Literature Collection

The importance of integrated care for complex, multiple long term conditions was acknowledged before the COVID pandemic but remained a challenge. The pandemic and consequent development of Long COVID required rapid adaptation of health services to address the population's needs, requiring service redesigns including integrated care. This Delphi consensus study was conducted in the UK and found similar integrated care priorities for Long COVID and complex, multiple long term conditions, provided by 480 patients and health care providers, with an 80% consensus rate. The resultant recommendations were based on more than 1400 responses from survey participants and were supported by patients, health care professionals, and by patient charities. Participants identified the need to allocate resources to: support integrated care, provide access to care and treatments that work, provide diagnostic procedures that support the personalization of treatment in an integrated care environment, and enable structural consultation between primary and specialist care settings including physical and mental health care. Based on the findings we propose a model for delivering integrated care by a multidisciplinary team to people with complex multisystem conditions. These recommendations can inform improvements to integrated care for complex, multiple long term conditions and Long COVID at international level.

OBJECTIVES: The Health and Care Act, 2022 established 42 Integrated Care Systems [ICSs] to oversee strategy, planning, and funding for health and social care within designated areas. Concerns have emerged about the ability of ICS strategy writers to balance national targets with local needs. There is recognition that initial strategies lacked sufficient depth and breadth, necessitating revisions. This paper aims to support ICS strategy writers to meet the requirements of these revisions. STUDY DESIGN: A two-phase, systematic relational content analysis was performed. First phase producing aims for future ICS strategies. The second phase, a thematic analysis, produced guidance on intervention themes. METHODS: The first phase relational content analysis synthesised four foundational documents in the creation of the Health and Care Act, 2022. This allowed a second phase of analysis which aims to offer ICS strategy writers support in the form of a strategy framework. RESULTS: The first phase analysis identified two aims: 1) to provide a sustainably streamlined, collaborated and personalised approach to health and social care access; 2) to be proactive in enabling people to stay healthy from their homes and communities. The second phase of analysis produced four themes to support the creation of a strategy framework, designed to support ICS strategy writers. CONCLUSIONS: This paper identified key national policy drivers and expectations that ICS and Joint Future Planning should consider while preparing their strategies. It highlighted components of effective ICS strategy with the aim of moving towards a personalised, joined up health and care system; the need for data in ensuring evidence-based interventions are prioritised in future ICS/ICB strategy; stronger connection to community and the important role of community led workers; prevention and early detection across the care pathway-delivered through a joined-up approach between clinicians and community-led workers; and addressing wider socio-economic determinants of the communities.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk for adverse outcomes across multiple dimensions. While evidence-based interventions are available, services are often fragmented and difficult to access. We measured the effectiveness of an integrated care van (ICV) that offered services for PWID. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cluster-randomized trial, which took place in Baltimore, MD, USA. Prior to randomization, we used a research van to recruit PWID cohorts from 12 Baltimore neighborhoods (sites), currently served by the city's mobile needle exchange program. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: We randomized sites to receive weekly visits from the ICV (n = 6) or to usual services (n = 6) for 14 months. The ICV offered case management; buprenorphine/naloxone; screening for HIV, hepatitis C virus and sexually transmitted infections; HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis; and wound care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was a composite harm mitigation score that captured access to evidence-based services, risk behaviors and adverse health events (range = 0-15, with higher numbers indicating worse status). We evaluated effectiveness by comparing changes in the composite score at 7 months versus baseline in the two study arms. FINDINGS: We enrolled 720 cohort participants across the study sites (60 per site) between June 2018 and August 2019: 38.3% women, 72.6% black and 85.1% urine drug test positive for fentanyl. Over a median of 10.4 months, the ICV provided services to 734 unique clients (who may or may not have been cohort participants) across the six intervention sites, including HIV/hepatitis C virus testing in 577 (78.6%) and buprenorphine/naloxone initiation in 540 (74%). However, only 52 (7.2%) of cohort participants received services on the ICV. The average composite score decreased at 7 months relative to baseline, with no significant difference in the change between ICV and usual services (difference in differences: -0.31; 95% confidence interval: -0.70, 0.08; P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: This cluster-randomized trial in Baltimore, MD, USA, found no evidence that weekly neighborhood visits from a mobile health van providing injection-drug-focused services improved access to services and outcomes among people who injected drugs in the neighborhood, relative to usual services. The van successfully served large numbers of clients but unexpectedly low use of the van by cohort participants limited the ability to detect meaningful differences.

The authors adapted the established Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) interaction model for use in integrated behavioral health clinics. CARE was modified for delivery in the examination room, during routine primary care visits. Adopting a real-world implementation approach, clinical social workers were trained in the new model-IntegratedCARE-and provided the brief, 3-session treatment to 30 different parent-child dyads. Measurements included the Parental Stress Index-4 Short Form (PSI 4-SF), the Eyberg Childhood Behavior Inventory (ECBI), and the Therapy Attitude Inventory (TAI). There was a statistically significant mean score decrease on the both subscales of the ECBI at pre- and posttreatment. Scores on the TAI indicated that participants were satisfied with the treatment. Attrition rates were somewhat lower than similar studies. Findings indicate the IntegratedCARE model is feasible for sustainable delivery by trained behavioral health professionals in primary care.