Literature Collection

We conducted a quality improvement (QI) study to increase rates of firearm screening/safety counseling by 25% over 10 months for children (4-18 years) at preventive visits in an academic continuity clinic. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles consisted of 1) (January 2023) educating providers about best practices for screening, safe storage counseling, and use of cable firearm locks; 2) (May 2023) revising the preventive visit note template to prompt providers on best practices; and 3) (September 2023) providing caregiver educational resources to support safe storage practices. The baseline firearm screening rate was 38%. After PDSA 1, screening rates were 34%; following PDSA 2, screening rates increased to 82.5%; after PDSA 3, rates were 95%. This QI intervention increased provider screening for firearms, confidence in safety counseling, and confidence in the use of cable firearm locks during preventive visits. Revising the note template had the largest effect on increasing screening rates.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a pharmacistled intervention would increase the number of naloxone prescriptions and naloxone administration education in a primary care family medicine setting. DESIGN: Prospective quality improvement intervention in an academic family medicine clinic. METHODS: We surveyed providers about naloxone knowledge, prescribing habits, and prescribing barriers. We identified patients on chronic opioid therapy, through electronic health records for the year 2019. Overdose risk categories based upon morphine milligram equivalent doses and concomitant benzodiazepine use were used to determine patients who met criteria for naloxone. Pharmacists phoned qualified patients to discuss overdose risk and naloxone benefits. Patients who accepted naloxone prescriptions used their local pharmacy through a department-approved standing order set. RESULTS: From the survey results, there were 47 of 54 provider responses, and the majority noted that they do not routinely prescribe naloxone in high-risk patients. The predominant barriers were lack of time during visit and naloxone administration education. The population of patients from chart review included 93 high-risk patients with a mean age of 58 years. During the time of intervention, 71 patients remained eligible for naloxone coprescribing. Of the patients contacted, 29 (40 percent) accepted the intervention prescription, and subsequently, 22 picked up their prescription from the pharmacy. Sixteen received counseling with a support person. Twelve patients had naloxone already at home, and two received counseling with a support person. CONCLUSION: The naloxone prescribing intervention is achievable. The results of this intervention support identifying patients at increased risk of opioid overdose and offer education of a support person for naloxone in a large academic family medicine clinic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Women of reproductive age with substance use (SU) disorders have lower rates of contraceptive use and higher rates of unintended pregnancy than women without SU disorders and are less likely to access treatment than men. Integration of SU and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, using a model known as Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT), has been proven effective in reducing SU and improving health care equity. The SBIRT model includes screening, brief intervention (a short client-centered conversation providing an opportunity to identify/discuss concerns), and referral to treatment. The purpose of this study was to test whether an established quality improvement (QI) learning collaborative model could be used to support SU and SRH sites in implementing an SBIRT/SBIRT-like model to improve health outcomes for women. Five SRH sites and 4 SU sites across New York State participated in the Partnership to Advance Integrated Referrals (PAIR), an 18-month QI learning collaborative designed and implemented by Public Health Solutions. METHODS: Six standardized mixed-methods data collection tools were used over 18 months to gather process and outcome data from over 130 QI team members and site staff and over 5000 clients. RESULTS: By the end of PAIR, QI team members and site staff showed a reduction in bias, increased knowledge and comfort, increased rating of organizational practices related to client-centered care, and increased access to peer learning, information about best practices, and training and technical assistance. SU sites increased SRH screening from 47.9% in the first quarter of data collection to 67.4% in the final quarter and increased brief interventions from 92.5% in the first quarter to 100.0% in the final quarter. Similarly, SRH sites increased SU screening from 51.6% to 75.6% and increased brief interventions from 81.3% to 85.1%. The processes and outcomes were very different for the SU and SRH sites, and their varying successes and challenges are discussed. Making and verifying referrals remained challenging. CONCLUSIONS: The results of PAIR demonstrated the feasibility of SU and SRH sites implementing an SBIRT/SBIRT-like model when supported by a QI learning collaborative. Larger community and organizational challenges (COVID-19, staff turnover) still present barriers to improved reproductive health and SU outcomes for women.