Literature Collection

INTRODUCTION: While bipolar disorder is not uncommon in primary care, collaborative care models for bipolar depression treatment are underdeveloped. Our aim was to compare initial pharmacological treatment patterns for an episode of bipolar depression in different care models, namely primary care (PC), integrated behavioral health (IBH), and mood specialty clinic (SC). METHODS: A retrospective study of adults diagnosed with bipolar disorder who received outpatient care in 2020 was completed. Depressive episodes were captured based on DSM-5 criteria, ICD codes, or de novo emergent symptom burden (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Pharmacological strategies were classified as 1) continuation of current regimen, 2) dose increase or 3) augmentation 4) switch to monotherapy or 5) a combination of more than two different strategies. Logistic regression was applied. RESULTS: A total of 217 encounters (PC = 32, IBH = 53, SC = 132) representing 186 unique patients were identified. PC was significantly more likely to continue the current regimen, while combination strategies were significantly more likely recommended in IBH and SC. Mood stabilizers were significantly more utilized in IBH and SC. There were no significant group differences in antidepressant use. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study design at a single site. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence of delays in depression care in bipolar disorder. This is the first study to compare treatment recommendations for bipolar depression in different clinical settings. Future studies are encouraged to better understand this gap and to guide future clinical practice, regardless of care model, emphasizing the potential benefits of decision support tools and collaborative care models tailored for bipolar depression.

OBJECTIVES: Universal screening for depression during pregnancy and postpartum is recommended, yet mental health treatment and follow-up rates among screen-positive women in rural settings are low. We studied the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of perinatal depression treatment integrated into a rural obstetric setting. METHODS: We conducted an open treatment study of a screening and intervention program modified from the Depression Attention for Women Now (DAWN) Collaborative Care model in a rural obstetric clinic. Depression screen-positive pregnant and postpartum women received problem-solving therapy (PST) with or without antidepressants. A care manager coordinated communication between patient, obstetrician and psychiatric consultant. We measured change in the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score. We used surveys and focus groups to measure patient and provider satisfaction and analyzed focus groups using qualitative analysis. RESULTS: The intervention was well accepted by providers and patients, based on survey and focus group data. Feasibility was also evidenced by recruitment (87.1%) and retention (92.6%) rates and depression outcomes (64% with >50% improvement in PHQ 9) which were comparable to clinical trials in similar urban populations. Conclusions for practice: DAWN Collaborative Care modified for treatment of perinatal depression in a rural obstetric setting is feasible and acceptable. Behavioral health services integrated into rural obstetric settings could improve care for perinatal depression.

This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the demographic and geographic variations in the visit rate for first-episode psychosis (FEP), identify trends and diagnostic patterns, and explore factors associated with FEP visits in Nebraska. Inpatient and emergency department data spanning 2017-2021 were collected by the Nebraska Hospital Association (NHA). The study focused on Nebraska residents aged 14-35 admitted for FEP, identified through specific ICD-10 codes. The sample was derived using a multi-step process, and the data included patient demographics, Behavioral Health Regions, rural vs. urban residency, and neighborhood characteristics. Mann-Kendall tests were used to test for significant trends over time. T-tests and chi-squared tests were used to assess differences in each of the measures between patients with and without psychotic disorders. The study findings revealed a significant increase in visits related to psychotic disorders from 2017 to 2021. In 2021, the FEP visit rate was 116 per 100,000 individuals, varying considerably by age, gender, and Behavioral Health Region. Schizoaffective disorder bipolar type was the most frequent psychotic disorder. Patients with psychotic disorders tended to be older, predominantly male, and treated in acute care settings. The rising trend underlines the need for continued investment in early intervention programs and highlights challenges in rural areas, necessitating targeted interventions. The findings provide valuable insights to inform planning, advocate for funding, and address the specific needs of diverse populations. Future research should explore additional influencing factors and extend the study period to understand FEP trends comprehensively.