Literature Collection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Injection drug use is a driver of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission, thus integrating HCV care into addiction care is likely necessary for HCV elimination. Here we describe how we integrated HCV care into our addiction medicine (AM) clinic and evaluate its effect on HCV treatment. METHODS: Integrated care involves HCV screening and treatment with either DAA prescription directly in AM clinic or via telemedicine with an infectious diseases (ID) specialist. Using retrospective chart review, we assessed if the program affected rates of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) initiation, DAA completion, and sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: Among 72 treatment naïve patients, the rate of DAA initiation increased after integrated care (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.05-4.66), but rates of DAA completion or SVR did not significantly increase. Integrated care was associated with more DAA prescriptions (0.6 vs. 0 prescriptions per month, p = .004) and decreased referrals to hepatology (0.2 vs. 1 referrals per month, p = .001). Compared to referring patients to hepatology, prescribing DAAs in AM clinic was associated with higher rates of DAA initiation (HR 42.46; 95% CI: 15.25-118.24) and completion (HR 8.33; 95% CI: 2.76-25.16). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: An integrated care program that involved both in-person and telemedicine options improve access to DAA therapy. Enhancing interprofessional collaboration and expanding telemedicine services offers a practical model for strengthening HCV care delivery. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates a practical approach to integrating HCV care into addiction treatment through development of inter-professional collaboration between healthcare specialties.

BACKGROUND: The specific aims of this project were to create a fully integrated, nurse-led model of a psychiatric nurse practitioner and behavioral health care team within primary care to facilitate (1) patients receiving an appropriate level of care and (2) care team members performing at the top of their scope of practice. METHOD: The guiding model for process implementation was Rapid Cycle Quality Improvement. Three task forces were established to develop interventions in the areas of Roles and Responsibilities, Training and Implementation, and the electronic health record. INTERVENTION: The four interventions that emerged from these task forces were (1) the establishment of patient tiers based on diagnosis, medications, and risk assessment; (2) the creation of process maps to engage care team members; (3) just-in-time education regarding psychiatric medication management for primary care providers; and (4) use of a registry to track patients. RESULTS: The process measures of referrals to the psychiatric care team and psychiatric assessment intakes performed as expected. Both measures were higher at the onset of the project and lower 1 year later. The outcome indicator, number of case reviews, increased dramatically over time. CONCLUSIONS: For psychiatric nurse practitioners, this quality improvement effort provides evidence that a consultative role can be effective in supporting primary care providers. Through providing education, establishing patient tiers, and establishing an effective workflow, more patients may have access to psychiatric services.

BACKGROUND: Older people with serious mental ill health have high levels of physical comorbidity. Despite this, mental health services receive limited physical health support from primary or secondary care. This study investigated the facilitators and barriers to delivering physical healthcare for older people in mental health settings. METHODS: In total, 54 semi-structured interviews (REC:22/IEC08/0022) were conducted with different stakeholders [staff (n = 28), patients (n = 7), carers (n = 19)] across two mental health hospitals. Interviews explored the facilitators and barriers to delivering physical healthcare for older people (>65 years) receiving secondary mental healthcare (dementia and psychiatric disorders). Data were analysed thematically, underpinned by a framework of integrated care for individuals living with multimorbidity. RESULTS: A 'multidisciplinary approach' was valued, particularly to identify patients for targeted physical health support. There was felt to be a loss of physical health 'training and skills' over time, particularly amongst nursing and medical staff. Admissions to the acute hospital were potentially avoidable through improved 'support and availability of physical health expertise', to provide more proactive than reactive care. Alongside improved training and support, managing advanced care planning, end of life care and polypharmacy were perceived to facilitate improved physical healthcare in mental health settings. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of senior physical health leadership (e.g. geriatrician or general practitioner) and loss of skills and confidence in managing physical health in mental health settings have led to a low threshold for admissions to the acute hospital. In particular, services should support advanced care planning and end of life care from physical causes in mental health settings.

Importance: Prescription opioid misuse is a national crisis. Few interventions have improved adherence to opioid-prescribing guidelines. Objective: To determine whether a multicomponent intervention, Transforming Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care (TOPCARE; http://mytopcare.org/), improves guideline adherence while decreasing opioid misuse risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cluster-randomized clinical trial among 53 primary care clinicians (PCCs) and their 985 patients receiving long-term opioid therapy for pain. The study was conducted from January 2014 to March 2016 in 4 safety-net primary care practices. Interventions: Intervention PCCs received nurse care management, an electronic registry, 1-on-1 academic detailing, and electronic decision tools for safe opioid prescribing. Control PCCs received electronic decision tools only. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes included documentation of guideline-concordant care (both a patient-PCC agreement in the electronic health record and at least 1 urine drug test [UDT]) over 12 months and 2 or more early opioid refills. Secondary outcomes included opioid dose reduction (ie, 10% decrease in morphine-equivalent daily dose [MEDD] at trial end) and opioid treatment discontinuation. Adjusted outcomes controlled for differing baseline patient characteristics: substance use diagnosis, mental health diagnoses, and language. Results: Of the 985 participating patients, 519 were men, and 466 were women (mean [SD] patient age, 54.7 [11.5] years). Patients received a mean (SD) MEDD of 57.8 (78.5) mg. At 1 year, intervention patients were more likely than controls to receive guideline-concordant care (65.9% vs 37.8%; P < .001; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 6.0; 95% CI, 3.6-10.2), to have a patient-PCC agreement (of the 376 without an agreement at baseline, 53.8% vs 6.0%; P < .001; AOR, 11.9; 95% CI, 4.4-32.2), and to undergo at least 1 UDT (74.6% vs 57.9%; P < .001; AOR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.8-5.0). There was no difference in odds of early refill receipt between groups (20.7% vs 20.1%; AOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). Intervention patients were more likely than controls to have either a 10% dose reduction or opioid treatment discontinuation (AOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.1; P < .001). In adjusted analyses, intervention patients had a mean (SE) MEDD 6.8 (1.6) mg lower than controls (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: A multicomponent intervention improved guideline-concordant care but did not decrease early opioid refills. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01909076.

PURPOSE: The development of an outpatient psychiatry clinical practice learning experience for PGY2 ambulatory care pharmacy residents in preparation for the treatment of psychiatric disorders in the primary care setting is described. SUMMARY: With the increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders, significant mortality, and limited access to care, integration of mental health treatment into the primary care setting is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Given the majority of mental health treatment occurs in the primary care setting, pharmacists in patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are in a unique position with direct access to patients to effectively manage these illnesses. However, the increased need for pharmacist education and training in psychiatry has prompted a large, Midwestern academic health system to develop an outpatient psychiatry learning experience for PGY2 (Postgraduate Year 2) ambulatory care pharmacy residents in 2015. The goal of this learning experience is to introduce the PGY2 ambulatory care residents to the role and impact of psychiatric clinical pharmacists and to orient the residents to the basics of psychiatric pharmacotherapy to be applied to their future practice in the primary care setting. CONCLUSION: The development of an outpatient psychiatry learning experience for PGY2 ambulatory care pharmacy residents will allow for more integrated and comprehensive care for patients with psychiatric conditions, many of whom are treated and managed in the PCMH setting.