Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
10858 Results
1901
Chapter 3-- Motivational Interviewing as a Counseling Style. Enhancing Motivation for Change in Substance Abuse Treatment
Type: Government Report
Authors: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Year: 1999
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

1903
Characteristics and correlates of U.S. clinicians prescribing buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment using expanded authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. M. Jones, M. M. Diallo, M. Vythilingam, J. G. Schier, M. Eisenstat, W. M. Compton
Year: 2021
Publication Place: Ireland
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: To determine how clinicians with a DATA waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic to emergency authorities, including use of telehealth to prescribe buprenorphine, the challenges faced by clinicians, and strategies employed by them to manage patients with OUD. METHODS: From June 23, 2020 to August 19, 2020, we conducted an electronic survey of U.S. DATA-waivered clinicians. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression were used for analysis. RESULTS: Among 10,238 respondents, 68 % were physicians, 25 % nursing-related providers, and 6% physician assistants; 28 % reported never prescribing or not prescribing in the 12 months prior to the survey. Among the 72 % of clinicians who reported past 12-month buprenorphine prescribing (i.e. active practitioners during the pandemic) 30 % reported their practice setting closed to in-person visits during COVID-19; 33 % reported remote prescribing to new patients without an in-person examination. The strongest predictors of remote buprenorphine prescribing to new patients were prescribing buprenorphine to larger numbers of patients in an average month in the past year and closure of the practice setting during the pandemic; previous experience with remote prescribing to established patients prior to COVID-19 also was a significant predictor. Among clinicians prescribing to new patients without an in-person examination, 5.5 % reported difficulties with buprenorphine induction, most commonly withdrawal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth practices and prescribing to new patients without an in-person examination were adopted by DATA-waivered clinicians during the first six months of COVID-19. Permanent adoption of these authorities may enable expanded access to buprenorphine treatment.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1904
Characteristics and Disparities among Primary Care Practices in the United States
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. M. Levine, J. A. Linder, B. E. Landon
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite new incentives for US primary care, concerns abound that patient-centered practice capabilities are lagging. OBJECTIVE: Describe the practice structure, patient-centered capabilities, and payment relationships of US primary care practices; identify disparities in practice capabilities. DESIGN: Analysis of the 2015 Medical Organizations Survey (MOS), part of the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). SETTING: Practice-reported information from primary care practices of MEPS respondents who reported receiving primary care and made at least one visit in 2015 to that practice. PARTICIPANTS: Surveyed primary care practices (n = 4318; 77% response rate) providing primary care to 7161 individuals, representing 101,159,263 Americans. MAIN MEASURES: Practice structure (ownership and personnel); practice capabilities (certification as a patient-centered medical home [PCMH], electronic health record [EHR] use, and x-ray capability); and payment orientation (accountable care organization [ACO] and capitation). KEY RESULTS: Independently owned practices served 55% of patients, hospital-owned practices served 19%, and nonprofit/government/academic-owned served 20%. Solo practices served 25% of patients and practices with 2-10 physicians served 53% of patients. Forty-one percent of patients were served by practices certified as PCMHs. Practices with EHRs cared for 90% of patients and could exchange secure messages with 78% of patients. Practices with in-office x-ray capability cared for 34% of patients. Practices participating in ACOs and capitation served 44% and 46% of patients, respectively. Primary care patients in the South, compared to the rest of the country, had less access to nearly all practice capabilities, including patient care coordination (adjusted difference, 13% [95% CI, 8-18]) and secure EHR messaging (adjusted difference, 6% [95% CI, 1-10]). Uninsured patients were less likely to be served at a practice that used an EHR (adjusted difference, 9% [95% CI, 2-16]). CONCLUSIONS: Participants' primary care practices were mostly independently owned, nearly always used EHRs (albeit of varying capability), and frequently participated in innovative payment arrangements for a portion of their patients. Patient practices in the South had fewer capabilities than the rest of the country.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
1905
Characteristics and Disparities among Primary Care Practices in the United States
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. M. Levine, J. A. Linder, B. E. Landon
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite new incentives for US primary care, concerns abound that patient-centered practice capabilities are lagging. OBJECTIVE: Describe the practice structure, patient-centered capabilities, and payment relationships of US primary care practices; identify disparities in practice capabilities. DESIGN: Analysis of the 2015 Medical Organizations Survey (MOS), part of the nationally representative Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). SETTING: Practice-reported information from primary care practices of MEPS respondents who reported receiving primary care and made at least one visit in 2015 to that practice. PARTICIPANTS: Surveyed primary care practices (n = 4318; 77% response rate) providing primary care to 7161 individuals, representing 101,159,263 Americans. MAIN MEASURES: Practice structure (ownership and personnel); practice capabilities (certification as a patient-centered medical home [PCMH], electronic health record [EHR] use, and x-ray capability); and payment orientation (accountable care organization [ACO] and capitation). KEY RESULTS: Independently owned practices served 55% of patients, hospital-owned practices served 19%, and nonprofit/government/academic-owned served 20%. Solo practices served 25% of patients and practices with 2-10 physicians served 53% of patients. Forty-one percent of patients were served by practices certified as PCMHs. Practices with EHRs cared for 90% of patients and could exchange secure messages with 78% of patients. Practices with in-office x-ray capability cared for 34% of patients. Practices participating in ACOs and capitation served 44% and 46% of patients, respectively. Primary care patients in the South, compared to the rest of the country, had less access to nearly all practice capabilities, including patient care coordination (adjusted difference, 13% [95% CI, 8-18]) and secure EHR messaging (adjusted difference, 6% [95% CI, 1-10]). Uninsured patients were less likely to be served at a practice that used an EHR (adjusted difference, 9% [95% CI, 2-16]). CONCLUSIONS: Participants' primary care practices were mostly independently owned, nearly always used EHRs (albeit of varying capability), and frequently participated in innovative payment arrangements for a portion of their patients. Patient practices in the South had fewer capabilities than the rest of the country.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Medical Home See topic collection
1906
Characteristics and experiences of buprenorphine-naloxone use among polysubstance users
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. Walker, T. K. Logan, Q. T. Chipley, J. Miller
Year: 2018
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: With a rise in overdoses and medical emergencies related to opioids, buprenorphine-naloxone (bup-nx) is seen as a preferred treatment for opioid dependence. However, the research examining experiences with bup-nx among polysubstance users who may or may not be opioid dependent has been limited. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to examine use, characteristics of users, and experiences of bup-nx use among polysubstance users entering drug-free recovery programs. METHODS: This study examined secondary data on 896 opioid or opiate user individuals (53.4% male) collected by drug-free, self-help-based residential recovery centers during intake. RESULTS: One-quarter of users said bup-nx helped them with their substance use while 75% of bup-nx users reported that bup-nx either had no effect or a negative effect on their drug problems. Of the very few (4%-7%) obtaining bup-nx solely through a prescription, over 90% reported relief from withdrawal. However, over 80% of those who obtained bup-nx through illicit means reported using bup-nx until their preferred drug could be obtained and used it for its euphoriant effect. Three groups of opioid users were created including one group with no bup-nx use, one with lifetime but not recent bup-nx use, and one with recent (past 6 month) use. There were differences in substance use patterns and characteristics of bup-nx experiences between the different groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the views of bup-nx by individuals in drug-free recovery centers are varied, with many seeing bup-nx as not unlike other opioids while others report bup-nx as self-medication.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
1907
Characteristics and health care events of patients admitted to treatment for both heroin and methamphetamine compared to patients admitted for heroin only
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Sanae El Ibrahimi, Sara Hallvik, Kirbee Johnston, Gillian Leichtling, P. T. Korthuis, Brian Chan, Daniel M. Hartung
Year: 2021
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1909
Characteristics and Outcome of Male and Female Methadone Maintenance Patients: MMT in Tel Aviv and Las Vegas
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Miriam Adelson, Shirley Linzy, Einat Peles
Year: 2018
Publication Place: Philadelphia
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1910
Characteristics and prescribing practices of clinicians recently waivered to prescribe buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Christopher M. Jones, Elinore F. McCance-Katz
Year: 2018
Publication Place: England
Abstract:

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Expanding access to medication-assisted treatment with buprenorphine is a cornerstone of the opioid crisis response, yet buprenorphine remains underutilized. Research has identified multiple barriers to prescribing buprenorphine. This study aimed to examine clinician characteristics, prescribing practices and barriers and incentives to prescribing buprenorphine among clinicians with a federal Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA) waiver to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment. DESIGN: Electronic survey of 4225 clinicians conducted between March and April 2018. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians obtaining an initial federal DATA waiver or an increase in authorized patient limit to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment in 2017. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression examined clinician characteristics, prescribing practices and primary barriers and incentives to prescribing buprenorphine or prescribing at or near the authorized patient limit. FINDINGS: Among respondents, 75.5% had prescribed buprenorphine since obtaining a DATA waiver; the mean (standard deviation) number of patients treated in the past month was 26.6 (40.3), and 13.1% of providers were prescribing at or near their patient limit in the past month. Lack of patient demand, cited by 19.4% of clinicians, was the most common primary barrier to prescribing buprenorphine or prescribing to the authorized patient limit, followed by time constraints in practice (14.6%) and insurance reimbursement, prior authorization or other insurance requirements (13.2%). Increased patient demand (22.2%), institutional support for buprenorphine treatment (12.5%) and increased reimbursement (12.2%) were the most endorsed primary incentives for buprenorphine prescribing. Multivariable logistic regression models identified multiple clinician characteristics associated with buprenorphine prescribing and prescribing at or near the authorized patient limit. CONCLUSIONS: US clinicians recently waivered to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder treatment appear to prescribe well below their patient limit, and many do not prescribe at all.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1911
Characteristics and response to treatment among Indigenous people receiving injectable diacetylmorphine or hydromorphone in a randomised controlled trial for the treatment of long-term opioid dependence
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. Oviedo-Joekes, H. Palis, D. Guh, K. Marchand, S. Brissette, K. Lock, S. MacDonald, S. Harrison, A. H. Anis, M. Krausz, D. C. Marsh, M. T. Schechter
Year: 2018
Publication Place: Australia
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
1912
Characteristics and response to treatment among Indigenous people receiving injectable diacetylmorphine or hydromorphone in a randomised controlled trial for the treatment of long‐term opioid dependence
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Eugenia Oviedo‐Joekes, Heather Palis, Daphne Guh, Kirsten Marchand, Suzanne Brissette, Kurt Lock, Scott MacDonald, Scott Harrison, Aslam H. Anis, Michael Krausz, David C. Marsh, Martin T. Schechter
Year: 2018
Publication Place: Surry Hills
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1914
Characteristics of Alcohol, Marijuana, and Other Drug Use Among Persons Aged 13–18 Years Being Assessed for Substance Use Disorder Treatment — United States, 2014–2022
Type: Web Resource
Authors: Sarah Connolly, Taryn Dailey Govoni, Xinyi Jiang, Andrew Terranella, Gery P. Guy Jr., Jody L. Green
Year: 2024
Publication Place: Washington, DC
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

1916
Characteristics of chronic noncancer pain patients assessed with the opioid risk tool in a Canadian tertiary care pain clinic
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. F. Lakha, A. F. Louffat, K. Nicholson, A. Deshpande, A. Mailis-Gagnon
Year: 2014
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) is a screening instrument for assessing the risk of opioid-related aberrant behavior in chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare patient characteristics documented in the original ORT study with those identified in CNCP patients assessed using a physician-administered ORT in a tertiary care pain clinic in Toronto, Canada. METHODOLOGY: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study of 322 consecutive new patients referred over 12 months. Data extraction included ORT scores, demographics, pain ratings, opioid, and other medication use at point of entry, diagnosis, and other variables. Characteristics were compared with those described in the original ORT study. RESULTS: The total mean ORT scores of patients in this study were related to several demographic (gender, age, marital status, and country of birth) and nondemographic variables (employment status, cigarette smoking, and contribution of biomedical and/or psychological factors to presentation). Prevalence of characteristics noted in this patient sample differed substantially from that found in Webster and Webster as the basis for ORT scores. CONCLUSION: Significant differences existed between this study population and the patient sample from which the ORT was derived. Limitations of this study are discussed. We concur with the authors of the original study that the ORT may not be applicable in different pain populations and settings. Based on our findings, we encourage caution in interpreting the ORT in general CNCP settings until further studies are performed.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
1917
Characteristics of collaborative care in increasing access to mental health service in the Asian community.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Jeehee Sung, Nicolle Mayo, Mei-Ju Ko, Chandra Lasley
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
1918
Characteristics of effective collaborative care for treatment of depression: a systematic review and meta-regression of 74 randomised controlled trials
