Literature Collection

PURPOSE: Women’s Mental Health @Obstetrics and Gynecology (WMH @Ob/Gyn) is a novel, insurance-based clinical model integrated in Ob/Gyn practices that offers approachable, acceptable, available, and affordable mental healthcare to women across the lifespan. Women seen by Ob/Gyn physicians for physical healthcare needs are referred to the WMH @Ob/Gyn service based on patient request, provider observation, and/or results on universal depression screening. WMH@Ob/Gyn’ services include mental health screening, psychotherapy, psychopharmacology and support groups, all embedded into Ob/Gyn. Here, we sought to evaluate utilization rates of mental health services as an outcome of increased access resulting from real-world implementation of WMH @Ob/Gyn. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study followed all patients referred to WMH @Ob/Gyn from 02/2020 to 12/2022. Data were obtained from a clinical registry and patient electronic health records. Utilization was estimated on initiation (proportion of women who attended at least one mental health visit), and sustainment (proportion of women who attended three or more visits). RESULTS: 2,661 women were referred to WMH @Ob/Gyn; 65% initiated, out of which 36% sustained treatment. Hispanic/Latina/Spanish women were less likely to initiate treatment. Of those who initiated, women whose insurance was non-participating in mental healthcare, women that were not pregnant, and younger women, had lower odds of sustaining treatment. CONCLUSION: WMH @Ob/Gyn facilitates the initiation and sustainment of mental health treatment at rates considerably higher than those observed in comparable perinatal-integrated programs or the general population. However, persistent systemic barriers, including disparities in physical and mental health insurance coverage, continue to constrain equitable, sustained access to mental healthcare. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00737-025-01652-4.; WMH @Ob/Gyn is an Ob/Gyn integrated mental health service available to women of all ages referred by their Ob/Gyn provider. As a result of increased access to services, 65% of women referred to WMH @Ob/Gyn initiated mental health treatment, and 36% of those sustained. Insurance coverage continues to be a barrier to engaging in sustained mental health services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00737-025-01652-4.; eng

BACKGROUND: Most people with mental disorders, including those with severe and chronic disorders, are treated solely by their general practitioner (GP). Nevertheless, specialised mental health care may be required for specific patients. Notably, the accessibility of mental health specialist care is mainly complicated by (a) long waiting times for an appointment with specialists, (b) long travel distances to specialists, particularly in rural and remote areas, and (c) patients' reservations about mental health specialist care (including fear of being stigmatised by seeking such care). To mitigate those barriers, technology-based integrated care models have been proposed. The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a mental health specialist video consultations model versus treatment as usual in patients with depression or anxiety disorders in primary care. METHODS: In an individually randomised, prospective, two-arm superiority trial with parallel group design, N = 320 patients with anxiety and/or depressive disorder will be recruited in general practices in Germany. The intervention includes a newly developed treatment model based on video consultations with focus on diagnostics, treatment planning, and short-term intervention by mental health specialists. We will systematically compare the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and adverse effects of this new model with usual care by the GP: the primary outcome is the absolute change in the mean depressive and anxiety symptom severity measured on the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS) from baseline to 6 months after baseline assessment. Follow-up in both groups will be conducted by blinded outcome assessors at 6 months and 12 months after baseline. The main analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. We will optimise the likelihood of treatment effectiveness by strict inclusion criteria for patients, enhanced intervention integrity, and conducting a process evaluation. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first confirmatory study on a video-based, integrated care model for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in GP patients in Germany. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, United States National Institutes of Health NCT04316572 . Prospectively registered on 20 March 2020.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to examine the association between mental health staffing at health centers funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and patients' receipt of mental health treatment. METHODS: Data were from the 2014 HRSA-funded Health Center Patient Survey and the 2013 Uniform Data System. Colocation of any mental health staff, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and other licensed staff, was examined. The outcomes of interest were whether a patient received any mental treatment and received any such treatment on site (at the health center). Analyses were conducted with multilevel generalized structural equation logistic regression models for 4,575 patients ages 18-64. RESULTS: Patients attending health centers with at least one mental health full-time equivalent (FTE) per 2,000 patients had a higher predicted probability of receiving mental health treatment (32%) compared with those attending centers with fewer than one such FTE (24%) or no such staffing (22%). Among patients who received this treatment, those at health centers with no staffing had a significantly lower predicted probability of receiving such treatment on site (28%), compared with patients at health centers with fewer than one such FTE (49%) and with at least one such FTE (65%). The predicted probability of receiving such treatment on site was significantly higher if there was a colocated psychiatrist versus no psychiatrist (58% versus 40%). CONCLUSIONS: Colocating mental health staff at health centers increases the probability of patients' access to such treatment on site as well as from off-site providers.