Literature Collection
12K+
References
11K+
Articles
1600+
Grey Literature
4800+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
This review examines the unique challenges military-connected children face in accessing pediatric mental health care, particularly for conditions like anxiety, depression, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. National survey data highlight disparities in access, especially among children of active-duty service members, and underscores the need for improved identification, provider training, and integration of behavioral health into primary care. The review calls for both military and civilian systems to expand access, reduce stigma, and strengthen provider readiness to manage common mental health concerns in primary care settings, ultimately supporting the well-being and resilience of military families.
Central nervous system (CNS)-active medications pose serious health risks for older adults with dementia but are nonetheless commonly used. Few deprescribing interventions have focused on people with dementia. We conducted a one-arm pilot study in six primary care practices of an integrated healthcare system between February and August 2023. The deprescribing intervention consisted of patient/care partner education and self-management materials and provider decision support. Participants were aged 60+ with diagnosed dementia and prescribed at least one CNS-active medication for three or more months of the six-month period prior to study start. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and feasibility of ascertaining medication discontinuation and medically treated falls. The intervention was delivered to all (N = 114) eligible participants; their mean age was 80 ± 9 years; 72% were female and 13% non-White. Intervention acceptability, assessed by Weiner's Acceptability of Intervention measure, was rated 3.5/5 (range 1-5; higher scores indicate higher acceptability). Among baseline antipsychotic users (N = 89), 39 (43.8%) had discontinued at follow-up. Among baseline tricyclic antidepressant users (N = 11), 6 (54.5%) had discontinued at follow-up. Among baseline skeletal muscle relaxant users (N = 3), 2 (66.7%) had discontinued at follow-up. Among baseline benzodiazepine users (N = 3), 1 (33.3%) had discontinued at follow-up. Among baseline opioid users (N = 13), 1 (7.7%) had discontinued at follow-up. Medically treated falls occurred among 22% at baseline vs. 21% at follow-up. The intervention is feasible and acceptable and may achieve meaningful reduction in CNS-active medication prescriptions. Findings support a controlled trial with sufficient power to assess effects on relevant clinical outcomes.
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.


This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.




Objective: Depression is the most common psychiatric comorbidity among people with opioid use disorders (OUDs). However, whether and how comorbid depression is associated with the outcomes of opioid agonist therapy (OAT) remains poorly understood. The objective of this review was to identify and describe the association between depression and main outcomes (opioid use and treatment retention) of methadone and buprenorphine treatment among people with OUDs. Methods: A literature review was conducted by searching five electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews [EBMR], and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL] Complete) from January 1970 to April 2019. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts of the identified records by using pre-established eligibility criteria. Next, full texts were reviewed and studies that met inclusion criteria were selected. Finally, a descriptive synthesis of extracted data was performed. Results: In total, 12,296 records were identified and 18 studies that met inclusion criteria were retained. Of these, six studies reported reduced opioid use and seven reported increased opioid use during methadone or buprenorphine treatment. In addition, three studies reported an increased retention rate and four documented a decreased retention rate during methadone or buprenorphine treatment. The remaining studies did not find any significant association between depression and opioid use or treatment retention. Overall, the evidence did not demonstrate a consistent association between depression and outcomes of methadone or buprenorphine treatment. Conclusions: Although the inconsistent nature of the current evidence prohibited us from drawing definitive conclusions, we posit that the presence of depression among OUDs patients may not always predict negative outcomes related to retention and drug use during the course of OAT. Particularly, the hypothesis that adequate treatment of depression can improve treatment retention is promising and is in line with the call for increased efforts to provide integrated care for comorbid mental health disorders and addiction. Future studies with rigorous methodology are essential to better characterize the complex interplay between depression, OAT, and OUDs.



Pagination
Page 164 Use the links to move to the next, previous, first, or last page.
