Literature Collection

To assess whether primary care medical homes (PCMHs) are accurately identified for patients receiving care in a specialty mental health clinic within an integrated public delivery system. This study reviewed the electronic records of patients in a large urban mental health clinic. The study defined 'matching PCMH' if the same primary care clinic was listed in both the mental health and medical electronic records. This study designated all others as 'PCMH unknown.' This study assessed whether demographic factors predicted PCMH status using chi-square tests. Among 229 patients (66% male; mean age 49; 36% White, 30% Black, and 17% Asian), 72% had a matching PCMH. Sex, age, race, psychiatric diagnosis, and psychotropic medication use were not associated with matching PCMH. To improve care coordination and health outcomes for people with severe mental illness, greater efforts are needed to ensure the accurate designation of PCMHs in all mental health patient electronic records.

To assess whether primary care medical homes (PCMHs) are accurately identified for patients receiving care in a specialty mental health clinic within an integrated public delivery system. This study reviewed the electronic records of patients in a large urban mental health clinic. The study defined 'matching PCMH' if the same primary care clinic was listed in both the mental health and medical electronic records. This study designated all others as 'PCMH unknown.' This study assessed whether demographic factors predicted PCMH status using chi-square tests. Among 229 patients (66% male; mean age 49; 36% White, 30% Black, and 17% Asian), 72% had a matching PCMH. Sex, age, race, psychiatric diagnosis, and psychotropic medication use were not associated with matching PCMH. To improve care coordination and health outcomes for people with severe mental illness, greater efforts are needed to ensure the accurate designation of PCMHs in all mental health patient electronic records.

National and international aged care frameworks recommend family-integrated care to enhance care quality and outcomes, supported by evidence demonstrating improvements in patient and clinician experiences. Yet uncertainty remains about how to integrate family carers effectively in diverse healthcare models and settings for neurodegenerative and mental health conditions. A systematic integrative review was conducted to answer two research questions: how do the studies describe the integration of family carers in health services design and delivery for older patients with neurodegenerative and mental health conditions? And what is the evidence for family-integrated care models impacting the health and wellbeing of these older patients? Structured and iterative searches of five databases (CINAHL, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, PsycINFO, and ProQuest) and the Google Scholar search engine identified 2271 records. A Covidence screening process resulted in 14 studies for review, comprising randomised controlled trials, mixed methods studies, qualitative studies, and quasi-experimental designs. The following four themes emerged from the evidence synthesis: (1) family participation in service delivery, (2) health and wellbeing outcomes, (3) satisfaction with care, and (4) service dynamics in enabling family-integrated care successfully. This review highlights that while family-integrated care models contribute to positive health and wellbeing outcomes for older patients with neurodegenerative and mental health conditions, challenges remain for implementation due to the extent and variability in integration strategies, a lack of rigorous evaluation, and an absence of standardised frameworks.