Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
10858 Results
7142
Pharmacists who screen and discuss opioid misuse with patients: Future directions for research and practice
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Gerald Cochran, Craig Field, Kenneth Lawson
Year: 2015
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7143
Pharmacists: On the Front Lines
Type: Government Report
Authors: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Year: 2015
Publication Place: Atlanta, GA
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

7144
Pharmacists' different profiles characterization about opioid substitution treatments
Type: Journal Article
Authors: F. Etcheverrigaray, C. Betaud, F. Feuillet, M. Grall-Bronnec, P. Jolliet, C. Victorri-Vigneau
Year: 2016
Publication Place: France
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
7145
Pharmacists’ nonprescription syringe dispensing perceptions and behaviors: A three-state descriptive analysis
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Nicholas E. Hagemeier, KariLynn Dowling-McClay, Mahnaz Baladezaei, Sabrina J. Curtis, Matthew Spence
Year: 2021
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7146
Pharmacokinetic drug interactions and adverse consequences between psychotropic medications and pharmacotherapy for the treatment of opioid dependence
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. S. Saber-Tehrani, R. D. Bruce, F. L. Altice
Year: 2011
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Psychiatric comorbidities among opioid-dependent patients are common. Many medications used to treat both conditions are metabolized through complimentary cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. When medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence is concurrently used with psychotropic medications, problematic pharmacokinetic drug interactions may occur. METHODS: We reviewed relevant English language articles identified through the MedLine, Scopus, and Embase databases from 1950 to December 2009 using the specific generic names of medications and keywords such as pharmacokinetics and drug interactions with buprenorphine, methadone, and naltrexone. Selected references from these articles were reviewed. Additionally, a review was conducted of abstracts and conference proceedings from national and international meetings from 1990 to 2009. A total of 60 studies were identified and reviewed. RESULTS: Clinical case series and carefully controlled pharmacokinetic interaction studies have been conducted between methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone and some psychoactive medications. Important pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been demonstrated within each class of medications affecting either methadone and buprenorphine or psychoactive drugs. Few studies, however, have been conducted with naltrexone. CONCLUSIONS: Several interactions between methadone, buprenorphine, or naltrexone and psychoactive medications are described and may have important clinical consequences. To optimize care, clinicians must be alerted to these interactions.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7147
Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Once-Weekly and Once-Monthly Buprenorphine Subcutaneous Injection Depots (CAM2038) Versus Intravenous and Sublingual Buprenorphine in Healthy Volunteers Under Naltrexone Blockade: An Open-Label Phase 1 Study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. Albayaty, M. Linden, H. Olsson, M. Johnsson, K. Strandgarden, F. Tiberg
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: INTRODUCTION: CAM2038 q1w (once weekly) and q4w (once monthly) are investigational buprenorphine subcutaneous (SC) formulations based on FluidCrystal((R)) injection depot technology. These two drug products are being developed for opioid dependence treatment, with a target for once-weekly and once-monthly SC dosing. The rationale for developing two products with different dosing frequencies is that treatment strategies/routines, and hence different treatment preferences, can vary between patients, different stages of opioid maintenance treatment, and countries. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine following administration of CAM2038 q1w or q4w versus active controls. METHODS: Healthy volunteers were randomized to five treatment groups. All received a single intravenous dose of buprenorphine 600 microg, followed post-washout by a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 96 mg, a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 192 mg, or sublingual buprenorphine 8, 16, or 24 mg daily for 7 days, followed post-washout by a single dose of CAM2038 q4w 64 or 128 mg or four repeated weekly doses of CAM2038 q1w 16 mg. All subjects received daily naltrexone. RESULTS: Eighty-seven subjects were randomized. Median buprenorphine t max after CAM2038 q4w was 4-10 h (24 h for CAM2038 q1w); mean terminal half-life was 19-25 days (5 days for CAM2038 q1w). CAM2038 q4w showed dose-proportional buprenorphine release, with similar exposure to repeat-dose CAM2038 q1w at comparable monthly dose level. Both CAM2038 formulations showed complete absolute bioavailability of buprenorphine and 5.7- to 7.7-fold greater buprenorphine bioavailability versus sublingual buprenorphine. CAM2038 q1w and q4w were well tolerated; subjects' acceptance was higher for CAM2038 than for sublingual buprenorphine 1 h post-dose. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetic profiles of CAM2038 q1w and q4w versus sublingual buprenorphine support expected treatment efficacy with once-weekly and once-monthly dosing, respectively. CAM2038 formulations were safe and showed good local tolerability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN24987553. FUNDING: Camurus AB.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7148
Pharmacokinetic Interactions between Buprenorphine/Naloxone and Raltegravir in Subjects Receiving Chronic Buprenorphine/Naloxone Treatment
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Douglas Bruce, David E. Moody, Diane Chodkowski, Laurie Andrews, Wenfang B. Fang, Jerdravee Morrison, Theresa L. Parsons, Gerald H. Friedland
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7151
Pharmacologic considerations in treating depression: a patient-centered approach
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. B. Ticknor
Year: 2004
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To review the tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and dually acting antidepressants and their economic and treatment implications. SUMMARY: Major depressive disorder.s cost to the U.S. economy is staggering, but the selection of drugs available to treat it has expanded to include drugs that have better side-effect profiles. Regardless, remission rates are high, and, often, patients are not treated aggressively enough. Somatic presentations are more common than previously thought, and pain, in particular, may be associated with depression. Pain and depression are both regulated by serotonin and norepinephine, and several studies suggest that using dual-action antidepressants may be helpful in patients who have an element of pain to their disorder. Titration to an adequate dose of any antidepressant is important, as is sustaining treatment for months to years, depending on the patient.s history. CONCLUSION: Increasingly, the mental health community is realizing that the goal of treatment for patients with major depressive disorder must be sustained remission.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection
7152
Pharmacologic Guidelines for Treating Individuals with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and Co-Occurring Opioid Use Disorders
Type: Government Report
Authors: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Year: 2012
Publication Place: Rockville, MD
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

7153
Pharmacologic management of bipolar disorder in a medicare advantage population
Type: Journal Article
Authors: H. Huang, J. L. Goren, Y. F. Chan, W. Katon, J. Russo, D. Hogan, J. Unutzer
Year: 2014
Publication Place: England
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
7155
Pharmacological Management of Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnant Women
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. M. Wilder, T. Winhusen
Year: 2015
Publication Place: New Zealand
Abstract: Opioid misuse during pregnancy is associated with negative outcomes for both mother and fetus due not only to the physiological effects of the drug but also to the associated social, medical and mental health problems that accompany illicit drug use. An interdisciplinary approach to the treatment of opioid use disorder during pregnancy is most effective. Ideally, obstetric and substance use treatment are co-located and ancillary support services are readily available. Medication-assisted treatment with methadone or buprenorphine is intrinsic to evidence-based care for the opioid-using pregnant woman. Women who are not stabilized on an opioid maintenance medication experience high rates of relapse and worse outcomes. Methadone has been the mainstay of maintenance treatment for nearly 50 years, but recent research has found that both methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatments significantly improve maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. Although methadone remains the current standard of care, the field is beginning to move towards buprenorphine maintenance as a first-line treatment for pregnant women with opioid use disorder, because of its greater availability and evidence of better neonatal outcomes than methadone. However, there is some evidence that treatment dropout may be greater with buprenorphine relative to methadone.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7156
Pharmacological therapies for management of opium withdrawal
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. Rahimi-Movaghar, J. Gholami, L. Amato, L. Hoseinie, R. Yousefi-Nooraie, M. Amin-Esmaeili
Year: 2018
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pharmacologic therapies for management of heroin withdrawal have been studied and reviewed widely. Opium dependence is generally associated with less severe dependence and milder withdrawal symptoms than heroin. The evidence on withdrawal management of heroin might therefore not be exactly applicable for opium. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of various pharmacologic therapies for the management of the acute phase of opium withdrawal. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following sources up to September 2017: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, regional and national databases (IMEMR, Iranmedex, and IranPsych), main electronic sources of ongoing trials, and reference lists of all relevant papers. In addition, we contacted known investigators to obtain missing data or incomplete trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Controlled clinical trials and randomised controlled trials on pharmacological therapies, compared with no intervention, placebo, other pharmacologic treatments, different doses of the same drug, and psychosocial intervention, to manage acute withdrawal from opium in a maximum duration of 30 days. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included 13 trials involving 1096 participants. No pooled analysis was possible. Studies were carried out in three countries, Iran, India, and Thailand, in outpatient and inpatient settings. The quality of the evidence was generally very low.When the mean of withdrawal symptoms was provided for several days, we mainly focused on day 3. The reason for this was that the highest severity of opium withdrawal is in the second to fourth day.Comparing different pharmacological treatments with each other, clonidine was twice as good as methadone for completion of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.69 to 2.38; 361 participants, 1 study, low-quality evidence). All the other results showed no differences between the considered drugs: baclofen versus clonidine (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.80; 66 participants, 1 study, very low-quality evidence); clonidine versus clonidine plus amantadine (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24; 69 participants, 1 study); clonidine versus buprenorphine in an inpatient setting (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.20; 1 study, 35 participants, very low-quality evidence); methadone versus tramadol (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.37; 1 study, 72 participants, very low-quality evidence); methadone versus methadone plus gabapentin (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.43; 1 study, 40 participants, low-quality evidence), and tincture of opium versus methadone (1 study, 74 participants, low-quality evidence).Comparing different pharmacological treatments with each other, adding amantadine to clonidine decreased withdrawal scores rated at day 3 (mean difference (MD) -3.56, 95% CI -5.97 to -1.15; 1 study, 60 participants, very low-quality evidence). Comparing clonidine with buprenorphine in an inpatient setting, we found no difference in withdrawal symptoms rated by a physician (MD -1.40, 95% CI -2.93 to 0.13; 1 study, 34 participants, very low-quality evidence), and results in favour of buprenorpine when rated by participants (MD -11.80, 95% CI -15.56 to -8.04). Buprenorphine was superior to clonidine in controlling severe withdrawal symptoms in an outpatient setting (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.64; 1 study, 76 participants). We found no difference in the comparison of methadone versus tramadol (MD 0.04, 95% CI -2.68 to 2.76; 1 study, 72 participants) and in the comparison of methadone versus methadone plus gabapentin (MD -2.20, 95% CI -6.72 to 2.32; 1 study, 40 participants).Comparing clonidine versus buprenorphine in an outpatient setting, more adverse effects were reported in the clonidine group (1 study, 76 participants). Higher numbers of participants in the clonidine group experienced hypotension at days 5 to 8, headache at days 1 to 8, sedation at days 5 to 8, dizziness and dry mouth at days 1 to 10, and nausea at days 1 to 9. Sweating was reported in a significantly higher number of participants in the buprenorphine group at days 1 to 10. We found no difference between groups for all the other comparisons considering this outcome.Comparing different dosages of the same pharmacological detoxification treatment, a high dose of clonidine (1 to 1.2 mg/day) did not differ from a low dose of clonidine (0.5 to 0.6 mg/day) in completion of treatment in an inpatient setting (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.19; 1 study, 68 participants), however a higher number of participants with hypotension was reported in the high-dose group (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.77 to 5.98). Gradual reduction of methadone was associated with more adverse effects than abrupt withdrawal of methadone (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.94; 1 study, 20 participants, very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Results did not support using any specific pharmacological approach for the management of opium withdrawal due to generally very low-quality evidence and small or no differences between treatments. However, it seems that opium withdrawal symptoms are significant, especially at days 2 to 4 after discontinuation of opium. All of the assessed medications might be useful in alleviating symptoms. Those who receive clonidine might experience hypotension.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
7157
Pharmacological treatment of psychostimulant use disorders
Type: Book Chapter
Authors: Joy M. Schmitz, Margaret C. Wardle, Michael F. Weaver, Angela M. Heads, Jin H. Yoon, Scott D. Lane
Year: 2019
Publication Place: Washington, DC
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

7158
Pharmacotherapeutic management of co-morbid alcohol and opioid use
Type: Journal Article
Authors: L. E. Hood, J. M. Leyrer-Jackson, M. F. Olive
Year: 2020
Abstract: Opioid use disorder (OUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) are two highly prevalent substance-related disorders worldwide. Co-use of the substances is also quite prevalent, yet there are no pharmacological treatment approaches specifically designed to treat co-morbid OUD and AUD. Here, the authors critically summarize OUD, AUD and opioid/alcohol co-use and their current pharmacotherapies for treatment. They also review the mechanisms of action of opioids and alcohol within the brain reward circuitry and discuss potential combined mechanisms of action and resulting neuroadaptations. Pharmacotherapies that aim to treat AUD or OUD that may be beneficial in the treatment of co-use are also highlighted. Preclinical models assessing alcohol and opioid co-use remain sparse. Lasting neuroadaptations in brain reward circuits caused by co-use of alcohol and opioids remains largely understudied. In order to fully understand the neurobiological underpinnings of alcohol and opioid co-use and develop efficacious pharmacotherapies, the preclinical field must expand its current experimental paradigms of 'single drug' use to encompass polysubstance use. Such studies will provide insights on the neural alterations induced by opioid and alcohol co-use, and may help develop novel pharmacotherapies for individuals with co-occurring alcohol and opioid use disorders.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
7159
Pharmacotherapeutic strategies for methamphetamine use disorder: mind the subgroups
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. Soares, F. C. Pereira
Year: 2019
Publication Place: England
Abstract:

Introduction: Drug use related deaths are increasing and the lack of effective treatment for psychostimulants can be largely held responsible. Particularly, no pharmacotherapy is approved for methamphetamine (METH) use disorder despite decades of research. Only psychosocial interventions are clinically used, with limited long-term recovery and relapse.Areas covered: This review aims to select and describe the most relevant findings to date. Selected clinical trials were found in PubMed using the following keywords ('methamphetamine') and ('addiction' OR 'withdrawal' OR 'treatment' OR 'pharmacotherapy'). Randomized placebo-controlled trials enrolling treatment-seeking METH-dependent subjects and inherent secondary analysis were included.Expert opinion: Overall, end-of-treatment abstinence, reduced METH use or lower relapse rates were seen on METH dependent subgroups or attained significance only following post hoc analysis, irrespective of the medication tested. For example, light and heavy METH users seem to respond differently to pharmacotherapy. This together with the heterogeneous nature of the METH dependent population strongly suggests that some drugs herein described (e.g. mirtazapine, methylphenidate) should be further tested in clinical trials focused on subgroups. Lastly, objective measures, such as urinalysis, are mandatory to include in clinical trials and early treatment response and/or medication compliance should be carefully monitored and considered as predictors of success/failure.

Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection