Literature Collection

There is global interest in integrated care, often associated with how to improve system efficiency, strengthen clinical and cost-effectiveness, avoid gaps in patient care, and improve patient experiences and outcomes, through improved coordination across services. Despite considerable activity in both delivering and evaluating integrated care, evaluations have not greatly helped to understand how to 'do' it better. Evaluations of integrated care have often arrived at similar conclusions, frequently including the generic finding that results are patchy and context dependent. In this article, we explore and discuss these challenges to evaluation, how these challenges are understood in recent key publications, and suggest an alternative perspective. We explore technical inadequacies of evaluations (concerning definitions, metrics, and timing) as well as deeper problems (such as integrated care being dynamic and relational, and operating across multiple, larger systems). In re-framing how to evaluate integrated care, we propose an approach that involves a recursive evaluation architecture. This draws on systems thinking. This approach also recognises that we can better understand evaluations of integrated care as co-producing knowledge and applying this to learning and adaptation.

Though overall death from opioid overdose are increasing in the United States, the death rate in some states and population groups is stabilizing or even decreasing. Several states have enacted a Naloxone Accessibility Laws to increase naloxone availability as an opioid antidote. The extent to which these laws permit layperson distribution and possession varies. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in provisions of Naloxone Accessibility Laws by states mainly in the Northeast and West regions, and the impact of naloxone availability on the rates of drug overdose deaths.This cross-sectional study was based on the National Vital Statistics System multiple cause-of-death mortality files. The average changes in drug overdose death rates between 2013 and 2017 in relevant states of the Northeast and West regions were compared according to availability of naloxone to laypersons.Seven states in the Northeast region and 10 states in the Western region allowed layperson distribution of naloxone. Layperson possession of naloxone was allowed in 3 states each in the Northeast and the Western regions. The average drug overdose death rates increased in many states in the both regions regardless of legalization of layperson naloxone distribution. The average death rates of 3 states that legalized layperson possession in the West region decreased (-0.33 per 100,000 person); however, in states in the West region that did not allow layperson possession and states in the Northeast region regardless of layperson possession increased between 2013 and 2017.The provision to legalize layperson possession of naloxone was associated with decreased average opioid overdose death rates in 3 states of the West region.

As the aging population in the United States grows, the need for an integrated approach to support older adults has become increasingly urgent. The SUNSHINE framework, Seniors Uniting Nationwide to Support Health, INtegrated Care, and Evolution, offers a model for advancing resilience, defined as the capacity of individuals, families, systems, and communities to adapt and thrive in the face of adversity. SUNSHINE promotes this goal through the alignment of older and aging adults, families, healthcare systems, public health agencies, social services, and community resources. Using the Theory of Change modeling, SUNSHINE emphasizes whole-person health, interdisciplinary collaboration, and the strategic use of technology to address the evolving needs of aging populations. The framework promotes systems integration supported by research infrastructure and multi-sector collaboration to enhance the well-being of older adults and family caregivers. SUNSHINE places a strong emphasis on mental health, particularly depression, and highlights the importance of social connection and prevention in addressing health disparities and care gaps associated with aging. It conceptualizes resilience as both a desired outcome and a driver of transformation, guiding the redesign and evaluation of health and social systems. The framework also identifies opportunities to leverage artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) technologies, grounded in scientific evidence, to support personalized prevention, treatment, and care strategies. These technologies are critical for optimizing decision-making, improving care delivery, and enhancing system flexibility. Finally, SUNSHINE aspires to advance a future of aging that is healthy, resilient, and fair, guided by principles of equity, defined as fairness and impartiality in health opportunities and outcomes.