Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
10858 Results
3284
Effectiveness of collaborative care depression treatment in Veterans' Affairs primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. C. Hedrick, E. F. Chaney, B. Felker, C. F. Liu, N. Hasenberg, P. Heagerty, J. Buchanan, R. Bagala, D. Greenberg, G. Paden, S. D. Fihn, W. Katon
Year: 2003
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
3285
Effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in human immunodeficiency virus clinics
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. M. Pyne, J. C. Fortney, G. M. Curran, S. Tripathi, J. H. Atkinson, A. M. Kilbourne, H. J. Hagedorn, D. Rimland, M. C. Rodriguez-Barradas, T. Monson, K. A. Bottonari, S. M. Asch, A. L. Gifford
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Depression is common among persons with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and is associated with unfavorable outcomes. METHODS: A single-blind randomized controlled effectiveness trial at 3 Veterans Affairs HIV clinics (HIV Translating Initiatives for Depression Into Effective Solutions [HITIDES]). The HITIDES intervention consisted of an off-site HIV depression care team (a registered nurse depression care manager, pharmacist, and psychiatrist) that delivered up to 12 months of collaborative care backed by a Web-based decision support system. Participants who completed the baseline telephone interview were 249 HIV-infected patients with depression, of whom 123 were randomized to the intervention and 126 to usual care. Participant interview data were collected at baseline and at the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. The primary outcome was depression severity measured using the 20-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) and reported as treatment response (>/=50% decrease in SCL-20 item score), remission (mean SCL-20 item score, <0.5), and depression-free days. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, health status, HIV symptom severity, and antidepressant or HIV medication regimen adherence. RESULTS: Intervention participants were more likely to report treatment response (33.3% vs 17.5%) (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-4.56) and remission (22.0% vs 11.9%) (2.25; 1.11-4.54) at 6 months but not 12 months. Intervention participants reported more depression-free days during the 12 months (beta = 19.3; 95% CI, 10.9-27.6; P < .001). Significant intervention effects were observed for lowering HIV symptom severity at 6 months (beta = -2.6; 95% CI, -3.5 to -1.8; P < .001) and 12 months (beta = -0.82; -1.6 to -0.07; P = .03). Intervention effects were not significant for other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The HITIDES intervention improved depression and HIV symptom outcomes and may serve as a model for collaborative care interventions in HIV and other specialty physical health care settings where patients find their "medical home." TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00304915.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
3286
Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression in Public-Sector Primary Care Clinics Serving Latinos
Type: Journal Article
Authors: I. T. Lagomasino, M. Dwight-Johnson, J. M. Green, L. Tang, L. Zhang, N. Duan, J. Miranda
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Quality improvement interventions for depression care have been shown to be effective for improving quality of care and depression outcomes in settings with primarily insured patients. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of a collaborative care intervention for depression that was tailored for low-income Latino patients seen in public-sector clinics. METHODS: A total of 400 depressed patients from three public-sector primary care clinics were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a tailored collaborative care intervention versus enhanced usual care. Social workers without previous mental health experience served as depression care specialists for the intervention patients (N=196). Depending on patient preference, they delivered a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention or facilitated antidepressant medication given by primary care providers or both. In enhanced usual care, patients (N=204) received a pamphlet about depression, a letter for their primary care provider stating that they had a positive depression screen, and a list of local mental health resources. Intent-to-treat analyses examined clinical and process-of-care outcomes at 16 weeks. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the enhanced usual care group, patients in the intervention group had significantly improved depression, quality of life, and satisfaction outcomes (p<.001 for all). Intervention patients also had significantly improved quality-of-care indicators, including the proportion of patients receiving either psychotherapy or antidepressant medication (77% versus 21%, p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care for depression can greatly improve care and outcomes in public-sector clinics. Social workers without prior mental health experience can effectively provide CBT and manage depression care.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
3288
Effectiveness of collaborative care in addressing depression treatment preferences among low-income Latinos
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. Dwight-Johnson, I. T. Lagomasino, J. Hay, L. Zhang, L. Tang, J. M. Green, N. Duan
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study assessed treatment preferences among low-income Latino patients in public-sector primary care clinics and examined whether a collaborative care intervention that included patient education and allowed patients to choose between medication, therapy, or both would increase the likelihood that patients received preferred treatment. METHODS: A total of 339 Latino patients with probable depressive disorders were recruited; participants completed a baseline conjoint analysis preference survey and were randomly assigned to receive the intervention or enhanced usual care. At 16 weeks, a patient survey assessed depression treatment received during the study period. Logistic regression models were constructed to estimate treatment preferences, examine patient characteristics associated with treatment preferences, and examine patient characteristics associated with a match between stated preference and actual treatment received. RESULTS: The conjoint analysis preference survey showed that patients preferred counseling or counseling plus medication over antidepressant medication alone and that they preferred treatment in primary care over specialty mental health care, but they showed no significant preference for individual versus group treatment. Patients also indicated that individual education sessions, telephone sessions, transportation assistance, and family involvement were barrier reduction strategies that would enhance their likelihood of accepting treatment. Compared with patients assigned to usual care, those in the intervention group were 21 times as likely to receive preferred treatment. Among all participants, women, unemployed persons, those who spoke English, and those referred by providers were more likely to receive preferred treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care interventions that include psychotherapy can increase the likelihood that Latino patients receive preferred care; however, special efforts may be needed to address preferences of working persons, men, and Spanish-speaking patients.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
3289
Effectiveness of collaborative stepped care for anxiety disorders in primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. Muntingh, C. van der Feltz-Cornelis, H. van Marwijk, P. Spinhoven, W. Assendelft, M. de Waal, H. Ader, A. van Balkom
Year: 2014
Publication Place: Switzerland
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Collaborative stepped care (CSC) may be an appropriate model to provide evidence-based treatment for anxiety disorders in primary care. METHODS: In a cluster randomised controlled trial, the effectiveness of CSC compared to care as usual (CAU) for adults with panic disorder (PD) or generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) in primary care was evaluated. Thirty-one psychiatric nurses who provided their services to 43 primary care practices in the Netherlands were randomised to deliver CSC (16 psychiatric nurses, 23 practices) or CAU (15 psychiatric nurses, 20 practices). CSC was provided by the psychiatric nurses (care managers) in collaboration with the general practitioner and a consultant psychiatrist. The intervention consisted of 3 steps, namely guided self-help, cognitive behavioural therapy and antidepressants. Anxiety symptoms were measured with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. RESULTS: We recruited 180 patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of PD or GAD, of whom 114 received CSC and 66 received usual primary care. On the BAI, CSC was superior to CAU [difference in gain scores from baseline to 3 months: -5.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.28 to -1.94; 6 months: -4.65, 95% CI -7.93 to -1.38; 9 months: -5.67, 95% CI -8.97 to -2.36; 12 months: -6.84, 95% CI -10.13 to -3.55]. CONCLUSIONS: CSC, with guided self-help as a first step, was more effective than CAU for primary care patients with PD or GAD.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection
3290
Effectiveness of disease management programs in depression: a systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. Badamgarav, S. R. Weingarten, J. M. Henning, K. Knight, V. Hasselblad, A. J. Gano, J. J. Ofman
Year: 2003
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
3291
Effectiveness of Drug Dependence Treatment in HIV Prevention
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Michael Farrell, Linda Gowing, John Marsden, Walter Ling, Robert Ali
Year: 2005
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
3292
Effectiveness of drug tests in outpatients starting opioid substitution therapy
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. Dupouy, L. Dassieu, R. Bourrel, J. C. Poutrain, S. Bismuth, S. Oustric, M. Lapeyre-Mestre
Year: 2013
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
3293
Effectiveness of Injectable Extended-Release Naltrexone vs Daily Buprenorphine-Naloxone for Opioid Dependence: A Randomized Clinical Noninferiority Trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. Tanum, K. K. Solli, Z. E. Latif, J. S. Benth, A. Opheim, K. Sharma-Haase, P. Krajci, N. Kunoe
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Importance: To date, extended-release naltrexone hydrochloride has not previously been compared directly with opioid medication treatment (OMT), currently the most commonly prescribed treatment for opioid dependence. Objective: To determine whether treatment with extended-release naltrexone will be as effective as daily buprenorphine hydrochloride with naloxone hydrochloride in maintaining abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances in newly detoxified individuals. Design, Setting and Participants: A 12-week, multicenter, outpatient, open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at 5 urban addiction clinics in Norway between November 1, 2012, and December 23, 2015; the last follow-up was performed on October 23, 2015. A total of 232 adult opioid-dependent (per DSM-IV criteria) individuals were recruited from outpatient addiction clinics and detoxification units and assessed for eligibility. Intention-to-treat analyses of efficacy end points were performed with all randomized participants. Interventions: Randomization to either daily oral flexible dose buprenorphine-naloxone, 4 to 24 mg/d, or extended-release naltrexone hydrochloride, 380 mg, administered intramuscularly every fourth week for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points (protocol) were the randomized clinical trial completion rate, the proportion of opioid-negative urine drug tests, and number of days of use of heroin and other illicit opioids. Secondary end points included number of days of use of other illicit substances. Safety was assessed by adverse event reporting. Results: Of 159 participants, mean (SD) age was 36 (8.6) years and 44 (27.7%) were women. Eighty individuals were randomized to extended-release naltrexone and 79 to buprenorphine-naloxone; 105 (66.0%) completed the trial. Retention in the extended-release naltrexone group was noninferior to the buprenorphine-naloxone group (difference, -0.1; with 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.1; P = .04), with mean (SD) time of 69.3 (25.9) and 63.7 (29.9) days, correspondingly (P = .33, log-rank test). Treatment with extended-release naltrexone showed noninferiority to buprenorphine-naloxone on group proportion of total number of opioid-negative urine drug tests (mean [SD], 0.9 [0.3] and 0.8 [0.4], respectively, difference, 0.1 with 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.2; P < .001) and use of heroin (mean difference, -3.2 with 95% CI, -4.9 to -1.5; P < .001) and other illicit opioids (mean difference, -2.7 with 95% CI, -4.6 to -0.9; P < .001). Superiority analysis showed significantly lower use of heroin and other illicit opioids in the extended-release naltrexone group. No significant differences were found between the treatment groups regarding most other illicit substance use. Conclusions and Relevance: Extended-release naltrexone was as effective as buprenorphine-naloxone in maintaining short-term abstinence from heroin and other illicit substances and should be considered as a treatment option for opioid-dependent individuals. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01717963.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
3294
Effectiveness of integrated primary and behavioral healthcare
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. S. Lenz, Julia Dell'Aquila, Richard S. Balkin
Year: 2018
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
3295
Effectiveness of medication assisted treatment for opioid use in prison and jail settings: A meta-analysis and systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. E. Moore, W. Roberts, H. H. Reid, K. M. Z. Smith, L. M. S. Oberleitner, S. A. McKee
Year: 2019
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
3297
Effectiveness of medication for opioid use disorders in transition-age youth: A systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. J. Becker, K. Scott, S. A. Helseth, K. J. Danko, E. M. Balk, I. J. Saldanha, G. P. Adam, D. W. Steele
Year: 2021
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
3298
Effectiveness of Online Collaborative Care for Treating Mood and Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. L. Rollman, Belnap B. Herbeck, K. Z. Abebe, M. B. Spring, A. J. Rotondi, S. D. Rothenberger, J. F. Karp
Year: 2018
Abstract: IMPORTANCE: Collaborative care for depression and anxiety is superior to usual care from primary care physicians for these conditions; however, challenges limit its provision in routine practice and at scale. Advances in technology may overcome these barriers but have yet to be tested. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of combining an internet support group (ISG) with an online computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) provided via a collaborative care program for treating depression and anxiety vs CCBT alone and whether providing CCBT in this manner is more effective than usual care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this 3-arm randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome assessments, primary care physicians from 26 primary care practices in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, referred 2884 patients aged 18 to 75 years in response to an electronic medical record prompt from August 2012 to September 2014. Overall, 704 patients (24.4%) met all eligibility criteria and were randomized to CCBT alone (n?=?301), CCBT+ISG (n?=?302), or usual care (n?=?101). Intent-to-treat analyses were conducted November 2015 to January 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Six months of guided access to an 8-session CCBT program provided by care managers who informed primary care physicians of their patients' progress and promoted patient engagement with our online programs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mental health-related quality of life (12-Item Short-Form Health Survey Mental Health Composite Scale) and depression and anxiety symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) at 6-month follow-up, with treatment durability assessed 6 months later. RESULTS: Of the 704 randomized patients, 562 patients (79.8%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 42.7 (14.3) years. A total of 604 patients (85.8%) completed our primary 6-month outcome assessment. At 6-month assessment, 254 of 301 patients (84.4%) receiving CCBT alone started the program (mean [SD] sessions completed, 5.4 [2.8]), and 228 of 302 patients (75.5%) in the CCBT+ISG cohort logged into the ISG at least once, of whom 141 (61.8%) provided 1 or more comments or posts (mean, 10.5; median [range], 3 [1-306]). Patients receiving CCBT+ISG reported similar 6-month improvements in mental health-related quality of life, mood, and anxiety symptoms compared with patients receiving CCBT alone. However, compared with patients receiving usual care, patients in the CCBT alone cohort reported significant 6-month effect size improvements in mood (effect size, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-0.53) and anxiety (effect size, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.05-0.48) that persisted 6 months later, and completing more CCBT sessions produced greater effect size improvements in mental health-related quality of life and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While providing moderated access to an ISG provided no additional benefit over guided CCBT at improving mental health-related quality of life, mood, and anxiety symptoms, guided CCBT alone is more effective than usual care for these conditions.
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
3299
Effectiveness of peer-supported computer-based CBT for depression among veterans in primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Paul N. Pfeiffer, Brooke Pope, Marc Houck, Wendy Benn-Burton, Kara Zivin, Dara Ganoczy, H. M. Kim, Heather Walters, Lauren Emerson, C. B. Nelson, Kristen M. Abraham, Marcia Valenstein
Year: 2020
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
3300
Effectiveness of Psychological and Educational Interventions to Prevent Depression in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. Conejo-Ceron, P. Moreno-Peral, A. Rodriguez-Morejon, E. Motrico, D. Navas-Campana, A. Rigabert, C. Martin-Perez, A. Rodriguez-Bayon, M. I. Ballesta-Rodriguez, J. D. Luna, J. Garcia-Campayo, M. Roca, J. A. Bellon
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection