Literature Collection

PURPOSE: Many current care assessment frameworks prioritise clinical and organisational outcomes over patient perspectives. This study aimed to identify gaps in existing patient-centred assessment methods and to develop a multilevel framework aligning quality evaluation with patient-defined priorities across macro (policy), meso (organisational), and micro (individual) levels, and technological levels. METHODS: We used a primarily qualitative design, conducting a literature review of patient-centred integrated care assessment studies and integrating these findings with a longitudinal case study that examined how the patient's perspectives were documented across multiple health information systems, synthesising evidence on existing practices with insights into how patient perspectives are integrated and represented for a comprehensive understanding. RESULTS: In total, 32 studies were included. The review revealed ongoing misalignment between systemic evaluation practices and patient-defined outcomes, particularly for individuals with complex physical and mental health needs. Minimal patient involvement in developing evaluation criteria reflected a disconnect between policy-level targets and individual patient well-being. This misalignment was echoed in the case study, which underscored that personal goals and non-clinical needs were often unrecorded, highlighting the gap between evaluation metrics and genuinely patient-centred care. CONCLUSION: Integrated care quality assessment remains misaligned with patient-defined outcomes. We propose Patient-Reported Integrated Measures (PRIMs) as a conceptual contribution. PRIMs complement existing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) and Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREM) by capturing multidimensional outcomes that matter to patients and ensuring evaluation aligns with their goals. Integrating PRIMs into health information systems and research agendas can realign care evaluation with evolving patient priorities, thereby reducing the risk of leaving patients behind in future healthcare reforms.

BACKGROUND: Effective person-centred interventions are needed to support people living with mental-physical multimorbidity to achieve better health and wellbeing outcomes. Depression is identified as the most common mental health condition co-occurring with a physical health condition and is the focus of this intervention development study. The aim of this study is to identify the key components needed for an effective intervention based on a clear theoretical foundation, consideration of how motivational interviewing can inform the intervention, clinical guidelines to date, and the insights of primary care nurses. METHODS: A multimethod approach to intervention development involving review and integration of the theoretical principles of Theory of Planned Behavior and the patient-centred clinical skills of motivational interviewing, review of the expert consensus clinical guidelines for multimorbidity, and incorporation of a thematic analysis of group interviews with Australian nurses about their perspectives of what is needed in intervention to support people living with mental-physical multimorbidity. RESULTS: Three mechanisms emerged from the review of theory, guidelines and practitioner perspective; the intervention needs to actively 'engage' patients through the development of a collaborative and empathic relationship, 'focus' on the patient's priorities, and 'empower' people to make behaviour change. CONCLUSION: The outcome of the present study is a fully described primary care intervention for people living with mental-physical multimorbidity, with a particular focus on people living with depression and a physical health condition. It builds on theory, expert consensus guidelines and clinician perspective, and is to be tested in a clinical trial.

Integrated behavioral healthcare has addressed common pediatric primary care concerns including anxiety and depression, but is infrequently applied to somatic symptoms (e.g., chronic pain, fatigue, or syncope unattributable to organic causes), which affect one in three youth. Developing an integrated care model for primary care-where most youth with somatic symptoms first present for evaluation and management-may increase access and positively impact child health. This manuscript summarizes the literature surrounding integrated care for pediatric somatic symptoms and proposes an adapted model for primary care. Drawing from the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health model and cognitive-behavioral protocols for somatic symptom management, we propose that youth with mild to moderate symptoms can be effectively co-managed in primary care by a primary care provider delivering psychoeducation and facilitating team coordination, and an embedded behavioral healthcare provider conducting a brief, targeted intervention. This innovative approach leverages shared clinical responsibilities, as well as youth and families' trust in the primary care setting, to accessibly deliver care for mild-moderate symptoms otherwise unaddressed in current management approaches. Implementation likely requires developing clinician support tools and identifying sustainable billing practices, but may result in accessible, holistic, care that curtails symptom persistence and/or progression.

Autistic youth often experience co-occurring mental health needs, yet they have multi-level barriers to accessing needed care. To address these barriers, the ATTAIN NAV (Access to Tailored Autism Integrated Care through Family Navigation) intervention was co-designed with caregiver and healthcare partners and delivered by lay health navigators to facilitate access to and engagement with mental health services for school-age autistic youth. This manuscript describes the multi-method, partner-engaged, longitudinal adaptation process to (1) identify intervention content and implementation refinements prior to the hybrid trial and (2) track ongoing research, intervention, and implementation adaptations during the trial and their impacts on study outcomes. The adaptation processes used the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (Miller et al., 2021) to guide data collection and evaluation approaches. From the qualitative co-design activities with caregivers (n = 5), primary care providers (n = 6), developmental care clinicians (n = 4), and health informatics staff (n = 3), several intervention content and implementation adaptations were identified and integrated prior to the trial. From the longitudinal adaptation tracking process during the trial, a total of 19 adaptations were documented throughout the implementation trial. The adaptations were related to maintaining the feasibility and acceptability of the study procedures (32%), increasing family recruitment/engagement (26%), increasing the acceptability of the intervention components (16%), increasing physician recruitment/engagement (11%), expanding mental health resources (5%), complying with partnered healthcare organization policy (5%), and increasing navigator workflow efficiency (5%). Findings offer a structured and replicable approach adoptable by non-traditional mental health intervention and implementation research.

Background/Objectives: With the acceleration of population ageing the need for integrated support in healthcare and caregiving is increasing, and the societal demand for improved service quality is also increasing. This study aims to explore how multidisciplinary professionals perceive the implementation of home-visit oral care (HVOC) within the Integrated Community Care in Older Adults model, in order to inform the design of future integrated oral health programs. Methods: The study participants comprised 16 individuals: eight dental hygienists with experience in HVOC and eight multidisciplinary healthcare providers. Focus group interviews were conducted with these participants, and the data were analysed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method to derive key themes and categories. Results: The analysis revealed four main thematic categories: (1) cognitive aspects (understanding of geriatric diseases and families); (2) technical aspects (effective communication and competence in oral care); (3) value-based aspects (empathy, patient-centredness, professional pride); (4) multidisciplinary organisational efforts (establishing interprofessional collaboration systems and integrated platforms). Conclusions: HVOC services provided by dental hygienists were found to promote oral health among older adults. To ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of such services, a customised integrated care model based on multidisciplinary collaboration should be established.

OBJECTIVES: Sleep disorders are wide-ranging in their causes and impacts on other physical and mental health conditions. Thus, sleep disorders could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to assessment and treatment. An integrated care model is often recommended but is costly to implement. We sought to understand how, in the absence of an established organizational structure for integrated sleep care, providers from different clinics work together to provide care for sleep disorders. METHODS: A qualitative case study at one U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. We used a purposeful nested sampling strategy, combining maximum variation sampling and snowball sampling to recruit key staff involved in sleep care. RESULTS: We interviewed providers (N = 10) from sleep medicine, primary care, and mental health services. Providers identified the ubiquity of sleep disorders and a concomitant need for multidisciplinary care. However, they described limited opportunities for multidisciplinary interactions and consequently a negative impact on clinical care. Providers described fragmentation in two areas: among sleep specialists and between sleep specialists and other referring and managing providers. CONCLUSIONS: A range of interventions, based on setting and resources, could improve care coordination both among sleep specialists and between sleep and nonsleep providers. While integrated sleep specialist clinics could reduce care fragmentation, they may not directly impact coordination with referring providers, like primary care and general mental health, who are essential in managing chronic conditions. Future work should continue to explore improving care coordination for sleep problems to ensure patients receive high-quality, timely, patient-centered care.