Literature Collection

Magnifying Glass
Collection Insights

11K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4600+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Enter Search Term(s)
Year
Sort by
Order
Show
11196 Results
6202
Meeting mental health needs after the Gulf oil spill.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Howard J. Osofsky, Joy D. Osofsky, John H. Wells, Carl Weems
Year: 2014
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
6206
Meeting the Mental Health Needs of Older Adults in All Practice Settings
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Tracy Chippendale
Year: 2014
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
6207
Meeting the mental health needs of rural veterans through primary care providers
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Renee Taylor, Michael Glasser, Hana Hinkle, Abigail Miller, Aaron Jannings, Emilee Bocker
Year: 2016
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
6209
Meeting The Opioid Challenge: Getting Naloxone to Those Who Need it Most
Type: Report
Authors: Pooja Lagisetty, Amy Bohnert, Mark Fendrick
Year: 2018
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

6210
Meeting the primary mental health care needs of elderly Chinese people in the UK: a case for specialist provision?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. Foong, B. Walsh, D. Goh, S. Mann
Year: 2000
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
6211
Men and mental health: What are we missing?
Type: Report
Authors: Derek M. Griffith, Ayo Ogunbiyi, Emily Jaeger
Year: 2024
Publication Place: Washington, D.C.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

6212
Men's and women's response to treatment and perceptions of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of injectable opioid assisted treatment for severe opioid use disorder
Type: Journal Article
Authors: H. Palis, K. Marchand, D. Guh, S. Brissette, K. Lock, S. MacDonald, S. Harrison, A. H. Anis, M. Krausz, D. C. Marsh, M. T. Schechter, E. Oviedo-Joekes
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: To test whether there are gender differences in treatment outcomes among patients receiving injectable opioids for the treatment of long-term opioid-dependence. The study additionally explores whether men and women have different perceptions of treatment effectiveness. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis from SALOME, a double-blind, phase III, randomized controlled trial testing the non-inferiorirty of injectable hydromorphone to injectable diacetylmorphine among 202 long-term street opioid injectors in Vancouver (Canada). Given this was a secondary analysis, no a priori power calaculation was conducted. Differences in baseline characteristics and six-month treatment outcomes (illicit heroin use, opioid use, crack cocaine use, non-legal activities, physical and psychological health scores, urine positive for street heroin markers, and retention) were analysed by gender using fitted models. Responses to an open ended question on reasons for treatment effectiveness were explored with a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Men and women differed significantly on a number of characteristics at baseline. For example, women were significantly younger, presented to treatment with significantly higher rates of prior month sex work (31.5% vs. 0%), and used significantly more crack cocaine (14.71 vs. 8.38 days). After six-months of treatment there were no significant differences in treatment outcomes by gender, after adjusting for baseline values. For both men and women, improved health and quality of life were the most common reasons provided for treatment effectiveness, however women were more specific in the types of health improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting to treatment with vulnerabilities not faced to the same extent by men, at six-months women did not differ significantly from men in tested trial efficacy outcomes. While the primary outcome in the trial was the reduction of illicit opioid use, in the open-ended responses both men and women focused their comments on improvement in health and quality of life as reasons for treatment effectiveness. The supervised model of care with injectable medications provides a particularly suitable framework for providing care to opioid-dependent men and women not attracted or retained by other treatments. The absence of statistical differences reported in this secondary analysis may be due to lack of adequate statistical power to detect meaningful effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01447212) Registered: October 4, 2011 at the following link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01447212 .
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
6213
Men's and women's response to treatment and perceptions of outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of injectable opioid assisted treatment for severe opioid use disorder
Type: Journal Article
Authors: H. Palis, K. Marchand, D. Guh, S. Brissette, K. Lock, S. MacDonald, S. Harrison, A. H. Anis, M. Krausz, D. C. Marsh, M. T. Schechter, E. Oviedo-Joekes
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: To test whether there are gender differences in treatment outcomes among patients receiving injectable opioids for the treatment of long-term opioid-dependence. The study additionally explores whether men and women have different perceptions of treatment effectiveness. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis from SALOME, a double-blind, phase III, randomized controlled trial testing the non-inferiorirty of injectable hydromorphone to injectable diacetylmorphine among 202 long-term street opioid injectors in Vancouver (Canada). Given this was a secondary analysis, no a priori power calaculation was conducted. Differences in baseline characteristics and six-month treatment outcomes (illicit heroin use, opioid use, crack cocaine use, non-legal activities, physical and psychological health scores, urine positive for street heroin markers, and retention) were analysed by gender using fitted models. Responses to an open ended question on reasons for treatment effectiveness were explored with a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Men and women differed significantly on a number of characteristics at baseline. For example, women were significantly younger, presented to treatment with significantly higher rates of prior month sex work (31.5% vs. 0%), and used significantly more crack cocaine (14.71 vs. 8.38 days). After six-months of treatment there were no significant differences in treatment outcomes by gender, after adjusting for baseline values. For both men and women, improved health and quality of life were the most common reasons provided for treatment effectiveness, however women were more specific in the types of health improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Despite presenting to treatment with vulnerabilities not faced to the same extent by men, at six-months women did not differ significantly from men in tested trial efficacy outcomes. While the primary outcome in the trial was the reduction of illicit opioid use, in the open-ended responses both men and women focused their comments on improvement in health and quality of life as reasons for treatment effectiveness. The supervised model of care with injectable medications provides a particularly suitable framework for providing care to opioid-dependent men and women not attracted or retained by other treatments. The absence of statistical differences reported in this secondary analysis may be due to lack of adequate statistical power to detect meaningful effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01447212) Registered: October 4, 2011 at the following link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01447212 .
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
6214
Men's Perceptions of a Gender-Tailored eHealth Program Targeting Physical and Mental Health: Qualitative Findings from the SHED-IT Recharge Trial
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. J. Drew, P. J. Morgan, F. Kay-Lambkin, C. E. Collins, R. Callister, B. J. Kelly, V. Hansen, M. D. Young
Year: 2021
Abstract:

Despite increasing rates of co-morbid depression and obesity, few interventions target both conditions simultaneously, particularly in men. The SHED-IT: Recharge trial, conducted in 125 men with depressive symptoms and overweight or obesity, tested the efficacy of a gender-tailored eHealth program with integrated mental health support. The aims of this study were to examine the perceptions of men who received the SHED-IT: Recharge intervention in relation to recruitment, satisfaction with the program, and suggestions to improve the program. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted in a random sub-sample, stratified by baseline depression and weight status (n = 19, mean (SD) age 49.6 years (11.6), PHQ-9 score 9.0 (3.7), BMI 32.5 kg/m(2) (4.6)). Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive process by an independent qualitative researcher. Four themes emerged, namely, (i) specific circumstances determined men's motivation to enroll, (ii) unique opportunity to implement sustained physical and mental health changes compared to previous experiences, (iii) salience of the program elements, and (iv) further opportunities that build accountability could help maintain focus. Gender-tailored, self-directed lifestyle interventions incorporating mental health support are acceptable and satisfying for men experiencing depressive symptoms. These findings provide important insights for future self-guided lifestyle interventions for men with poor physical and mental health.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
6215
Mending Missouri's safety net: Transforming systems of care by integrating primary and behavioral health care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Dorn Schuffman, Benjamin G. Druss, Joseph J. Parks
Year: 2009
Publication Place: US: American Psychiatric Assn
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Key & Foundational See topic collection
6217
Mental and physical comorbid conditions and days in role among persons with arthritis
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Paul E. Stang, Nancy A. Brandenburg, Michael C. Lane, Kathleen R. Merikangas, Michael R. Von Korff, Ronald C. Kessler
Year: 2006
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
6218
Mental disorders among frequent attenders in primary care: a comparison with routine attenders
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. Gili, J. V. Luciano, M. J. Serrano, R. Jimenez, N. Bauza, M. Roca
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Frequent attenders account for a large proportion of primary care (PC) contacts, referrals, and prescriptions. Psychosocial and emotional distress is related to the high use of health services. Few studies have focused on the association between mental disorders assessed using structured interviews and frequent use of PC services.The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with frequent attendance at primary healthcare units, focusing specifically on mental disorders. A two-phase screening epidemiological study comparing frequent attenders and routine attenders in five primary health care units was designed. Three hundred eighteen frequent attenders and 203 patients who attended the same units on a routine basis were compared. Sociodemographic and clinical data were obtained from statistical records and medical charts. Patients with a total score equal or higher than 7 points on the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) were interviewed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. All the scores obtained on the GHQ were statistically different in the two populations. Frequency of mental disorders also differed significantly between both groups, with somatoform and affective disorders being the most prevalent ICD-10 categories among frequent attenders. The presence of depressive disorders and somatoform disorders is the most powerful predictive factor for frequent attendance. High comorbidity was found among frequent attenders with somatoform disorder. Frequent attendance at primary healthcare units is associated with depressive and somatoform disorders. Psychiatric comorbidity could be a confounder, particularly because affective and somatoform disorders often overlap in PC patients.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection
6219
Mental disorders and mental health treatment among U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs outpatients: the Veterans Health Study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. S. Hankin, A Spiro, D. R. Miller, L. Kazis
Year: 1999
Publication Place: UNITED STATES
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the self-reported presence and treatment of current depressive disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and alcohol-related disorder in a group of outpatient veterans. METHOD: Data were obtained from the Veterans Health Study, a longitudinal investigation of male veterans' health. A representative sample of 2,160 outpatients (mean age = 62 years) was drawn from Boston-area U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) outpatient facilities. The participants completed screening measures for depression, PTSD, and alcohol-related disorder. Mental health treatment was assessed by interviews. RESULTS: The screening criteria for at least one current mental disorder were satisfied by 40% (N = 856) of the patients. Screening rates were 31% (N = 676) for depression, 20% (N = 426) for PTSD, and 12% (N = 264) for alcohol-related disorder. Patients who screened positively for current mental disorders were younger, less likely to be married or employed, and more likely to report traumatic exposure than were those without mental disorders. Of those who met the screening criteria for any of the targeted mental disorders, 68% (N = 579) reported receiving mental health treatment. Younger, Caucasian men and those who reported more traumatic exposure were more likely to report receiving mental health treatment than were others who screened positively for mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Screening rates of depression and PTSD and rates of mental health treatment were considerably higher among these VA outpatients than among similar patients in primary care in the private sector. Although the VA is currently meeting the mental health care needs of its patients, future fiscal constraints could affect most adversely the treatment of non-Caucasian and older patients and those with a history of traumatic exposure.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
6220
Mental disorders in primary care in Israel: prevalence and risk factors
Type: Journal Article
Authors: N. Laufer, N. Zilber, P. Jecsmien, B. Maoz, D. Grupper, H. Hermesh, R. Gilad, A. Weizman, H. Munitz
Year: 2013
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric morbidity is common among patients in primary care services and leads to disability and increased use of medical services. Comparison of primary care and community prevalence data is of interest in relation to the health services planning for mental disorders. The aim of the present study was to measure prevalence of mental disorders in six primary care clinics in Israel and to assess risk factors for these disorders. METHOD: Prevalence of mental disorders was measured in a sample of 2,948 primary care consecutive attendees, using two-stage stratified sampling with the General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). RESULTS: A high rate (46.3 %) of current mental disorders was found, with rates of current depressive episode, generalized anxiety disorder, somatization disorder, and neurasthenia being relatively high in comparison with rates in other countries. Low education was a risk factor for all categories of disorders, unemployment a risk factor for depressive disorders, and parenthood was protective for most categories of disorders. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of mental disorders were found in this Israeli primary care sample as compared to other countries, while in the community the rates were midrange as compared to other countries, pointing to a relatively higher use of primary care services by patients with mental disorders in Israel than in other countries.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection