Literature Collection

Magnifying Glass
Collection Insights

12K+

References

11K+

Articles

1600+

Grey Literature

4800+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Enter Search Term(s)
Year
Sort by
Order
Show
13017 Results
5381
IAPT, anxiety and envy: A psychoanalytic view of NHS primary care mental health services today
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Rosemary Rizq
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
5382
Iatrogenic Opioid Withdrawal in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Assessment Tools and Management
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. W. Chiu, S. Contreras, S. Mehta, J. Korman, M. M. Perreault, D. R. Williamson, L. D. Burry
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To (1) provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and risk factors of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients and (2) conduct a literature review of assessment and management of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (1946-June 2017), EMBASE (1974-June 2017), and CINAHL (1982-June 2017) with the terms opioid withdrawal, opioid, opiate, critical care, critically ill, assessment tool, scale, taper, weaning, and management. Reference list of identified literature was searched for additional references as well as www.clinicaltrials.gov . STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We restricted articles to those in English and dealing with humans. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 2 validated pediatric critically ill opioid withdrawal assessment tools: (1) Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 (WAT-1) and (2) Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms Scale (SOS). Neither tool differentiated between opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal. WAT-1 was evaluated in critically ill adults but not found to be valid. No other adult tool was identified. For management, we identified 5 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective studies, and 2 systematic reviews. Most studies were small and only 2 studies utilized a validated assessment tool. Enteral methadone, alpha-2 agonists, and protocolized weaning were studied. CONCLUSION: We identified 2 validated assessment tools for pediatric intensive care unit patients; no valid tool for adults. Management strategies tested in small trials included methadone, alpha-2 agonists, and protocolized sedation/weaning. We challenge researchers to create validated tools assessing specifically for opioid withdrawal in critically ill children and adults to direct management.
Topic(s):
Measures See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
5385
ICD-10 telepsychiatry education in Western Australia: Bridging the distance.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Jonathan Laugharne, Aleksandar Janca
Year: 2007
Publication Place: US United Kingdom
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
5386
Icelandic prevention model in rural Appalachian communities: Gauging stakeholder experience with the core processes three years into county-level implementation
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Stephen M. Davis, Kelly Rossetto, Megan L. Smith, Michael J. Mann, Jessica Coffman, Alfgeir L. Kristjansson
Year: 2025
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
5387
ICSI's Palliative Care Strategic Initiative
Type: Report
Authors: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
Year: 2012
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

5388
Identification and Management of Adolescent Depression in a Large Pediatric Care Network
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. M. Farley, R. J. Gallop, E. S. Brooks, M. Gerdes, M. L. Bush, J. F. Young
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Primary care has been promoted as a setting to identify and manage adolescent depression. This study examined primary care-based adolescent depression identification and follow-up care when elevated symptoms were identified. METHODS: Data came from a large pediatric care network with an organizational recommendation to screen for depression at age 16 well-visits using an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated standardized measure. Analyses examined rates of screening and elevated symptoms, pediatricians' initial responses to elevated scores, and types of follow-up care received over 1 year using retrospective EHR data extraction and manual chart reviews. RESULTS: Across program sites, 76.3% (n = 6981) of patients attending their age 16 well-visits were screened. About one-quarter had an elevated score (6.7% mild and 19.2% moderate-to-severe), many of whom received active follow-up on their well-visit date. Over 1 year, three-fourths of patients with scores in the moderate-to-severe range and 40.0% of patients with scores in the mild range received follow-up care (e.g., antidepressant prescriptions) as per EHR extraction. Follow-up rates were higher as per manual chart reviews. CONCLUSION: Routine adolescent depression screening is feasible across diverse primary care sites. Most patients with elevated scores were not already receiving behavioral health services, suggesting screening identified previously undetected concerns. In turn, many adolescents with elevated scores initiated treatment after screening, which indicates providing screen results at the point of care may facilitate pediatrician actions. Still, gaps in follow-up care demonstrate the need for greater investment in primary care-based behavioral health services to support high-quality treatment and ultimately decrease the burden of adolescent depression.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
5389
Identification and Management of Adolescent Depression in a Large Pediatric Care Network
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. M. Farley, R. J. Gallop, E. S. Brooks, M. Gerdes, M. L. Bush, J. F. Young
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Primary care has been promoted as a setting to identify and manage adolescent depression. This study examined primary care-based adolescent depression identification and follow-up care when elevated symptoms were identified. METHODS: Data came from a large pediatric care network with an organizational recommendation to screen for depression at age 16 well-visits using an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated standardized measure. Analyses examined rates of screening and elevated symptoms, pediatricians' initial responses to elevated scores, and types of follow-up care received over 1 year using retrospective EHR data extraction and manual chart reviews. RESULTS: Across program sites, 76.3% (n = 6981) of patients attending their age 16 well-visits were screened. About one-quarter had an elevated score (6.7% mild and 19.2% moderate-to-severe), many of whom received active follow-up on their well-visit date. Over 1 year, three-fourths of patients with scores in the moderate-to-severe range and 40.0% of patients with scores in the mild range received follow-up care (e.g., antidepressant prescriptions) as per EHR extraction. Follow-up rates were higher as per manual chart reviews. CONCLUSION: Routine adolescent depression screening is feasible across diverse primary care sites. Most patients with elevated scores were not already receiving behavioral health services, suggesting screening identified previously undetected concerns. In turn, many adolescents with elevated scores initiated treatment after screening, which indicates providing screen results at the point of care may facilitate pediatrician actions. Still, gaps in follow-up care demonstrate the need for greater investment in primary care-based behavioral health services to support high-quality treatment and ultimately decrease the burden of adolescent depression.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
5390
Identification and Management of Behavioral/Mental Health Problems in Primary Care Pediatrics: Perceived Strengths, Challenges, and New Delivery Models
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. W. Davis, S. M. Honaker, V. F. Jones, P. G. Williams, F. Stocker, E. Martin
Year: 2012
Abstract: This study describes the experiences of and barriers for pediatricians in Kentucky in providing behavioral/mental health (B-MH) services in primary care settings. These data will serve as a foundation for improving service delivery. An online survey was completed by 70 pediatricians. Descriptive data are presented. More than 90% of the respondents said that they saw at least one patient a month with 1 of 10 specific B-MH diagnoses. Physicians' comfort with diagnosing and treating disorders varied widely by diagnosis, age-group, and drug classification. Major barriers to providing optimal care were inaccessibility of mental health professionals for consultation and referral, lack of communication, and lack of knowledge. Respondents were more likely to favor consultation and co-location models over an integration model of care delivery. Overall, the authors found that pediatricians are dealing with patients with B-MH problems for which they may not have been adequately trained. Communication and collaboration needs were identified.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
5391
Identification and management of depression in Australian primary care and access to specialist mental health care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: N. Glozier, T. Davenport, I. B. Hickie
Year: 2012
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The authors evaluated management of illness, including access to specialist mental health care, among people identified by general practitioners as clinically depressed. METHODS: Australian primary care practitioners recruited in 2009 completed case reports and collected self-report assessments from five to seven consecutively presenting patients whom they identified as having clinical depression. RESULTS: Among 735 patients with clinical depression, 55% met criteria for major depressive syndrome, 86% reported clinically significant sleep disturbance, and 47% had been depressed for more than 12 months. Most (77%) were prescribed antidepressants, and 30% were prescribed anxiolytics or hypnotics. Patients under shared care with specialist mental health care providers (42%) had more severe, chronic, and recurrent conditions but no demographic advantages. CONCLUSIONS: Depressed patients of general practitioners often had chronic, recurrent, and moderately to severely disabling conditions, but fewer than half received specialist care. Access to specialist care, however, appeared to be based on clinical need, with little inequity in sociodemographic characteristics observed.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
5393
Identification and Management of Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care: an Update
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. H. Donroe, E. P. Bhatraju, J. I. Tsui, E. J. Edelman
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract:

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The rising prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and related complications in North America coupled with limited numbers of specialists in addiction medicine has led to large gaps in treatment. Primary care providers (PCPs) are ideally suited to diagnose and care for people with OUD and are increasingly being called upon to improve access to care. This review will highlight the recent literature pertaining to the care of patients with OUD by PCPs. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of patients with OUD in primary care practice is increasing, and models of office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) are evolving to meet local needs of both ambulatory practices and patients. OBOT has been shown to increase access to care and demonstrates comparable outcomes when compared to more specialty-driven care. OBOT is an effective means of increasing access to care for patients with OUD. The ideal structure of OBOT depends on local factors. Future research must explore ways to increase the identification and diagnosis of patients with OUD, improve treatment retention rates, reduce stigma, and promote interdisciplinary approaches to care.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
5394
Identification and management of pain medication abuse and misuse: Current state and future directions
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Craig T. Hartrick, Robert J. Gatchel, Sean Conroy
Year: 2012
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
5395
Identification and treatment of depression in minority populations
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. A. DeJesus, V. A. Diaz, W. C. Gonsalves, P. J. Carek
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Depression is a common condition, representing close to 6% of visits to primary care providers. Although minorities are more likely to have chronic depression, they are more likely to be incorrectly diagnosed and less likely to receive treatment when compared to the mainstream population. Screening and appropriate treatment within primary care is recommended in clinical practices that have systems in place to assure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and follow-up. This recommendation is especially relevant for treatment of minority populations, as they are more likely to seek care for mental health problems from primary care providers rather than specialists. A number of self-report screening tools that simplify screening are available. Treatment modalities that are supported by evidence are psychotherapy, prescription medications, and electroconvulsive therapy for severe depression. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have become the cornerstone of therapy for depression since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of fluoxetine in 1987. No substantial differences in efficacy of SSRIs have been found, although data suggest differences with respect to onset of action and adverse effects that may be relevant in the choice of one medicine over another. Common side effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors include nausea, diarrhea, insomnia, somnolence and dizziness, akathisia, and sexual dysfunction. While most of these symptoms tend to subside within several weeks of use, sexual dysfunction appears to be a long-term side effect that typically reverses within a few days after discontinuation of the causative medication. Selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), bupropion, mirtazapine, and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are other commonly used medications. Complementary and alternative treatments, such as St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), exercise, acupuncture, music therapy, and relaxation, have limited data supporting their efficacy.
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
5396
Identification of and guidance for problem drinking by general medical providers: Results from a national survey
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Elizabeth J. D'Amico, Susan M. Paddock, Audrey Burnam, Fuan-Yue Kung
Year: 2005
Publication Place: US: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
5397
Identification of developmental-behavioral problems in primary care: a systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. C. Sheldrick, S. Merchant, E. C. Perrin
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: CONTEXT: Recent mandates and recommendations for formal screening programs are based on the claim that pediatric care providers underidentify children with developmental-behavioral disorders, yet the research to support this claim has not been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE: To review research literature for studies regarding pediatric primary care providers' identification of developmental-behavioral problems in children. METHODS: On the basis of a Medline search conducted on September 22, 2010, using relevant key words, we identified 539 articles for review. We included studies that (1) were conducted in the United States, (2) were published in peer-reviewed journals, (3) included data that addressed pediatric care providers' identification of developmental-behavioral problems in individual patients, (4) included an independent assessment of patients' developmental-behavioral problems, such as diagnostic interviews or validated screening instruments, and (5) reported data sufficient to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Studies were not limited by sample size. Eleven articles met these criteria. We used Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria to evaluate study quality. Although the studies were similar in many ways, heterogeneous methodology precluded a meta-analysis. RESULTS: Sensitivities for pediatric care providers ranged from 14% to 54%, and specificities ranged from 69% to 100%. The authors of 1 outlier study reported a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 61%. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians are often the first point of entry into developmental and mental health systems. Knowing their accuracy in identifying children with developmental-behavioral disabilities is essential for implementing optimal evaluation programs and achieving timely identification. Moreover, these statistics are important to consider when planning large-scale screening programs.
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
5398
Identification of Patterns of Hospitalizations in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service
Type: Journal Article
Authors: S. Urben, P. Golay, A. Forte, S. Courousse, C. Kapp, K. J. Plessen, M. Armando
Year: 2025
Abstract:

Adolescence is a time of increased vulnerability to mental health conditions, which may necessitate hospitalization. This study sought to identify and characterize patterns of adolescent (re-)hospitalizations. The one-year (re-)hospitalization patterns of 233 adolescents were analyzed. The sequences of hospitalization and discharge was examined using cluster analyses. Results revealed five distinct (re-)hospitalization patterns or clusters: Cluster A represented brief hospitalizations with 56 cases (24.03%) averaging 7.71 days; cluster B consisted of repetitive short hospitalizations involving 97 cases (41.63%) with an average of 19.90 days; cluster C encompassed repetitive medium hospitalizations included 66 cases (28.33%) averaging 41.33 days; cluster D included long hospitalizations with 11 cases (4.72%) and an average of 99.36 days; cluster E depicted chronic hospitalizations, accounting for 3 cases (1.29%) with an average stay of 138.67 days. Despite no age-based differences across clusters, distinctions were noted in terms of sex, diagnoses, and severity of clinical and psychosocial difficulties. The study identified characteristics of both regular and atypical adolescent hospitalization users, emphasizing the distribution of hospitalization days and their associated clinical attributes. Such insights are pivotal for enhancing the organization of child and adolescent mental health services to cater to the growing care requirements of this age group.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
5399
Identification of somatic and anxiety symptoms which contribute to the detection of depression in primary health care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. Barkow, R. Heun, T. B. Ustun, M. Berger, I. Bermejo, W. Gaebel, M. Harter, F. Schneider, R. D. Stieglitz, W. Maier
Year: 2004
Publication Place: France
Abstract: Somatic symptoms and anxiety symptoms are often disregarded in the detection of depression in primary care. The present investigation examined to what extent somatic and anxiety symptoms recorded with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Primary Health Care Version (CIDI-PHC) can improve the detection of depression as compared to the General Health Questionnaire-12-item version alone. Data from the World Health Organization study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care were used. The study sample consisted of primary care attenders from 15 centres from all over the world who underwent a psychiatric examination with the CIDI-PHC. Medically unexplained somatic symptoms (back pain, feelings of heaviness/lightness in parts of the body, periods of bodily weakness, seizures/convulsions, permanent tiredness, exhaustion after a minimum of effort) and-to a smaller extent-diverse anxiety symptoms (e.g. feelings of anxiousness/nervousness, feelings of tension, difficulties relaxing) significantly contributed to the detection of depression in a logistic regression analysis. The results confirm the observation that in primary care somatic symptoms play an important role in the manifestation of depressive disorders. The items investigated herein could prove beneficial for future depression screening instruments to improve the detection of depressive disorders in primary care.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection
5400
Identifiers, or "red flags," of complexity and need for integrated care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: F. J. Huyse, F. C. Stiefel, P. de Jonge
Year: 2006
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Because complex medical patients are a subgroup of the medical population and because complexity assessment involves extra effort, preselection of these patients through identifiers is necessary. There is no best identifier for complexity, and the one most suitable for the population served should be selected. This article provides a table with potential identifiers and discusses the difference between disease-oriented screening and treatment and a more generic approach such as complexity screening and complexity management.
Topic(s):
Medically Unexplained Symptoms See topic collection