Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
10858 Results
1721
Buprenorphine use in the emergency department safe for people who use fentanyl
Type: Web Resource
Authors: National Institutes of Health
Year: 2013
Publication Place: Bethesda, MD
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

1723
Buprenorphine Utilization and Prescribing Among New Jersey Medicaid Beneficiaries After Adoption of Initiatives Designed to Improve Treatment Access
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. Treitler, M. Nowels, H. Samples, S. Crystal
Year: 2023
Abstract:

IMPORTANCE: Buprenorphine is underutilized as a treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD); state policies may improve buprenorphine access and utilization. OBJECTIVE: To assess buprenorphine prescribing trends following New Jersey Medicaid initiatives designed to improve access. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional interrupted time series analysis included New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries who were prescribed buprenorphine and had 12 months continuous Medicaid enrollment, OUD diagnosis, and no Medicare dual eligibility, as well as physician or advanced practitioners who prescribed buprenorphine to Medicaid beneficiaries. The study used Medicaid claims data from 2017 to 2021. EXPOSURE: Implementation of New Jersey Medicaid initiatives in 2019 that removed prior authorizations, increased reimbursement for office-based OUD treatment, and established regional Centers of Excellence. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rate of buprenorphine receipt per 1000 beneficiaries with OUD; percentage of new buprenorphine episodes lasting at least 180 days; buprenorphine prescribing rate per 1000 Medicaid prescribers, overall and by specialty. RESULTS: Of 101 423 Medicaid beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 41.0 [11.6] years; 54 726 [54.0%] male; 30 071 [29.6%] Black, 10 143 [10.0%] Hispanic, and 51 238 [50.5%] White), 20 090 filled at least 1 prescription for buprenorphine from 1788 prescribers. Policy implementation was associated with an inflection point in buprenorphine prescribing trend; after implementation, the trend increased by 36%, from 1.29 (95% CI, 1.02-1.56) prescriptions per 1000 beneficiaries with OUD to 1.76 (95% CI, 1.46-2.06) prescriptions per 1000 beneficiaries with OUD. Among beneficiaries with new buprenorphine episodes, the percentage retained for at least 180 days was stable before and after initiatives were implemented. The initiatives were associated with an increase in the growth rate of buprenorphine prescribers (0.43 per 1000 prescribers; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.51 per 1000 prescribers). Trends were similar across specialties, but increases were most pronounced among primary care and emergency medicine physicians (eg, primary care: 0.42 per 1000 prescribers; 95% CI, 0.32-0.53 per 1000 prescribers). Advanced practitioners accounted for a growing percentage of buprenorphine prescribers, with a monthly increase of 0.42 per 1000 prescribers (95% CI, 0.32-0.52 per 1000 prescribers). A secondary analysis to test for changes associated with non-state-specific secular trends in prescribing found that quarterly trends in buprenorphine prescriptions increased in New Jersey relative to all other states following initiative implementation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cross-sectional study of state-level New Jersey Medicaid initiatives designed to expand buprenorphine access, implementation was associated with an upward trend in buprenorphine prescribing and receipt. No change was observed in the percentage of new buprenorphine treatment episodes lasting 180 or more days, indicating that retention remains a challenge. Findings support implementation of similar initiatives but highlight the need for efforts to support long-term retention.

Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
1724
Buprenorphine versus methadone for opioid dependence: predictor variables for treatment outcome
Type: Journal Article
Authors: G. Gerra, F. Borella, A. Zaimovic, G. Moi, M. Bussandri, C. Bubici, S. Bertacca
Year: 2004
Publication Place: Ireland
Abstract: The present study compared in a clinical non-experimental setting the efficacy of buprenorphine (BUP) and methadone (METH) in the treatment of opioid dependence: all the subjects included in the study showed severe long-lasting heroin addiction. Participants (154) were applicants to a 12 weeks treatment program, who were assigned to either METH (78) (mean doses 81.5 +/- 36.4 mg) or BUP (76) (mean doses 9.2 +/- 3.4 mg) treatment. Aim of the study was to evaluate patient/treatment variables possibly influencing retention rate, abstinence from illicit drugs and mood changes. METH patients showed a higher retention rate at week 4 (78.2 versus 65.8) (P < 0.05), but BUP and METH were equally effective in sustaining retention in treatment and compliance with medication at week 12 (61.5 versus 59.2). Retention rate was influenced by dose, psychosocial functioning and not by psychiatric comorbidity in METH patients. In contrast, BUP maintained patients who completed the observational period showed a significantly higher rate of depression than those who dropped out (P < 0.01) and the intention to treat sample (P < 0.05). No relationship between retention and dose, or retention and psychosocial functioning was evidenced for BUP patients. The risk of positive urine testing was similar between METH and BUP, as expression of illicit drug use in general. At week 12, the patients treated with METH showed more risk of illicit opioid use than those treated with BUP (32.1% versus 25.6%) (P < 0.05). Negative urines were associated with higher doses in both METH and BUP patients. As evidenced for retention, substance abuse history and psychosocial functioning appear unable to influence urinalyses results in BUP patients. Buprenorphine maintained patients who showed negative urines presented a significantly higher rate of depression than those with positive urines (P < 0.05). Alternatively, psychiatric comorbidity was found unrelated to urinalyses results in METH patients. Our data need to be interpreted with caution because of the observational clinical methodology and non-random procedure. The present findings provide further support for the utility of BUP in the treatment of opioid dependency and demonstrate efficacy equivalent to that of METH during a clinical procedure. BUP seems to be more effective than METH in patients affected by depressive traits and dysphoria, probably due to antagonist action on kappa-opioid receptors. Psychosocial functioning and addiction severity cannot be used as valuable predictors of BUP treatment outcome. High doses appear to predict a better outcome, in term of negative urines, for both METH and BUP, but not in term of retention for BUP patients.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1725
Buprenorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid dependence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Louisa Degenhardt, Brodie Clark, Georgina Macpherson, Oscar Leppan, Suzanne Nielsen, Emma Zahra, Briony Larance, Jo Kimber, Daniel Martino-Burke, Matthew Hickman, Michael Farrell
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1726
Buprenorphine vs methadone maintenance treatment for concurrent opioid dependence and cocaine abuse
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. S. Schottenfeld, J. R. Pakes, A. Oliveto, D. Ziedonis, T. R. Kosten
Year: 1997
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
1727
Buprenorphine X-waiver exemption - beyond the basics for the obstetrical provider
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. M. Cleary, M. C. Smid, J. E. Charles, K. M. Jones, M. M. Costantine, G. Saade, K. M. Rood
Year: 2021
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1728
Buprenorphine-Based Regimens and Methadone for the Medical Management of Opioid Dependence: Selecting the Appropriate Drug for Treatment
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Icro Maremmani, Gilberto Gerra
Year: 2010
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1729
Buprenorphine-mediated transition from opioid agonist to antagonist treatment: state of the art and new perspectives
Type: Journal Article
Authors: P. Mannelli, K. S. Peindl, T. Lee, K. S. Bhatia, L. T. Wu
Year: 2012
Publication Place: United Arab Emirates
