Literature Collection

OBJECTIVES: To explore how primary care providers report discussing substance use with transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adult patients within the context of discussing gender-affirming interventions. METHODS: Between March and April 2022, in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 primary care providers who care for TGD patients in the Northeastern US. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data and identify themes. RESULTS: Two primary themes emerged among providers: 1) placing a focus on harm reduction, emphasizing reducing negative consequences of substance use, and 2) using access to gender-affirming interventions as an incentive for patients to change their substance use patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Focusing on harm reduction can emphasize reducing potential adverse outcomes while working with TGD patients towards their gender-affirmation goals. Future research should explore varying approaches to how substance use is discussed with TGD patients, as well as the interpretation of gender-affirming clinical guidelines. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study indicate a need for enhancing provider knowledge around the appropriate application of gender-affirming care guidelines. Investing in training efforts to improve gender-affirming care is critical for encouraging approaches that prioritize harm reduction and do not unnecessarily prevent access to gender-affirming interventions.

In this first of three papers, we seek to understand how the new "integrated care" global policy directive, pursuing greater alignment for health and social care systems, will be translated into preparation for practice concerning interprofessional education (IPE) from pre-to-post registration level and for continuing professional development. We ask questions about the implications for leaders and practitioners in the field of IPE and collaborative practice (CP). In seeking to understand this new global policy directive, we explore the plethora of definitions, concepts and perspectives, continuously evolving and at times counterproductive as they try to synthesize complexity, to describe how health and social care systems and practitioners work together. We trace research on how integrated care is understood drawing upon transnational current understandings of integrated working in North America, Europe and the UK. We ask questions of the ambitions of integrated care aligned to forging closer working relationships between health and social care practitioners to tackle modern complex healthcare challenges. In reading the literature we have sought to identify the themes which emerge to direct the field of IPE and CP so that the workforce is prepared to deliver care, as policy makers intended, within locally designed new innovative care systems. We conclude that it remains unclear as to whether these new policy aspirations will achieve the connectivity required, for a supported workforce, committed to working together to deliver care envisaged to help people experiencing complex long-term conditions, disadvantage and health inequalities. In our second paper, we review the developmental pathway for IPE, taking a closer look at preparation for integrated care pathways and collaborative practice, seeking evidence to guide us. Finally, in our third paper, we turn our attention to the implications for the workforce composition, dynamics, and relationships, exploring heightened progressive ever-changing roles and responsibilities, focusing on social work.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a debilitating illness that remains a serious public health issue in the United States. Use of telemedicine to deliver medications for the treatment of OUD (MOUD) was limited until the confluence of the COVID-19 and opioid addiction epidemics in spring 2020. Starting in spring 2020, the Department of Veterans Health Affairs (VHA) transitioned from in-person to mostly telemedicine-delivered OUD care to reduce COVID-19 transmission among veterans and providers. To gain a nuanced understanding of provider perspectives on MOUD care delivery using telemedicine, we conducted semi-structured interviews with VHA providers who were using telehealth to deliver MOUD care. METHODS: We conducted semi-structed Zoom interviews with VA clinicians at nine VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) in eight states. Potential study participants were identified as providers who were involved in referrals and provision of buprenorphine treatment for chronic pain and opioid addiction. Audio-recordings of all interviews were transcribed and entered into Atlas. Ti qualitative analysis software. The study team analyzed the transcripts for major themes related to tele-prescribing practices for buprenorphine. RESULTS: Twenty-three VA providers participated in the study, representing 32% of all providers invited to participate in the study. The research team identified the following four themes: (1) COVID-19 spurred a seismic shift in OUD treatment; (2) Video calls provided a rare window into veterans' lives; (3) Providers experienced numerous challenges to virtual visits; and (4) Providers wrestled with paternalism and trust. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic accelerated the movement toward harm reduction approaches. Prior to the pandemic, stringent requirements existed for patients receiving MOUD care. Providers in this study reflected on the need for these requirements (e.g., in-person visits, toxicology screens) and how reducing this monitoring implied more trust in patients' autonomous decisions. Providers' observation that videoconferencing offered them a window into patients' lives may offer some ways to improve rapport, and research should explore how best to incorporate the additional information conveyed in virtual visits.

The need for mental health care for pediatric patients outstrips the supply, especially in states, like Kansas, that experience shortages of mental health professionals. Pediatric mental health care access programs, like KSKidsMAP (Kansas Kids Mental health Access Program), increase access to care by building competence and confidence in primary care physicians and clinicians (PCPs) through a statewide integrated system that includes a consultation line. This study is a secondary analysis of KSKidsMAP consultation Line inquiries regarding patients aged 0 to 21 years with mental and behavioral health concerns. The study employs a mixed-method approach with descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of inquiries. Five themes were identified: (1) pharmacotherapy, (2) diagnostic evaluation, (3) community resources, (4) psychotherapy, and (5) other. This study sheds light on PCPs needs and illustrates the importance of Pediatric Mental Health Care Access programs offering interprofessional expertise to consulting PCPs, allowing for expansion of pediatric mental illness care into the primary care setting.

AIM: This research aimed to explore the perspectives of primary and community care providers on the challenges that hinder the delivery and uptake of personalized type 2 diabetes (T2D) care, with a focus on the integration of mental health support and care. BACKGROUND: The day-to-day burden and demand of self-managing T2D can negatively impact quality of life and take a toll on mental health and psychological well-being. As a result, there is a need for personalized T2D self-management education and support that integrates mental health care. Despite the need for this personalized care, existing systems remain siloed, hindering access and uptake. In response, innovative, comprehensive, and collaborative models of care have been developed to address fragmentations in care. As individuals living with T2D often receive their care in primary care settings, linking mental health care to existing teams and networks in primary care settings is required. However, there is a need to understand how best to support access, adoption, and engagement with these models in these unique contexts. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to primary and community providers of an Ontario-based smoking cessation network. Survey data were analyzed descriptively with free text responses thematically reported. FINDINGS: Survey respondents (n = 85) represented a broad mix of health professions across primary and community care settings. Addressing challenges to the delivery and uptake of personalized T2D care requires comprehensive strategies to address patient-, practice-, and system-level challenges. Findings from this survey identify the need to tailor these models of care to individual needs, clearly addressing mental health needs, and building strong partnership as means of enhancing accessibility and sustainability of integrated care delivery in primary care settings.

Culture, tradition, structural violence, and mental health-related stigma play a major role in global mental health for refugees. Our aim was to understand what factors determine the success or failure of community-based psychotherapy for trauma-affected refugees and discuss implications for primary health care programs. Using a systematic realist-informed approach, we searched five databases from 2000 to 2018. Two reviewers independently selected RCTs for inclusion, and we contacted authors to obtain therapy training manuals. Fifteen articles and 11 training manuals met our inclusion criteria. Factors that improved symptoms of depression, anxiety, and PTSD included providing culturally adapted care in a migrant-sensitive setting, giving a role to other clinical staff (task-shifting), and intervention intensity. Precarious asylum status, constraining program monitoring requirements, and diverse socio-cultural and gender needs within a setting may reduce the effectiveness of the program. Primary care programs may enable community based mental health care and may reduce mental health-related stigma for refugees and other migrants. More research is needed on the cultural constructs of distress, programs delivered in primary care, and the role of cultural and language interpretation services in mental health care.