Literature Collection

In December 2024, Santé Québec (SQ), a province-wide agency overseeing health and social services delivery, was launched. Denis's essay offers an insightful and valuable lens to analyze the reform's underlying assumptions and to reflect on the opportunities and challenges ahead. SQ aims to separate policy making and planning from service delivery, a distinction that may prove difficult in practice. Moreover, the infrastructure for meaningful decentralization might be lacking, given Quebec's health system legacy of extensive structural integration. Nonetheless, existing assets - such as health regions, population-based responsibility and local health and social services networks - could prove to be valuable tools for stakeholder engagement and innovation.

Recognizing the current opioid crisis among justice-involved individuals and the need to intervene at the intersection of justice and community health, the JCOIN TCU hub study explores outcomes associated with a multi-level hybrid implementation approach. The study capitalizes on facilitated collaboration, training, and cross-system data sharing to leverage improvements in criminal justice (CJ) and community behavioral health (CBH) interagency collaboration. The goal is to improve local community public health and safety outcomes for reentering justice-involved individuals who have a history of (or are at risk for) using opioids. The study compares two implementation strategies: one (vertical) in which all units in a community are trained and begin the program simultaneously and another (horizontal) in which one lead-off unit in the community is trained as a prototype of the program, the prototype is tested and refined, and then the lead-off unit helps to train other units within the community. Specific aims are to 1) increase access to and retention in CBH and medications for opioid use disorder services; 2) improve outcomes associated with public health and safety; 3) compare two implementation strategies on systems-level outcomes designed to increase service initiation and receipt of implementation and services; and 4) examine the impact of these strategies on justice-involved individuals' outcomes. The study examines both implementation and implementation-effectiveness, seeking to answer the questions of which implementation strategy is most effective for rapid and sustainable uptake of evidence-based practices and for increasing service linkage and initiation, services retention, and improved opioid-related public health safety outcomes. The study uses a hybrid type 3 study design. The study's primary aim is to compare two implementation strategies and two interventions at two levels (client and system), with a secondary aim to assess client-level outcomes associated with the trial. The study design integrates 2 robust methodologies (stepped wedge and cluster randomized trial), and plans to include 18 research performance sites (communities) located in Texas, New Mexico, and Illinois. The study will contribute to the JCOIN network's effort to establish a national consortium of investigators examining promising strategies to enhance the capabilities and capacity of the justice system to more effectively address the opioid epidemic.

IMPORTANCE: Emerging evidence suggests that integrated care models are associated with improved mental health care access and outcomes for youths (children ≤12 years and adolescents 12-21 years) served in pediatric primary care settings. However, the key components of these complex models remain unexamined. OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the key components of effective pediatric integrated mental health care models. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials electronic databases were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 1985, and April 30, 2019. Articles were restricted to those published in the English language. Eligible articles reported original data on youths 17 years or younger, implemented an integrated mental health care model in a pediatric primary care setting, and assessed the model's association with primary outcomes (eg, mental health symptom severity) and secondary outcomes (eg, functional impairment and patient satisfaction). Articles that specified some degree of systematic coordination or collaboration between primary care and mental health professionals were included in the final review. Two independent reviewers extracted data on study design, model type, model components, level of integration, and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad scale. Data were analyzed between January 1, 2018, and May 31, 2019. FINDINGS: Eleven randomized clinical trials involving 2190 participants were included. Three studies focused on youths with depression, 3 on youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and 5 on youths with behavioral disorders. Most studies (9 of 11) implemented either the collaborative care model (n = 3), a slightly modified version of the collaborative care model (n = 2), or colocated care (n = 4). The most commonly reported components of effective pediatric integrated mental health care models were population-based care, measurement-based care, and delivery of evidence-based mental health services; all 3 components were present in studies reporting clinical improvement of mental health symptoms. Other model components, such as treatment-to-target or team-based care, were common in studies reporting specific outcomes, such as functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This review is the first to date to systematically search and qualitatively synthesize information on the key components of effective pediatric integrated mental health care models. This knowledge may be especially useful for pediatric primary care administrators in the selection of an integrated care model for their setting.

OBJECTIVES: The demand for home care services has increased with the growth of the older population. Currently, home care workers (HCWs) are experiencing challenges such as poor working conditions, high turnover, fragmented services and dissatisfied clients, which are indicative of limitations on HCWs' ability to provide quality integrated home care to older people. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review to identify the key elements that affect the capabilities of the HCWs in providing quality integrated care to older people in their homes. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane, Analysis & Policy Observatory, Australian Association of Gerontology (Australia), WHO, Trove (Australia), Social Care Online (UK) and Google between January 2014 and August 2025. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies were included if they focused on the analysis of HCWs' experience in providing care to older people within home settings and were published in the English language between January 2014 and August 2025. RESULTS: 19 studies met the inclusion criteria out of 2844 retrieved articles. Most studies were conducted in North America (n=8). Qualitative studies were the most commonly reported (n=16). The findings of the studies were combined and categorised into four themes using a narrative synthesis approach. The four themes identified were HCWs' capability through (1) collaborative practice, (2) education and training, (3) structural conditions at work and (4) personal attributes. CONCLUSION: This scoping review on home care for older people highlights four interconnected pillars that shape HCWs' capabilities. This review provides valuable insights to inform the standards and policies to strengthen HCWs' capabilities across these domains. Future study is needed to explore the measures taken by agencies to understand and address key elements of HCWs' capability.