Email UpdatesLiterature Collection
Collection Insights
11K+
References
9K+
Articles
1400+
Grey Literature
4600+
Opioids & SU
The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More
Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).
11231 Results
2946
Developing a Competent Workforce for Integrated Health and Social Care: What Does It Take?
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2016
Publication Place: England
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
Reference Links: 
View the DOI record for Developing a Competent Workforce for Integrated Health and Social Care: What Does It Take?
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Developing a Competent Workforce for Integrated Health and Social Care: What Does It Take?2947
Developing a Computer Application to Prepare Social Workers for Integrated Health Care: Integrated Healthcare (Version 1.0)
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2018
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: Integrated health care (IHC) is a proposed change to the U.S. health care system to address health care disparities for individuals with mental and physical health conditions. Computer applications may provide an effective strategy to prepare social workers for the transition to IHC. An Internet-based tool, Integrated Healthcare (Version 1.0) was developed and tested through rapid prototyping to access knowledge required for behavioral health providers to practice in IHC settings. Two focus groups (N = 5, N = 7) and individual interviews (N = 5) were conducted with social work professors and students. Nielsen's usability heuristics were used to evaluate data from focus groups and interviews, and changes were incorporated in development. The final computer application is an introduction to IHC concepts, reinforces the integrated nature of physical and behavioral health, and puts evidence-based knowledge at the point of care.
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth
See topic collection
2948
Developing a framework of care for opioid medication misuse in community pharmacy
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2016
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Opioids & Substance Use
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Developing a framework of care for opioid medication misuse in community pharmacy
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Developing a framework of care for opioid medication misuse in community pharmacy2949
Developing a Framework of Integrated Competencies for Adaptive Expertise in Integrated Physical and Mental Health Care
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2020
Publication Place: United States
Abstract:
Phenomenon: Despite the emergence of the integrated care (IC) model, IC is variably taught and is challenged by current siloed competency domains. This study aimed to define IC competencies spanning multiple competency domains. Approach: Iterative facilitated discussions were conducted at a half-day education retreat with 25 key informants including clinician educators and education scientists. Seven one-on-one semistructured interviews were subsequently conducted with different interprofessional providers in IC settings within a Canadian context. Data collection grounded in patient cases with a physical illness and concurrent mental illness (medical psychiatry) were used to elicit identification of complex patient needs and the key medical psychiatry knowledge and skills required to address these needs. A thematic analysis of transcripts was performed using constant comparison to iteratively identify themes. Findings: Participants described 4 broad competency domains necessary for expertise in IC: (a) extensive integrated knowledge of biopsychosocial aspects of disease, systems of care, and social determinants of care; (b) skills to establish a longitudinal alliance with the patient and functional relationships with colleagues; (c) constructing a comprehensive understanding of individual patients' complex needs and how these can be met within their health and social systems; and (d) the ability to effectively meet the patient's needs using IC models. These 4 domains were linked by an overarching philosophy of care encompassing key enabling attitudes such as proactively pursuing depth to understand patient and system complexity while maintaining a patient-centered approach. Insights: The study addresses how development of IC expertise can be fostered by integration of individual IC competency domains. The findings align with previous research suggesting that competencies from existing frameworks are being enacted jointly in expert capabilities to meet the complex needs of patients, in this case with comorbid physical and mental health concerns.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce
See topic collection
, Healthcare Disparities
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Developing a Framework of Integrated Competencies for Adaptive Expertise in Integrated Physical and Mental Health Care
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Developing a Framework of Integrated Competencies for Adaptive Expertise in Integrated Physical and Mental Health Care2950
Developing a measure of provider adherence to improve the implementation of behavioral health services in primary care: a Delphi study
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2013
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The integration of behavioral health services into primary care is increasingly popular, yet fidelity of implementation in this area has been infrequently assessed due to the few measurement tools available. A sentinel indicator of fidelity of implementation is provider adherence, or utilization of prescribed procedures and engagement in model-specific behaviors. This study aimed to develop the first self-report measure of behavioral health provider adherence for co-located, collaborative care, a commonly adopted model of behavioral health service delivery in primary care. METHODS: A preliminary 56-item measure was developed by the research team to represent critical components of adherence among behavioral health providers. To ensure the content validity of the measure, a modified Delphi study was conducted using a panel of co-located, collaborative care model experts. During three rounds of emailed surveys, panel members provided qualitative feedback regarding item content while rating each item's relevance for behavioral health provider practice. Items with consensus ratings of 80% or greater were included in the final adherence measure. RESULTS: The panel consisted of 25 experts representing the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, and academic and community health centers (total study response rate of 76%). During the Delphi process, two new items were added to the measure, four items were eliminated, and a high level of consensus was achieved on the remaining 54 items. Experts identified 38 items essential for model adherence, six items compatible (although not essential) for model adherence, and 10 items that represented prohibited behaviors. Item content addressed several domains, but primarily focused on behaviors related to employing a time-limited, brief treatment model, the scope of patient concerns addressed, and interventions used by providers. CONCLUSIONS: This study yielded the first content valid self-report measure of critical components of collaborative care adherence for use by behavioral health providers in primary care. Although additional psychometric evaluation is necessary, this measure may assist implementation researchers in clarifying how provider behaviors contribute to clinical outcomes. This measure may also assist clinical stakeholders in monitoring implementation and identifying ways to support frontline providers in delivering high quality services.
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational
See topic collection
, Measures
See topic collection
2951
Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-based Research Network (SNW-PBRN)
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2011
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: In 2001, community health center (CHC) leaders in Oregon established an organization to facilitate the integration of health information technology, including a shared electronic health record (EHR), into safety net clinics. The Oregon Community Health Information Network (shortened to OCHIN as other states joined) became a CHC information technology hub, supporting a network-wide EHR with one master patient index, now linked across >40 safety net organizations serving >900,000 patients with nearly 800,000 distinct CHC visits. Recognizing the potential of OCHIN's multiclinic network and comprehensive EHR database for conducting safety net-based research, OCHIN leaders and local researchers formed the Safety Net West practice-based research network (PBRN). The Safety Net West "community- based laboratory," based at OCHIN, is positioned to become an important resource for many studies including: evaluation of the real-time impact of health care reform on uninsured populations; development of new models of primary care delivery; dissemination and translation of interventions from other EHR-based systems (e.g., Kaiser Permanente) into the community health setting; and analyses of factors influencing disparities in health and health care access. We describe the founding of Safety Net West, its infrastructure development, current projects, and the future goals of this community-based PBRN with a common EHR.
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth
See topic collection
2956
Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2006
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the views of stakeholders including patients, general practitioners (GPs) and mental health workers on the feasibility, acceptability and barriers to a collaborative care model for treatment of depression within the context of U.K. primary health care. METHOD: We used semistructured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of 11 patients and 38 professionals from a wide selection of primary and secondary care mental health services, as well as framework analysis using a "constant comparative" approach to identify key concepts and themes. RESULTS: Regular contact for patients with depression is acceptable and valued by both patients and professionals. However, patients value support, whereas professionals focus on information. To be acceptable to patients, contacts about medication or psychosocial support must minimize the potential for patient disempowerment. The use of the telephone is convenient and lends anonymity, but established mental health workers think it will impair their judgments. While patients merely identified the need for skilled case managers, GPs preferred established professionals; however, these workers did not see themselves in this role. All involved were cautious about deploying new workers. Additional barriers included practical and organizational issues. CONCLUSIONS: Although a telephone-delivered mix of medication support and low-intensity psychological intervention is generally acceptable, significant issues to be addressed include the values of the current mental health workforce, fears about new workers' experience and competence, the balance of face-to-face and telephone contacts and case manager education in nonspecific skills necessary to develop a therapeutic alliance, as well as the knowledge and skills required for education, medication support and behavioral activation. Qualitative research can add value to careful modeling of collaborative care prior to international implementation.
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth
See topic collection
Reference Links:
View the DOI record for Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study
View DOI Record
View the PubMed citation for Developing a U.K. protocol for collaborative care: a qualitative study2957
Developing an evaluation framework for consumer-centred collaborative care of depression using input from stakeholders
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2013
Publication Place: Canada
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop a framework for research and evaluation of collaborative mental health care for depression, which includes attributes or domains of care that are important to consumers. METHODS: A literature review on collaborative mental health care for depression was completed and used to guide discussion at an interactive workshop with pan-Canadian participants comprising people treated for depression with collaborative mental health care, as well as their family members; primary care and mental health practitioners; decision makers; and researchers. Thematic analysis of qualitative data from the workshop identified key attributes of collaborative care that are important to consumers and family members, as well as factors that may contribute to improved consumer experiences. RESULTS: The workshop identified an overarching theme of partnership between consumers and practitioners involved in collaborative care. Eight attributes of collaborative care were considered to be essential or very important to consumers and family members: respectfulness; involvement of consumers in treatment decisions; accessibility; provision of information; coordination; whole-person care; responsiveness to changing needs; and comprehensiveness. Three inter-related groups of factors may affect the consumer experience of collaborative care, namely, organizational aspects of care; consumer characteristics and personal resources; and community resources. CONCLUSION: A preliminary evaluation framework was developed and is presented here to guide further evaluation and research on consumer-centred collaborative mental health care for depression.
Topic(s):
General Literature
See topic collection