Literature Collection

The opioid epidemic has been an ongoing public health concern in the United States (US) for the last few decades. The number of overdose deaths involving opioids, hereafter referred to as overdose deaths, has increased yearly since the mid-1990s. One treatment modality for opioid use disorder (OUD) is medication-assisted treatment (MAT). As of 2022, only three pharmacotherapy options have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating OUD: buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone. Unlike buprenorphine and naltrexone, methadone dispensing and administrating are restricted to opioid treatment programs (OTPs). To date, Tennessee has no medication units, and administration and dispensing of methadone is limited to licensed OTPs. This review details the research process used to develop a policy draft for medication units in Tennessee. This review is comprised of three parts: (1) a rapid review aimed at identifying obstacles and facilitators to OTP access in the US, (2) a descriptive analysis of Tennessee's geographic availability of OTPs, pharmacies, and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), and (3) policy mapping of 21 US states' OTP regulations. In the rapid review, a total of 486 articles were imported into EndNote from PubMed and Embase. After removing 152 duplicates, 357 articles were screened based on their title and abstract. Thus, 34 articles underwent a full-text review to identify articles that addressed the accessibility of methadone treatment for OUD. A total of 18 articles were identified and analyzed. A descriptive analysis of Tennessee's availability of OTP showed that the state has 22 OTPs. All 22 OTPs were matched to a county and a region based on their address resulting in 15 counties (16%) and all three regions having at least one OTP. A total of 260 FQHCs and 2294 pharmacies are in Tennessee. Each facility was matched to a county based on its address resulting in 70 counties (74%) having at least one FQHC and 94 counties (99%) having at least one pharmacy. As of 31 December 2022, 17 states mentioned medication units in their state-level OTP regulations. Utilizing the regulations for the eleven states with medication units and federal guidelines, a policy draft was created for Tennessee's medication units.

INTRODUCTION: Comprehensiveness in primary care is defined as managing most medical needs in a population while integrating the context of patient's values, preferences, and beliefs. This study aims to synthesise validated measures for measuring comprehensiveness in primary care to facilitate its practical application. AIM: The objective of this study was to synthesise validated measures for measuring comprehensiveness in primary care, facilitating its practical application. METHODS: A narrative-style literature review was employed to conduct a hierarchical review of relevant literature. The process involved several stages: initial term filtering, separation of primary care from specialist care using medical subject heading (MeSH) terms, incorporation of non-MeSH terminology, and a manual review of titles, abstracts, and full articles. Articles were included if they discussed the measurement, assessment, or application of comprehensiveness in primary care and were relevant to primary care and methodologically sound. A multistage PubMed search of 'comprehensiveness' (MeSH) with hierarchical sub-term filtering and snowball method gleaning of additional articles from literature-described terminology was conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Methodological strategies varied from claims-based approaches for cost and utilisation to surveys assessing the scope of clinical services and patient experience. DISCUSSION: Thoroughly measuring comprehensiveness in primary care integrates methods that evaluate the effect of physician ranges of clinical services on the cost and utilisation of health care, and the impact on patient outcomes within the context of the patient experience. Implementing these methods pragmatically can assist communities and health systems in implementing, measuring, and capturing comprehensiveness in primary care.

INTRODUCTION: The extensive and alarming use of opioids for pain management in patients with chronic pain receiving palliative care is associated with non-tolerable gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common adverse effect impairing patient quality of life (QOL). In addition, OIC is one of the treatment limiting consequences of opioid analgesics. Management of OIC is becoming a challenge since traditional laxatives have limited efficiency. Peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORA) have been developed for the treatment of OIC with methylnaltrexone bromide being the first approved to treat OIC in adults with advanced illness undergoing palliative care. Areas covered: The authors systematically review the clinical evidence for methylnaltrexone bromide including a review of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data along with clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Though there is a need for further long-term clinical investigation, there is a large body of evidence for both its efficacy and safety in the treatment of OIC. Expert opinion: Methylnaltrexone has both subcutaneous injection and oral dosage forms available in the market. The lack of more evidence in specific populations such as pregnant women, pediatrics and elderly still remains. The global consumption of methylnaltrexone shows a projection of increased use since its approval worldwide in 2008.