Literature Collection

Objectives: To demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of a brief mindfulness-based intervention taught by physicians for patients with opioid addiction and to determine if the intervention reduces likelihood of relapse or treatment failure within 6 months. Design: A prospective, feasibility, single-group, cohort pilot study. Setting: A Family Medicine teaching clinic serving a mixed urban and rural population in Bangor, Maine. Subjects: Adult patients initiating outpatient treatment for opioid addiction with buprenorphine (N = 40). Interventions: Study physicians conducted a 10- to 12-min education session for all patients starting treatment during the enrollment period, including a 5-min mindfulness exercise. Enrolled subjects received an MP3 player loaded with six mindfulness audio exercises (5-19 min) and were instructed to practice at least 5 min daily and record their practice in a logbook. Outcome measures: Acceptability and subjective usefulness to recovery were evaluated at 2, 4, and 6 months of follow-up, with qualitative analysis of themes in recorded poststudy interviews. Logbook entries and tablet-based surveys provided data on home mindfulness practice, classified as "high" or "low." Relapse or treatment failure was documented. Results: Feasibility and acceptability were demonstrated with 82% enrollment and 100%, 97%, and 90% completion of follow-up visits at 2, 4, and 6 months, respectively, among those still in treatment. Sustained positive impressions of the intervention and exercises remained at 6 months. Relapse or treatment failure was reduced in the "high" practice uptake group compared with "low" practice uptake (11% vs. 42%, p = 0.033). Conclusions: In contrast to more intensive 8-week models of meditation training, this study demonstrates that even a brief single training session can induce sustained home meditation practice that subjectively helped patients in recovery for opioid addiction and was associated with lower risk of relapse. Brief mindfulness-based interventions may be useful to increase access to mindfulness training in this population.

BACKGROUND: Addressing the complex health and wellbeing challenges of older adults is a critical public health priority as populations age. Social Prescribing (SP) represents a promising strategy, connecting patients to non-clinical, community-based resources to enhance physical, mental, and social wellbeing. METHODS: To develop a SP theory of change, this study used cross-sectional data from 2,450 community-dwelling older adults who participated in a population survey. Factor analyses identified four factors of comfort with primary care discussions (general, mental, physical, and social wellness) and three factors of openness to SP (effectiveness, meaningfulness, and supportiveness). Path analysis was conducted for each set of mediators separately. RESULTS: Path analyses revealed that comfort with primary care discussions about social wellness (β = 0.08**) is associated with better wellbeing. People who report social loneliness are most comfortable with primary care discussions about general wellness (β = - 0.17***) and least comfortable with primary care discussions about mental wellness (β = - 0.24***), whereas people who report emotional loneliness are more likely to have similar levels of comfort to discuss general wellness and mental wellness (β = - 0.18***; - 0.18***). In addition, social loneliness is associated with less comfort with primary care discussions about social wellness (β = - 0.19***) and mental wellness (β = - 0.19***), whereas association is not found for emotional loneliness. These suggest that addressing the SP needs of people who experience emotional loneliness requires a different strategy. Reporting emotional loneliness is associated with expressing support for SP (β = 0.14***), which may be key to improving wellbeing (β = 0.10***) among this population. Overall, social loneliness has a total effect size of β(total) = - 0.19, whereas emotional loneliness has a total effect size of β(total) = - 0.45, more than 2.3 times larger. CONCLUSIONS: While SP may be acceptable to those who need it, some may experience greater difficulties accessing SP through primary care providers without interventions tailored to their loneliness status that could elicit buy-in and enrolment. Primary care providers may wish to pay closer attention to people with emotional loneliness. Other considerations, such as trust and motivational interviewing for positive self-beliefs may explain potential changes from loneliness to wellbeing.