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. A. Coventry, J. L. Hudson, E. Kontopantelis, J. Archer, D. A. Richards, S. Gilbody, K. Lovell, C. Dickens, L. Gask, W. Waheed, P. Bower
Year: 2014
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Collaborative care is a complex intervention based on chronic disease management models and is effective in the management of depression. However, there is still uncertainty about which components of collaborative care are effective. We used meta-regression to identify factors in collaborative care associated with improvement in patient outcomes (depressive symptoms) and the process of care (use of anti-depressant medication). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Systematic review with meta-regression. The Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group trials registers were searched from inception to 9th February 2012. An update was run in the CENTRAL trials database on 29th December 2013. Inclusion criteria were: randomised controlled trials of collaborative care for adults >/=18 years with a primary diagnosis of depression or mixed anxiety and depressive disorder. Random effects meta-regression was used to estimate regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between study level covariates and depressive symptoms and relative risk (95% CI) and anti-depressant use. The association between anti-depressant use and improvement in depression was also explored. Seventy four trials were identified (85 comparisons, across 21,345 participants). Collaborative care that included psychological interventions predicted improvement in depression (beta coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.01, p = 0.03). Systematic identification of patients (relative risk 1.43, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.81, p = 0.004) and the presence of a chronic physical condition (relative risk 1.32, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.65, p = 0.02) predicted use of anti-depressant medication. CONCLUSION: Trials of collaborative care that included psychological treatment, with or without anti-depressant medication, appeared to improve depression more than those without psychological treatment. Trials that used systematic methods to identify patients with depression and also trials that included patients with a chronic physical condition reported improved use of anti-depressant medication. However, these findings are limited by the observational nature of meta-regression, incomplete data reporting, and the use of study aggregates.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
1919
Characteristics of Family Physicians Practicing Collaboratively With Behavioral Health Professionals
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. T. Tong, Z. J. Morgan, K. A. Stephens, A. Bazemore, L. E. Peterson
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
1920
Characteristics of Individuals in the United States Who Used Opioids During Pregnancy
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. H. N. Nguyen, E. A. Knapp, X. Li, C. A. Camargo, E. Conradt, W. Cowell, K. J. Derefinko, A. J. Elliott, A. M. Friedman, G. K. Khurana Hershey, J. A. Hofheimer, B. M. Lester, C. T. McEvoy, J. M. Neiderhiser, E. Oken, S. J. Ondersma, S. Sathyanarayana, M. E. Stabler, A. Stroustrup, I. Tung, M. McGrath
Year: 2023
Abstract:

Background: Opioid use has disproportionally impacted pregnant people and their fetuses. Previous studies describing opioid use among pregnant people are limited by geographic location, type of medical coverage, and small sample size. We described characteristics of a large, diverse group of pregnant people who were enrolled in the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Program, and determined which characteristics were associated with opioid use during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional data obtained from 21,905 pregnancies of individuals across the United States enrolled in the ECHO between 1990 and 2021 were analyzed. Medical records, laboratory testing, and self-report were used to determine opioid-exposed pregnancies. Multiple imputation methods using fully conditional specification with a discriminant function accounted for missing characteristics data. Results: Opioid use was present in 2.8% (n = 591) of pregnancies. The majority of people who used opioids in pregnancy were non-Hispanic White (67%) and had at least some college education (69%). Those who used opioids reported high rates of alcohol use (32%) and tobacco use (39%) during the pregnancy; although data were incomplete, only 5% reported heroin use and 86% of opioid use originated from a prescription. After adjustment, non-Hispanic White race, pregnancy during the years 2010-2012, higher parity, tobacco use, and use of illegal drugs during pregnancy were each significantly associated with opioid use during pregnancy. In addition, maternal depression was associated with increased odds of opioid use during pregnancy by more than two-fold (adjusted odds ratio 2.42, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-3.01). Conclusions: In this large study of pregnancies from across the United States, we found several factors that were associated with opioid use among pregnant people. Further studies examining screening for depression and polysubstance use may be useful for targeted interventions to prevent detrimental opioid use during pregnancy, while further elucidation of the reasons for use of prescription opioids during pregnancy should be further explored.

Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection