Literature Collection

OBJECTIVE: Responding to the nationwide opioid overdose epidemic, Washington State University initiated a naloxone safety net project intending to increase awareness of opioid overdose, increase the availability of naloxone, and examine university students' perceptions regarding the usefulness of a novel, large-group audience-training model. SETTING: A Washington State University campus. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: In September 2014, university students were recruited to attended a large-group audience training event which included opioid overdose prevention, recognition, and first response. All trained participants received an intranasal naloxone reversal kit. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Student pharmacists, who previously received naloxone rescue training and overdose education from the pharmacist lead researcher, acted as trainers. The training consisted of a large-group audience delivery with small-group practice sessions facilitated by the student pharmacists. EVALUATION: Participants who attended the recruitment event completed a pre-training survey to assess knowledge and perceptions about opioid use disorder and overdose. The following week, participants attended the training event. Participants were asked to complete a post-training survey to evaluate the usefulness of the program. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the participants (65/150) who attended the recruitment event reported knowing someone who used prescription opioids to get "high." Seventy-four participants attended the training, and 92% of them (68/74) completed the post-training survey. The majority of respondents agreed that the training program met their expectations and the skills they learned could be used to intervene in an overdose situation. CONCLUSIONS: Before training, survey responses from recruited participates indicated the need to discuss opioid use disorder among university students is important. Use of a training model involving large-group audiences followed by small-group practice sessions offers an acceptable educational solution regarding opioid overdose and prevention. Our experience suggests using this training model to educate university students to recognize and provide first response is a feasible and acceptable approach.

BACKGROUND: Lesbian, bisexual+ and queer (LBQ+) cisgender women have considerable unmet mental health needs. The aims of this study were to examine LBQ+ cisgender women's prior engagement with general practitioners (GPs), and how this relationship shaped their mental health service use. METHOD: Data from 2707 cisgender LBQ+ women were drawn from a national survey of adults who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, queer or questioning, asexual and other diverse sexuality and gender identities (LGBTIQA+) in Australia. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined demographic predictors of continuity of care with GPs and GPs' awareness of LBQ+ women's sexual orientation. The relationship between these variables and recent mental health service use was then analysed, comparing LBQ+ women's engagement with services known to be LGBTIQA+ inclusive and those without an inclusive reputation. RESULTS: LBQ+ cisgender women with a regular GP had greater odds of having accessed mental health services in the last 12months. Two-thirds had a regular GP, with the lowest odds among women aged 18-35years and highest odds among women with a disability. LBQ+ women who did not believe their regular GP knew of their sexuality had lower odds of having accessed LGBTIQA+ inclusive mental health services. These individuals were typically aged below 25years, bisexual+ or queer identified, had below undergraduate-level education, earned <$2000 AUD per week, or lived in an outer-suburban or regional area. CONCLUSION: GPs may be missing opportunities to promote continuity of care through developing trusting relationships with specific sub-populations of LBQ+ women, which in turn appears to sustain inequitable access to mental health care. To offer appropriate care and referrals for this population, GPs should provide safe and inclusive environments to enable comfortable and supportive discussions about sexual orientation when this is relevant to a person's health care.