Literature Collection

HealthySteps is an evidence-based, prevention program for families of children ages 0 to 3 integrated into pediatric primary care. Our objective was to synthesize feedback on local implementation of an enhanced HealthySteps+ program from various stakeholder viewpoints to improve implementation. Qualitative data were gathered from HealthySteps+ team members (n = 14), current clinic staff (n = 15), and a focus group of parents serving on the program's advisory committee (n = 7). Responses indicate that the core features of the HealthySteps+ program are consultations about typical and atypical child development, facilitated connections to resources, and parent mental health support. Key challenges to implementing the program include retention of skilled staff to sustain trusting relationships with parents and other providers. Based on these findings, the HealthySteps+ implementation team has increased communication with clinic staff at daily huddles, developed orientation materials for new pediatricians, and offered families additional peer support opportunities.

Background: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) for buprenorphine prescribing are clinical encounters in which multiple patients with opioid problems receive treatment from providers in a group setting. Telehealth, the provision of clinical services remotely using telecommunications technology, is an essential modality for improving access to healthcare when combined with SMAs, especially since the COVID pandemic. Objectives: The current study specifically examined psychological components of telehealth SMAs for buprenorphine prescribing to learn about the benefits and drawbacks of this treatment model. Methods: Data was collected through qualitative interviews with patients (N=10) in a psychiatry addiction medicine clinic. Narrative synthesis using grounded theory was conducted to identify salient themes from the interviews. Results: Findings highlighted the advantages and downsides of telehealth SMA to treat addictive disorders in a digital age: (1) Shared group identity; (2) Decreased stigma around buprenorphine; (3) Benefits of telehealth; (4) Discomfort with group SMA format; (5) Strategies for managing medication side effects; and (6) Enhanced empathy for providers. Several themes corresponded to therapeutic factors identified in group therapy (i.e., installation of hope, universality, imparting information, altruism) and mechanisms theorized in previous SMA research (e.g., combating isolation, disease self-management, feeling inspired by others). Conclusion: Telehealth SMAs for buprenorphine prescribing may be a unique opportunity for patients to receive both ongoing medication management and psychosocial benefits that promote recovery and reduce stigma. The SMA group had shortcomings for some patients, including privacy concerns, fear of judgment from other patients and limited time to discuss individual concerns with providers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: General practice is the most common source of healthcare for people who use methamphetamine. The aim of this study was to explore primary care providers' understandings of access to and service utilisation by this group. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with general practitioners, practice nurses and alcohol and other drug service providers from two large towns in rural Victoria. RESULTS: Participants (n = 8) reported that availability (workforce shortages, time, complex clinician-client relationships), acceptability (stigma) and appropriateness of care (skill mix, referral networks, models of care) were associated with access to care for this population. Affordability of care was not perceived to be of concern. DISCUSSION: Availability of care is not enough to ensure utilisation and improved health outcomes among consumers who use methamphetamine. Provision of services to this group and to other substance-using populations requires the right 'skill mix' across and within healthcare organisations.

This paper highlights the need for nursing-sensitive indicators tailored to children and young people with complex and integrated care needs. While nursing plays a pivotal role in influencing care quality for this population, current measures predominantly focus on adult populations, creating gaps that hinder the evaluation of nursing contributions across diverse settings such as acute, community, and home care. We examine the importance of quality care measurement for children and young people with complex and integrated care needs and highlight deficiencies in international measurement systems. The discussion highlights the multidimensional care needs of this vulnerable population and advocates for nursing-sensitive indicators that capture broader outcomes including physical health, functional outcomes, family experience, and family well-being. Also highlighted is, the weak evidence linking process indicators to improved patient outcomes, a focus on negative outcomes, such as mortality, and the lack of theoretical foundations for nursing-sensitive indicators. There is a lack of consensus on what components to measure, definitions of indicators, and appropriate methodologies for the development of nursing sensitive indicators. Donabedian's (1988) structures, processes, and outcomes framework is discussed as well as an overview of adaptations used to improve the quality of indicator sets in a variety of settings. By situating the discussion within the context of children's and young people's nursing, this paper aims to direct future research towards the development of comprehensive indicators that capture the full contribution of nursing to the care of children and young people with complex and integrated care needs. Ultimately, this paper advocates for a standardised, holistic approach to nursing-sensitive indicators for this vulnerable population to improve care quality and overall health and wellbeing for children, young people, and their families.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We conducted a quality improvement initiative to implement standardized screening for anxiety among adolescents with headache and/or epilepsy receiving outpatient neurology care at a quaternary health care system, consistent with recommendations from the American Academy of Neurology. Our SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Based) aim was to screen ≥90% of established patients aged 12 years or older seen by a participating health care professional using a standardized anxiety screener by February 2024. METHODS: This initiative was conducted in patients seen for follow-up by 17 participating neurology health care professionals. Health care professional opinions were assessed before and after implementation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), administered as a previsit questionnaire distributed using the electronic health record. The integrated workflow included a best practice advisory (BPA) alert that permitted easy access to interventions and automatic population of education materials into the after-visit summary. After 12 months of use (March 2023 to February 2024), we assessed demographic and diagnostic information, GAD-7 completion rates, anxiety symptom severity, BPA utilization, and health care professional acceptance of the intervention. RESULTS: The GAD-7 was completed for 64% of 3,671 encounters and by 71% of 2031 unique patients. The GAD-7 was more often completed for encounters if the patient was female, younger, or White or had a headache diagnosis. Among unique patients, anxiety symptoms were minimal in 50%, mild in 24%, moderate in 17%, and severe in 10%. Severe anxiety symptoms were more often present in female patients or those with a headache diagnosis. Among patients with severe anxiety symptoms, 66% had established behavioral health care plans and, for remaining patients, referrals were made to community behavioral health care professionals (11%), or pediatric psychologists (4%) or social workers (3%) within neurology. Clinicians indicated that the approach was easy to use and improved the quality of patient care. DISCUSSION: We implemented standardized EHR-based screening for anxiety symptoms for pediatric neurology patients, most of whom had headache or epilepsy. Screening was feasible, and approximately one-quarter of patients had moderate or severe anxiety symptoms. Future work will focus on improving completion rates of previsit questionnaires including the GAD-7 and optimizing clinician actions based on the screening data.

BACKGROUND: The transition from pediatric to adult care poses a significant health system-level challenge impeding the delivery of quality health services for youth with chronic health conditions. In Canada and globally, the transition to adult care is regarded as a top priority in adolescent health in need of readily applicable, adaptable, and relevant national metrics to evaluate and benchmark transition success across disease populations and clinical care settings. Unfortunately, existing literature fails to account for the lack of engagement from youth and caregivers in developing indicators, and its applicability across chronic conditions, primary care involvement, and health equity considerations. OBJECTIVE: Our proposed study aims to establish a consensus-driven set of quality indicators for the transition to adult care that are universally applicable across physical, developmental, and mental health conditions, clinical care settings, and health jurisdictions. METHODS: Using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach, a panel comprising youth, caregivers, interdisciplinary health care providers, and health system leaders will be established to collaborate with our research team to ensure that the study methodology, materials, and knowledge dissemination are suitable and reflect the perspectives of youth and their families. We will then conduct an iterative 3-round Online Modified Delphi (OMD) study (n=160) to (1) compare and contrast the perspectives of youth, caregivers, health care providers, and health system leaders on quality indicators for transition; and (2) prioritize a key set of quality indicators for transition applicable across disease populations that are the most important, useful, and feasible in the Canadian context. Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RAM) multistage analytic approach, data from each panel and stakeholder group will be examined separately and compared to establish a key set of indicators endorsed by both panels. RESULTS: The study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Physicians Services Incorporated. CONCLUSIONS: This study will produce quality indicators to evaluate and inform action equitably to improve transition from pediatric to adult care for youth and their families in Canada. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/60860.