Literature Collection

Resources to help improve communication between providers and patients about the risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain, improve the safety and effectiveness of pain treatment, and reduce the risks associated with long-term opioid therapy, including opioid use disorder, overdose, and death.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient detoxification is a common health care entry point for people with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). However, many patients return to opioid use after discharge and also do not access OUD treatment. This systematic review reports on the features and findings of research on interventions developed specifically to improve substance use outcomes and treatment linkage after inpatient detoxification for OUD. METHODS: Of 6419 articles, 64 met inclusion criteria for the current review. Articles were coded on key domains including sample characteristics, study methods and outcome measures, bias indicators, intervention type, and findings. RESULTS: Many studies did not report sample characteristics, including demographics and co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders, which may impact postdetoxification OUD treatment outcomes and the generalizability of interventions. Slightly more than half of studies examined interventions that were primarily medical in nature, though only a third focused on initiating medication treatment beyond detoxification. Medical and combination interventions that focused on initiating medications for OUD generally performed well, as did psychological interventions with one or more reinforcement-based components. CONCLUSIONS: Research efforts to improve post-detoxification outcomes would benefit from clearer reporting of sample characteristics that are associated with treatment and recovery outcomes, including diagnostic comorbidities. Findings also support the need to identify ways to introduce medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and other effective treatments including reinforcement-based interventions during detoxification or soon after.

There is substantial evidence that community health worker (CHW) interventions can lead to improved health outcomes. However, their integration into specialty care teams-particularly within epilepsy care-is still limited. Embedding CHWs onto epilepsy center teams presents a promising opportunity to address health inequities by incorporating whole-person patient centered care and addressing social determinants of health (SDOH). The conceptual model introduced in this manuscript highlights the importance of collaboration between epilepsy centers, medical centers, health systems, community partners and nontraditional CHW professional workforce to drive systemic change. We share a process model that supports the pragmatic integration of CHWs onto epilepsy care teams and the implementation of standardized SDOH screening taking into account existing multidisciplinary professional roles and common epilepsy center frameworks for delivering care.

: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many addiction treatment and harm reduction organizations have had to reduce their hours and services for people with substance use disorders, placing these individuals at increased risk of death. In order to address restricted treatment access during COVID-19, guidance from the Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration, the US Drug Enforcement Administration, and the US Department of Health and Human Services has allowed for use of audio-only telehealth encounters for buprenorphine induction without requiring an in-person evaluation or video interface. This has enabled innovations in order to try to meet the needs of the most vulnerable among us during the current pandemic. In this new regulatory environment, we established the Rhode Island Buprenorphine Hotline, a phone hotline which functions as a "tele-bridge" clinic where people with moderate to severe opioid use disorder can be linked with a DATA 2000 waivered provider who can provide an initial assessment and, if appropriate, prescribe buprenorphine for unobserved induction and linkage to outpatient treatment. In this correspondence we briefly share our experience developing this common sense approach to addressing the complex problem of access to treatment only now permissible due to regulatory changes during COVID-19.

Optimizing the overall health of individuals prior to pregnancy can improve both pregnancy and lifelong health outcomes. Despite extremely high financial expenditure on birth in the United States, maternal and infant mortality rates continue to rise. Moreover, significant racial and ethnic disparities persist in perinatal health outcomes. Preconception care, or health care provided before or between pregnancies, has the capacity to meet these challenges. Preconception care can be integrated into every health care visit, including visits with primary care, reproductive health, and mental health care clinicians. Increasing awareness among clinicians of the benefits of preconception care and equipping them with innovative strategies to implement this care into practice, the number of people receiving optimal care could be increased. Recent innovations in preconception care include group care, health applications (apps), reminders in electronic health records, social marketing campaigns, social media movements, community-based partnerships, health care policy and access, and improving public and clinician education on preconception health topics. Ultimately, improving preconception health is best done in partnership between the consumer and clinician. Midwives, whose care is person-centered and partnership-focused, are well positioned to champion the innovation and implementation of equitable preconception care. The purpose of this State of the Science review, therefore, is to synthesize the literature on recent evidence-based innovations that may be used to improve preconception health and counseling.

People who have behavioral health disorders are disproportionately represented among people with HIV and those likely to be diagnosed with HIV. Despite repeated calls for the past decade for the integration of behavioral health into the HIV Care Continuum, findings from priority jurisdictions show these efforts lag. We present 5 examples of efforts to integrate behavioral health services into the HIV Care Continuum, across regions and populations in Ending the HIV Epidemic priority regions. Across diverse settings, care provision-screening, assessment, referrals, and treatments-remains insufficient. Consistent, ongoing actions are needed to address the compounded consequences of the HIV and behavioral health synergistic epidemics, or syndemic. The studies in this article involved local communities, provider groups, and people with lived experience of trauma, serious mental illness, neuropsychological disorder, substance use disorder, and HIV. These example studies reveal significant unmet needs for behavioral health care and/or HIV prevention and treatment in these priority communities. A common finding among these examples was that the success of interventions hinges on the extent to which interventions are tailored to local contexts and the specific needs of historically underserved populations, including Black women, the socioeconomically disadvantaged, LGBTQIA+ individuals, and people with serious mental illness and/or substance use disorders. We suggest recommendations for how Ending the HIV Epidemic efforts can be optimized to adapt and implement integrated HIV and behavioral health care to advance national goals.