of primary care providers (PCPs). SEARCH STRATEGY: The following sources were searched in 1998: the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CounselLit, NPCRDC skill-mix in primary care bibliography, and reference lists of articles. Additional searches were conducted in February 2007 using the following sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials, controlled before and after studies, and interrupted time series analyses of MHWs working alongside PCPs in primary care settings. The outcomes included objective measures of PCP behaviours such as consultation rates, prescribing, and referral. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN RESULTS: Forty-two studies were included in the review. There was evidence that MHWs caused significant reductions in PCP consultations (standardised mean difference -0.17, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.05), psychotropic prescribing (relative risk 0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.79), prescribing costs (standardised mean difference -0.22, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.07), and rates of mental health referral (relative risk 0.13, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.20) for the patients they were seeing. In controlled before and after studies, the addition of MHWs to a practice did not affect prescribing behaviour towards the wider practice population and there was no consistent pattern to the impact on referrals in the wider patient population. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review provides some evidence that MHWs working in primary care to deliver psychological therapy and psychosocial interventions cause a significant reduction in PCP behaviours such as consultations, prescribing, and referrals to specialist care. However, the changes are modest in magnitude, inconsistent, do not generalise to the wider patient population, and their clinical or economic significance is unclear.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
6735
On-site mental health workers in primary care: effects on professional practice
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2000
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Key & Foundational
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for On-site mental health workers in primary care: effects on professional practice
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for On-site mental health workers in primary care: effects on professional practice6736
Once-monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine (Sublocade) for opioid use disorder
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
Reference Links: View the PubMed citation for Once-monthly subcutaneous buprenorphine (Sublocade) for opioid use disorder
6738
One size fits some: The impact of patient treatment attitudes on the cost-effectiveness of a depression primary-care intervention
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2005
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite their impact on outcomes, the effect of patient treatment attitudes on the cost-effectiveness of health-care interventions is not widely studied. This study estimated the impact of patient receptivity to antidepressant medication on the cost-effectiveness of an evidence-based primary-care depression intervention. METHOD: Twelve community primary-care practices were stratified and then randomized to enhanced (intervention) or usual care. Subjects included 211 patients beginning a new treatment episode for major depression. At baseline, 111 (52.6%) and 145 (68.7%) reported receptivity to antidepressant medication and counseling respectively. The intervention trained the primary-care teams to assess, educate, and monitor depressed patients. Twelve-month incremental (enhanced minus usual care) total costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated. RESULTS: Among patients receptive to antidepressants, the mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was dollar 5,864 per QALY (sensitivity analyses up to dollar 14,689 per QALY). For patients not receptive to antidepressants, the mean incremental QALY score was negative (for both main and sensitivity analyses), or the intervention was at least no more effective than usual care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a re-thinking of the 'one size fits all' depression intervention, given that half of depressed primary-care patients may be non-receptive to antidepressant medication treatment. A brief assessment of treatment receptivity should occur early in the treatment process to identify patients most likely to benefit from primary-care quality improvement efforts for depression treatment. Patient treatment preferences are also important for the development, design, and analysis of depression interventions.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability
See topic collection
6739
One-Visit Behavioral Intervention for Older Primary Care Patients with Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2016
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: We pilot tested a one-visit behavioral intervention with telephone follow-up for older primary care patients with mild to moderate depressive symptoms. METHODS: A total of 16 English-speaking primary care patients aged 60 years and older who scored 5 to 14 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) engaged in the intervention visit. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 4 weeks: activity goals, readiness to change (University of Rhode Island Change Assessment), PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, and satisfaction. RESULTS: The 14 participants who completed the study met or exceeded 73% of activity goals on average. They also improved on all outcomes (P < 0.05) with medium (University of Rhode Island Change Assessment, GAD-7) to large effect sizes (PHQ-9, World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0), and they were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provided preliminary evidence that a one-visit behavioral activation intervention is acceptable and feasible and improves outcomes. If findings are confirmed, then this intervention could be integrated into existing collaborative care programs.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for One-Visit Behavioral Intervention for Older Primary Care Patients with Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for One-Visit Behavioral Intervention for Older Primary Care Patients with Mild to Moderate Depressive Symptoms6740
One-year follow-up of collaborative depression care for low-income, predominantly Hispanic patients with cancer
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study assessed longer-term outcomes of low-income patients with cancer (predominantly female and Hispanic) after treatment in a collaborative model of depression care or in enhanced usual care. METHODS: The randomized controlled trial, conducted in safety-net oncology clinics, recruited 472 patients with major depression symptoms. Patients randomly assigned to a 12-month intervention (a depression care manager and psychiatrist provided problem-solving therapy, antidepressants, and symptom monitoring and relapse prevention) or enhanced usual care (control group) were interviewed at 18 and 24 months after enrollment. RESULTS: At 24 months, 46% of patients in the intervention group and 32% in the control group had a >/=50% decrease in depression score over baseline (odds ratio=2.09, 95% confidence interval=1.13-3.86; p=.02); intervention patients had significantly better social (p=.03) and functional (p=.01) well-being. Treatment receipt among intervention patients declined (72%, 21%, and 18% at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively); few control group patients reported treatment receipt (10%, 6%, and 13%, respectively). Significant differences in receipt of counseling or antidepressants disappeared at 24 months. Depression recurrence was similar between groups (intervention, 36%; control, 39%). Among patients with depression recurrence, intervention patients were more likely to receive treatment after 12 months (34% versus 10%; p=.03). At 24 months, attrition (262 patients, 56%) did not vary by group; 22% were deceased, 20% declined further participation, and 14% could not be located. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care reduced depression symptoms and enhanced quality of life; however, results call for ongoing depression symptom monitoring and treatment for low-income cancer survivors.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for One-year follow-up of collaborative depression care for low-income, predominantly Hispanic patients with cancer
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for One-year follow-up of collaborative depression care for low-income, predominantly Hispanic patients with cancer