Literature Collection

Aims: This study concerns the perspectives of Indigenous persons who use injection drugs (IPWIDs) and key stakeholders across multiple sectors regarding healthcare service and treatment accessibility in the United States.Methods: Sixty in-depth interviews were undertaken with selected participants (30 people who use injection drugs and 30 stakeholders) across three non-urban locations in the United States. An inductive analytic approach was used to explore perspectives regarding healthcare accessibility gaps.Results: IPWIDs described injecting stimulants, opioids, and diverted medications for opioid use disorder, as well as having unstable access to sterile syringes. Often, the most accessible treatment for IPWID substance use was engagement with punitive aspects of the criminal justice system. While local health and social services were described as providing limited or inadequate services for IPWIDs, human capital deficiencies in those agencies and institutions often reinforced barriers to accessibility for IPWIDs, further aggravating the epidemics of Hepatitis C Virus infection and overdose risk in Indigenous communities. Conclusions: Decolonizing approaches to IPWID-centered services are urgently needed to reduce disparities in transmission of infectious diseases and other health consequences of injection drug use among American Indian people. Potential pathways forward include moving away from punitive treatment of IPWIDs by the criminal justice system and toward local, tribally-centered, culturally appropriate treatment models. We identify an urgent need to provide reliable and local access to sterile injection equipment and opioid substitution treatment on or near reservations.

Aims: This study concerns the perspectives of Indigenous persons who use injection drugs (IPWIDs) and key stakeholders across multiple sectors regarding healthcare service and treatment accessibility in the United States.Methods: Sixty in-depth interviews were undertaken with selected participants (30 people who use injection drugs and 30 stakeholders) across three non-urban locations in the United States. An inductive analytic approach was used to explore perspectives regarding healthcare accessibility gaps.Results: IPWIDs described injecting stimulants, opioids, and diverted medications for opioid use disorder, as well as having unstable access to sterile syringes. Often, the most accessible treatment for IPWID substance use was engagement with punitive aspects of the criminal justice system. While local health and social services were described as providing limited or inadequate services for IPWIDs, human capital deficiencies in those agencies and institutions often reinforced barriers to accessibility for IPWIDs, further aggravating the epidemics of Hepatitis C Virus infection and overdose risk in Indigenous communities. Conclusions: Decolonizing approaches to IPWID-centered services are urgently needed to reduce disparities in transmission of infectious diseases and other health consequences of injection drug use among American Indian people. Potential pathways forward include moving away from punitive treatment of IPWIDs by the criminal justice system and toward local, tribally-centered, culturally appropriate treatment models. We identify an urgent need to provide reliable and local access to sterile injection equipment and opioid substitution treatment on or near reservations.

BACKGROUND: Mental health conditions are often underdiagnosed and undertreated in primary care, particularly in underserved areas. Integrated behavioral health models can address this gap, but their reliance on mental health professionals may limit scalability. A multi-level intervention based on the chronic care model may enhance mental health care delivery in resource-limited settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a chronic care model-based primary care behavioral health integration program for improving the diagnosis and management of mental health conditions in a primary care setting. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, pre-post observational study using interrupted time series analysis over a 10-year period (2010-2019). PARTICIPANTS: In total, 59,723 adult patients aged >18 who had at least two medical visits between 2010 and 2019. The patient population was 58% non-Hispanic Black, 29% non-Hispanic White, and 64% female. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of clinical decision support systems for common mental health conditions (e.g., depression, anxiety, ADHD), self-management support, delivery system re-design within integrated behavioral health services, and health system community support with weekly behavioral health tips. MAIN MEASURES: Changes in the rate of mental health diagnoses and follow-up care (including psychiatric medications, referrals to psychiatry or behavioral medicine, and primary care visits with a mental health diagnosis). KEY RESULTS: The rate of mental health diagnoses increased by 58.8 per 1000 person-years in the first year after intervention implementation (p = 0.001). Follow-up care in primary care increased by 102.1 per 1000 person-years (p = 0.03), while psychiatry referrals decreased by 59.8 per 1000 person-years annually after the intervention (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This chronic care model-based system-level intervention was associated with significant increases in mental health diagnosis and treatment within primary care. Expanding the role of primary care in managing mental health conditions may offer a scalable solution to mental health professional shortages, especially in underserved areas.

BACKGROUND: Opioid overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids, particularly illicitly manufactured fentanyl, remain a substantial public health concern in North America. Responses to overdose events (e.g., administration of naloxone and rescue breathing) are effective at reducing mortality; however, more interventions are needed to prevent overdoses involving illicitly manufactured fentanyl. This study protocol aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a behavior change intervention that incorporates individual counseling, practical training in fentanyl test strip use, and distribution of fentanyl test strips for take-home use among people who use drugs. METHODS: Residents of Rhode Island aged 18-65 years who report recent substance use (including prescription pills obtained from the street; heroin, powder cocaine, crack cocaine, methamphetamine; or any drug by injection) (n = 500) will be recruited through advertisements and targeted street-based outreach into a two-arm randomized clinical trial with 12 months of post-randomization follow-up. Eligible participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive either the RAPIDS intervention (i.e., fentanyl-specific overdose education, behavior change motivational interviewing (MI) sessions focused on using fentanyl test strips to reduce overdose risk, fentanyl test strip training, and distribution of fentanyl test strips for personal use) or standard overdose education as control. Participants will attend MI booster sessions (intervention) or attention-matched control sessions at 1, 2, and 3 months post-randomization. All participants will be offered naloxone at enrolment. The primary outcome is a composite measure of self-reported overdose in the previous month at 6- and/or 12-month follow-up visit. Secondary outcome measures include administratively linked data regarding fatal (post-mortem investigation) and non-fatal (hospitalization or emergency medical service utilization) overdoses. DISCUSSION: If the RAPIDS intervention is found to be effective, its brief MI and fentanyl test strip training components could be easily incorporated into existing community-based overdose prevention programming to help reduce the rates of fentanyl-related opioid overdose. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04372238 . Registered on 01 May 2020.