Literature Collection
12K+
References
11K+
Articles
1600+
Grey Literature
4800+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.
Providing primary care services in behavioral health settings has become more common and necessary given the needs of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). In this exploratory study, we developed a survey to assess agency and professional staff and practitioner capacity for coordinated care. The survey provides a feedback mechanism for agencies to target staff and organizational needs related to building capacity to provide coordinated care. Logistic regressions compared differences in 24 dimensions of coordinated care specifically comparing capacity based on professional role (behavioral health and medical), model of coordination (co-located and fully integrated), and time of model adoption (early and late adopters). Findings indicated that all three were significant predictors of capacity in multiple dimensions suggesting the need for training and planning around inter-professional and inter-agency coordination.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the organisational and systemic barriers and facilitators to achieving mental health service integration in a region of the State of Victoria, Australia. BACKGROUND: A consensus definition for mental health service integration is lacking, with literature referring to the 'joining up' of mental healthcare and physical healthcare to achieve more holistic care that is focussed on the needs of the consumer. There have been several attempts at integrating mental health services with various healthcare providers, with varying results. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews conducted with key stakeholders were analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework, an implementation science framework designed to identify influences on behaviour relating to the implementation of evidence in healthcare. METHODS: In consultation with a local agency with deep knowledge of mental health service delivery in the region, we recruited stakeholders with extensive experience and knowledge of mental health services; these stakeholders included clinical managers, senior clinicians and leaders of mental health service consumer groups. The interview guide was aligned with the Theoretical Domains Framework. Semi-structured audio-recorded interviews were conducted with stakeholders, and data were analysed according to the Theoretical Domains Framework domains. FINDINGS: From interviews with 16 stakeholders, several barriers to mental health service integration in the region were identified, including workforce capability, funding arrangements and stigma towards some consumers of mental health services. Conversely, several facilitators were identified that could aid in service integration being implemented, including worker and clinician commitment to patient-centred care principles and the ability to provide the right care at the right time. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is good evidence for service integration as an overarching model of mental health service delivery, implementation in some regions has been hampered by extensive barriers. This paper provides recommended strategies to overcome barriers, in addition to facilitators that could be leveraged to achieve mental health service integration.
Pagination
Page 519 Use the links to move to the next, previous, first, or last page.