Abstract: Constant refinement of opioid dependence (OD) therapies is a condition to promote treatment access and delivery. Among other applications, the partial opioid agonist buprenorphine has been studied to improve evidence-based interventions for the transfer of patients from opioid agonist to antagonist medications. This paper summarizes PubMed-searched clinical investigations and conference papers on the transition from methadone maintenance to buprenorphine and from buprenorphine to naltrexone, discussing challenges and advances. The majority of the 26 studies we examined were uncontrolled investigations. Many small clinical trials have demonstrated the feasibility of in- or outpatient transfer to buprenorphine from low to moderate methadone doses (up to 60-70 mg). Results on the conversion from higher methadone doses, on the other hand, indicate significant withdrawal discomfort, and need for ancillary medications and inpatient treatment. Tapering high methadone doses before the transfer to buprenorphine is not without discomfort and the risk of relapse. The transition buprenorphine-naltrexone has been explored in several pilot studies, and a number of treatment methods to reduce withdrawal intensity warrant further investigation, including the co-administration of buprenorphine and naltrexone. Outpatient transfer protocols using buprenorphine, and direct comparisons with other modalities of transitioning from opioid agonist to antagonist medications are limited. Given its potential salience, the information gathered should be used in larger clinical trials on short and long-term outcomes of opioid agonist-antagonist transition treatments. Future studies should also test new pharmacological mechanisms to help reduce physical dependence, and identify individualized approaches, including the use of pharmacogenetics and long-acting opioid agonist and antagonist formulations.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1730
Buprenorphine-Naloxone Maintenance and Lactation
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. M. Jansson, K. McConnell, M. Velez, N. Spencer, M. Gomonit, M. J. Swortwood
Year: 2024
Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding among lactating people with opioid use disorder taking buprenorphine monotherapy is generally accepted, as low concentrations of buprenorphine and metabolites in human milk have been well-established. The use of buprenorphine-naloxone for pregnant and lactating people with opioid use disorder is expanding and there is no information available regarding the concentrations of naloxone and their metabolites in human milk to recommend the use of this combination medication during lactation. RESEARCH AIMS: To determine the concentrations of buprenorphine and naloxone and their primary metabolites in human milk, maternal plasma, and infant plasma, among lactating buprenorphine-naloxone maintained people and their infants. METHODS: Four lactating buprenorphine-naloxone maintained people provided plasma and human milk samples on Days 2, 3, 4, 14, and 30 postpartum. Infant plasma was obtained on Day 14. RESULTS: Concentrations of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and their glucuronide metabolites were present in maternal plasma and human milk at low concentrations, consistent with previous research in lactating buprenorphine monotherapy participants. Naloxone was not detected, or was detected at concentrations below the limit of quantification, in maternal plasma and in all except one human milk sample at Day 30. Naloxone was not detected or detected at concentrations below the limit of quantification in all infant plasma samples. CONCLUSION: Results support the use of buprenorphine-naloxone by lactating people who meet appropriate criteria for breastfeeding.

Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
1733
Buprenorphine-naloxone, buprenorphine, and methadone throughout pregnancy in maternal opioid use disorder
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. M. Kanervo, S. J. Tupola, E. M. Nikkola, K. M. Rantakari, H. K. Kahila
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
1734
Buprenorphine: new treatment of opioid addiction in primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. Kahan, A. Srivastava, A. Ordean, S. Cirone
Year: 2011
Publication Place: Canada
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review the use of buprenorphine for opioid-addicted patients in primary care. QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: The MEDLINE database was searched for literature on buprenorphine from 1980 to 2009. Controlled trials, meta-analyses, and large observational studies were reviewed. MAIN MESSAGE: Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist that relieves opioid withdrawal symptoms and cravings for 24 hours or longer. Buprenorphine has a much lower risk of overdose than methadone and is preferred for patients at high risk of methadone toxicity, those who might need shorter-term maintenance therapy, and those with limited access to methadone treatment. The initial dose should be given only after the patient is in withdrawal. The therapeutic dose range for most patients is 8 to 16 mg daily. It should be dispensed daily by the pharmacist with gradual introduction of take-home doses. Take-home doses should be introduced more slowly for patients at higher risk of abuse and diversion (eg, injection drug users). Patients who fail buprenorphine treatment should be referred for methadone- or abstinence-based treatment. CONCLUSION: Buprenorphine is an effective treatment of opioid addiction and can be safely prescribed by primary care physicians.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
1736
Buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone maintenance treatment outcomes for opioid analgesic, heroin, and combined users: findings from starting treatment with agonist replacement therapies (START)
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. S. Potter, E. N. Marino, M. P. Hillhouse, S. Nielsen, K. Wiest, C. P. Canamar, J. A. Martin, A. Ang, R. Baker, A. J. Saxon, W. Ling
Year: 2013
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The objective of this secondary analysis was to explore differences in baseline clinical characteristics and opioid replacement therapy treatment outcomes by type (heroin, opioid analgesic [OA], or combined [heroin and OA]) and route (injector or non-injector) of opioid use. METHOD: A total of 1,269 participants (32.2% female) were randomized to receive one of two study medications (methadone or buprenorphine/naloxone [BUP]). Of these, 731 participants completed the 24-week active medication phase. Treatment outcomes were opioid use during the final 30 days of treatment (among treatment completers) and treatment attrition. RESULTS: Non-opioid substance dependence diagnoses and injecting differentiated heroin and combined users from OA users. Non-opioid substance dependence diagnoses and greater heroin use differentiated injectors from non-injectors. Further, injectors were more likely to be using at end of treatment compared with non-injectors. OA users were more likely to complete treatment compared with heroin users and combined users. Non-injectors were more likely than injectors to complete treatment. There were no interactions between type of opioid used or injection status and treatment assignment (methadone or BUP) on either opioid use or treatment attrition. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that substance use severity differentiates heroin users from OA users and injectors from non-injectors. Irrespective of medication, heroin use and injecting are associated with treatment attrition and opioid misuse during treatment. These results have particular clinical interest, as there is no evidence of superiority of BUP over methadone for treating OA users versus heroin users.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1737
Buprenorphine/Naloxone for Opioid Use Disorder Among Alaska Native and American Indian People
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Kate M. Lillie, Jennifer Shaw, Kelley J. Jansen, Michelle M. Garrison
Year: 2021
Publication Place: Baltimore, Maryland
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1738
Buprenorphine/naloxone initiation and referral as a quality improvement intervention for patients who live with opioid use disorder: quantitative evaluation of provincial spread to 107 rural and urban Alberta emergency departments
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. D. Stone, K. Scott, B. R. Holroyd, E. Lang, K. Yee, N. Taghizadeh, J. Deol, K. Dong, J. Fanaeian, M. Ghosh, K. Low, M. Ross, R. Tanguay, P. Faris, N. Day, P. McLane
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1739
Buprenorphine/naloxone treatment in primary care is associated with decreased human immunodeficiency virus risk behaviors
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Lynn E. Sullivan, Brent A. Moore, Marek C. Chawarski, Michael V. Pantalon, Declan Barry, Patrick G. O'Connor, Richard S. Schottenfeld, David A. Fiellin
Year: 2008
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
1740
Buprenorphine/naloxone versus methadone and lofexidine in community stabilisation and detoxification: A randomised controlled trial of low dose short-term opiate-dependent individuals
Type: Journal Article
Authors: F. D. Law, A. M. Diaper, J. K. Melichar, S. Coulton, D. J. Nutt, J. S. Myles
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone and lofexidine are medications with utility in the treatment of opiate withdrawal. We report the first randomised controlled trial to compare the effects of these two medications on withdrawal symptoms and outcome during opiate induction/stabilisation and detoxification. A double-blind randomised controlled trial was conducted in an outpatient satellite clinic of a specialist drug service. Eighty opiate dependent individuals meeting DSM-IV criteria for opiate dependence, using (1/2) g heroin smoked/chased or (1/4) g heroin injected or 30mg methadone, with 3 years of opioid dependency, underwent a short-term opiate treatment programme involving induction/stabilisation on methadone 30mg or buprenorphine/naloxone 4mg/1mg, followed by detoxification (where the methadone group was assisted by lofexidine). The main outcome measures were urine drug screens for opiates and withdrawal and craving questionnaires. There were no overall differences in positive urine drug screens and drop-outs during any phase of the study. During induction/stabilisation, withdrawal symptoms subsided more slowly for buprenorphine/naloxone than for methadone, and craving was significantly higher in the buprenorphine/naloxone group ( p<0.05, 95% confidence interval -3.5, -0.38). During detoxification, withdrawal symptoms were significantly greater and the peak of withdrawal was earlier for the methadone/lofexidine group than the buprenorphine/naloxone group ( p<0.01, 95% confidence interval 3.0, 8.3). Methadone/lofexidine and buprenorphine/naloxone had comparable outcomes during rapid outpatient stabilisation and detoxification in low dose opiate users.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection