Literature Collection

Magnifying Glass
Collection Insights

12K+

References

11K+

Articles

1600+

Grey Literature

4800+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 11,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Enter Search Term(s)
Year
Sort by
Order
Show
12774 Results
10641
Suicide risk remission in collaborative care: a large-scale observational study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: C. Hardy, V. Little, B. Green
Year: 2025
Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: Primary care settings represent a critical opportunity for suicide prevention, as many individuals who die by suicide visit primary care providers in their final month of life. The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) offers a structured approach to behavioral health treatment in primary care, but research on its effectiveness for suicide risk management is limited. This study examined how clinical variables (days enrolled, clinical touchpoints, psychiatric consultations) relate to suicide risk outcomes in CoCM, and how these relationships are moderated by initial depression severity. METHODS: Data from 3,599 patients with suicide risk flags who completed CoCM treatment were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. Changes in suicide risk level from intake to discharge were categorized as improved, unchanged, or regressed. RESULTS: Longer enrollment (OR=1.432, p<.001) and more clinical touchpoints (OR=2.584, p<.001) predicted improved outcomes. Higher baseline depression scores predicted poorer outcomes (OR=0.741, p<.001) but showed significant interaction with days enrolled. More psychiatric consultations (OR=0.813, p<.001) were associated with risk regression, likely reflecting appropriate escalation of complex cases. DISCUSSION: CoCM shows promise for suicide risk management in primary care, with sustained engagement and frequent clinical contact improving outcomes. Results suggest treatment intensity should be tailored to initial depression severity.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10642
Suicide screening, risk assessment, and lethal means counseling during zero suicide implementation
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Jennifer M. Boggs, Julie Richards, Gregory Simon, Erika M. Aguirre-Miyamoto, Lee J. Barton, Arne Beck, Rinad S. Beidas, Cambria Bruschke, Edward T. Buckingham, Stuart Buttlaire, Gregory Clarke, Karen Coleman, Jean P. Flores, Catherine Frank, Robert B. Penfold, Laura Richardson, Jacqueline M. Ryan, Michael Schoenbaum, Stacy Sterling, Christine Stewart, Bobbi Jo H. Yarborough, Hsueh-Han Yeh, Brian Ahmedani
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10643
Suicide: A Silent Contributor to Opioid-Overdose Deaths
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. A. Oquendo, N. D. Volkow
Year: 2018
Abstract: As the toll of opioid-overdose deaths in the United States rises, we face an urgent need for prevention. But preventing such deaths will require a better understanding of the diverse trajectories by which overdoses occur, including the distinction between intentional (suicide) and unintentional (accidental) deaths, be they in patients with chronic pain who overdose on their opioid analgesics or in those with a primary opioid use disorder (OUD). Interventions to prevent overdose deaths in suicidal people will differ from interventions targeted at accidental overdoses. Yet most strategies for reducing opioid-overdose deaths do not include screening for suicide risk, nor do they address the need to tailor interventions for suicidal persons. Moreover, the inaccuracy of available data on the proportion of suicides among opioid-overdose deaths � which are frequently classified as �undetermined� if there is no documented history of depression or a suicide note � hinders deployment of appropriate prevention services.
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
10644
Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule
Type: Web Resource
Authors: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Year: 2003
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
,
Grey Literature See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

10645
Summary of the National Demonstration Project and recommendations for the patient-centered medical home
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. F. Crabtree, P. A. Nutting, W. L. Miller, K. C. Stange, E. E. Stewart, C. R. Jaen
Year: 2010
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: This article summarizes findings from the National Demonstration Project (NDP) and makes recommendations for policy makers and those implementing patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) based on these findings and an understanding of diverse efforts to transform primary care. The NDP was launched in June 2006 as the first national test of a particular PCMH model in a diverse sample of 36 family practices, randomized to facilitated or self-directed groups. An independent evaluation team used a multimethod evaluation strategy, analyzing data from direct observation, depth interviews, e-mail streams, medical record audits, and patient and clinical staff surveys. Peer-reviewed manuscripts from the NDP provide answers to 4 key questions: (1) Can the NDP model be built? (2) What does it take to build the NDP model? (3) Does the NDP model make a difference in quality of care? and (4) Can the NDP model be widely disseminated? We find that although it is feasible to transform independent practices into the NDP conceptualization of a PCMH, this transformation requires tremendous effort and motivation, and benefits from external support. Most practices will need additional resources for this magnitude of transformation. Recommendations focus on the need for the PCMH model to continue to evolve, for delivery system reform, and for sufficient resources for implementing personal and practice development plans. In the meantime, we find that much can be done before larger health system reform.
Topic(s):
Medical Home See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
10646
Summit: Procedures for Medication-Assisted Treatment of Alcohol or Opioid Dependence in Primary Care
Type: Report
Authors: Keith G. Heinzerling, Allison J. Ober, Karen Lamp, David De Vries, Katherine E. Watkins
Year: 2016
Publication Place: Santa Monica, CA
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

10647
Supervised dosing with a long-acting opioid medication in the management of opioid dependence
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. Saulle, S. Vecchi, L. Gowing
Year: 2017
Publication Place: England
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Opioid dependence (OD) is an increasing clinical and public health problem worldwide. International guidelines recommend opioid substitution treatment (OST), such as methadone and buprenorphine, as first-line medication treatment for OD. A negative aspect of OST is that the medication used can be diverted both through sale on the black market, and the unsanctioned use of medications. Daily supervised administration of medications used in OST has the advantage of reducing the risk of diversion, and may promote therapeutic engagement, potentially enhancing the psychosocial aspect of OST, but costs more and is more restrictive on the client than dispensing for off-site consumption. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review is to compare the effectiveness of OST with supervised dosing relative to dispensing of medication for off-site consumption. SEARCH METHODS: We searched in Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Specialised Register and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science from inception up to April 2016. Ongoing and unpublished studies were searched via ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/).All searches included non-English language literature. We handsearched references on topic-related systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), and prospective controlled cohort studies, involving people who are receiving OST (methadone, buprenorphine) and comparing supervised dosing with dispensing of medication to be consumed away from the dispensing point, usually without supervision. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: Six studies (four RCTs and two prospective observational cohort studies), involving 7999 participants comparing supervised OST treatment with unsupervised treatment, met the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was generally moderate across trials, but the results reported on outcomes that we planned to consider were limited. Overall, we judged the quality of the evidence from very low to low for all the outcomes.We found no difference in retention at any duration with supervised compared to unsupervised dosing (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12, 716 participants, four trials, low-quality evidence) or in retention in the shortest follow-up period, three months (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.05; 472 participants, three trials, low-quality evidence). Additional data at 12 months from one observational study found no difference in retention between groups (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.14; n = 300).There was no difference in abstinence at the end of treatment (self-reported drug use) (67% versus 60%, P = 0.33, 293 participants, one trial, very low-quality evidence); and in diversion of medication (5% versus 2%, 293 participants, one trial, very low-quality evidence).Regarding our secondary outcomes, we did not found a difference in the incidence of adverse effects in the supervised compared to unsupervised control group (RR 0.63; 96% CI 0.10 to 3.86; 363 participants, two trials, very low-quality evidence). Data on severity of dependence were very limited (244 participants, one trial) and showed no difference between the two approaches. Data on deaths were reported in two studies. One trial reported two deaths in the supervised group (low-quality evidence), while in the cohort study all-cause mortality was found lower in regular supervision group (crude mortality rate 0.60 versus 0.81 per 100 person-years), although after adjustment insufficient evidence existed to suggest that regular supervision was protective (mortality rate ratio = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.67 to 2.27).No studies reported pain symptoms, drug craving, aberrant opioid-related behaviours, days of unsanctioned opioid use and overdose. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Take-home medication strategies are attractive to treatment services due to lower costs, and place less restrictions on clients, but it is unknown whether they may be associated with increased risk of diversion and unsanctioned use of medication. There is uncertainty about the effects of supervised dosing compared with unsupervised medication due to the low and very low quality of the evidence for the primary outcomes of interest for this review. Data on defined secondary outcomes were similarly limited. More research comparing supervised and take-home medication strategies is needed to support decisions on the relative effectiveness of these strategies. The trials should be designed and conducted with high quality and over a longer follow-up period to support comparison of strategies at different stages of treatment. In particular, there is a need for studies assessing in more detail the risk of diversion and safety outcomes of using supervised OST to manage opioid dependence.
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
10648
Supervised inhalation sites: Preventing overdose and reducing health inequities among people who use drugs
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Alison Lu, Claire Kim, Joseph G. Rosen, Erin Thompson, Jessica Tardif, Ralph Welwean, Ju Nyeong Park
Year: 2023
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
10649
Supervision needs of novice behavioral health clinicians in integrated primary care settings
Type: Journal Article
Authors: N. Schmoyer-Edmiston, G. Kemer, S. A. Ogbeide, M. LaLonde-Pittman, C. Kraft, L. Robins, Wambui Preston
Year: 2025
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10650
Supplemental Appendix S11: Primary Care Referral and Feedback Form
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2010
Publication Place: Elk Grove Village, IL
Topic(s):
General Literature See topic collection
10651
Supply and Distribution of the Behavioral Health Workforce in Rural America. Data Brief #160
Type: Report
Authors: E. H. Larson, D. G. Patterson, L. A. Garberson, C. H. A. Andrilla
Year: 2016
Publication Place: Seattle, WA
Topic(s):
Grey Literature See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

10652
Support for primary care prescribing for adult ADHD in England: national survey
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. Price, K. Becker, J. H. Ward, O. C. Ukoumunne, R. Gudka, A. Salimi, F. Mughal, G. J. Melendez-Torres, J. R. Smith, T. Newlove-Delgado
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
10653
Support for Safe Consumption Sites Among Peer Recovery Coaches
Type: Journal Article
Authors: E. Pasman, S. Brown, E. Agius, S. M. Resko
Year: 2024
Topic(s):
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
,
Education & Workforce See topic collection
10654
Support Models for Addiction Related Treatment (SMART) for pregnant women: Study protocol of a cluster randomized trial of two treatment models for opioid use disorder in prenatal clinics
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A. Forray, A. Mele, N. Byatt, Londono Tobon, K. Gilstad-Hayden, K. Hunkle, S. Hong, H. Lipkind, D. A. Fiellin, K. Callaghan, K. A. Yonkers
Year: 2022
Abstract:

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy increased nearly five-fold over the past decade. Despite this, obstetric providers are less likely to treat pregnant women with medication for OUD than non-obstetric providers (75% vs 91%). A major reason is many obstetricians feel unprepared to prescribe medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Education and support may increase prescribing and overall comfort in delivering care for pregnant women with OUD, but optimal models of education and support are yet to be determined. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We describe the rationale and conduct of a matched-pair cluster randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of two models of support for reproductive health clinicians to provide care for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD. The primary outcomes of this trial are patient treatment engagement and retention in OUD treatment. This study compares two support models: 1) a collaborative care approach, based upon the Massachusetts Office-Based-Opioid Treatment Model, that provides practice-level training and support to providers and patients through the use of care managers, versus 2) a telesupport approach based on the Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, a remote education model that provides mentorship, guided practice, and participation in a learning community, via video conferencing. DISCUSSION: This clustered randomized clinical trial aims to test the effectiveness of two approaches to support practitioners who care for pregnant women with an OUD. The results of this trial will help determine the best model to improve the capacity of obstetrical providers to deliver treatment for OUD in prenatal clinics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov trial registration number: NCT0424039.

Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
10655
Supporting a population health approach in primary care: can electronic health records act as patient registries to support integrated mental health care?
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Sarah Jarmain, Matthew Meyer, Eric Wong
Year: 2025
Topic(s):
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
10656
Supporting Adolescents and Young Adults through Digitally Mediated Type 1 Diabetes Transition Care: A Qualitative Descriptive Study
Type: Journal Article
Authors: N. El-Dassouki, M. Taylor, K. J. Pfisterer, A. Saragadam, M. Nakhla, M. Greenberg, A. Landry, G. Mukerji, E. Mok, A. S. Brazeau, J. C. Kichler, J. A. Cafazzo, R. Shulman
Year: 2024
Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: The time during which adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) transition from pediatric to adult care is associated with blood sugar levels outside of target ranges, care gaps, and an increased risk of acute diabetes complications. The aim of this study was to understand (1) the perspectives of AYAs and providers about the strengths, challenges, and opportunities of transition care and (2) the role of digital technologies in supporting the transition to adult care. Research Design and Methods. We conducted a qualitative descriptive study that involved 43 semistructured interviews in French or English with AYA living with T1D (aged 16-25; n = 22) and pediatric or adult diabetes health care providers (HCPs) (n = 21). RESULTS: We identified three themes. First, transition care is not standardized and varies widely, and there is a lack of awareness of transition guidelines. Second, virtual care can simultaneously hinder and help relationship-building between providers and AYA. Third, AYAs value a holistic approach to care; both HCPs and AYA highlighted the opportunity to better support overall mental wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: The design of digital technologies to support T1D transition care should consider methods for standardizing holistic care delivery and integrating hybrid diabetes care visits to support access to transition care. These findings can inform future transition intervention development that leverages existing transition guidelines, targets holistic care model integration, and considers quantitative diabetes metrics in conjunction with broader life experiences of AYA when providing transition care.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
HIT & Telehealth See topic collection
10657
Supporting Children's Mental Health Needs in Disasters
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. A. Hoffmann, A. Pergjika, K. Burkhart, C. Gable, A. A. Foster, M. Saidinejad, T. Covington, D. Edemba, S. Mullins, M. Schreiber, L. S. Beers
Year: 2025
Abstract:

Public health emergencies, including climate-related and manmade disasters such as active shooter incidents, occur regularly in the United States. A comprehensive approach is needed to ensure that children's mental health needs are adequately addressed following disasters. This article summarizes the latest evidence on how health systems can effectively address children's unique developmental, social, emotional, and behavioral needs in the context of disasters. To do so requires the integration of mental health considerations throughout all disaster phases, including preparedness, response, and recovery. We discuss the role of traditional emergency response systems and emerging models for responding to mental health crises. These include the national children's disaster mental health concept of operations and specific resources such as crisis lines, mobile crisis units, and telemental health. To achieve a broader reach in addressing children's mental health needs during disasters, health systems can foster a "pediatric disaster system of care" by partnering with community touch points such as schools, faith-based organizations, public health, and law enforcement. Unique considerations during disasters are required to maintain access to care for children with preexisting behavioral health conditions. During disasters, attention is needed to promote equitable identification of mental health needs and linkage to services, particularly for minoritized groups and children living in rural, frontier, and high-poverty areas. Strategies to address children's mental health needs during disasters include the provision of psychological first aid, screening for and triaging mental health needs, and stepped care approaches that progressively allocate higher-intensity evidence-based treatments to children with greater and enduring needs.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
10658
Supporting families through the application of a rural pediatric integrated care model
Type: Journal Article
Authors: Amy D. Habeger, Victoria M. Venable
Year: 2018
Publication Place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
10659
Supporting Federally Qualified Health Center Participation in Value-Based Payment to Improve Quality and Achieve Savings
Type: Government Report
Authors: Aditya Mahalingam-Dhingra, Vikki Wachino, Kim Prendergast
Year: 2024
Publication Place: New York, NY
Disclaimer:

This grey literature reference is included in the Academy's Literature Collection in keeping with our mission to gather all sources of information on integration. Grey literature is comprised of materials that are not made available through traditional publishing avenues. Often, the information from unpublished resources can be limited and the risk of bias cannot be determined.

10660
Supporting Mental Health Among STEM Students: The REDFLAGS Model
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. T. Kalkbrenner, N. A. Filoteo Young
Year: 2025
Abstract:

While the future of college student mental health is leaning towards systemic-level integrated behavioral health care models, existing mental health support for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) students remains highly individual. The REDFLAGS Model is a mental health resource comprising an acronym of warning signs that suggest a college student might be struggling with mental distress. The aim of this study was to test the utility of The REDFLAGS Model, with a large sample of STEM students (N = 358). Results revealed support for the latent dimensionality of The REDFLAGS Model among a large sample of STEM students. Results also demonstrated that higher recognition of the items on The REDFLAGS Model as warning signs for mental distress was a significant predictor of peer-to-peer referrals to counseling among STEM students. Additionally, STEM students with help-seeking histories and those who identified as female were more likely to recognize the items on The REDFLAGS Model as warning signs of mental distress than those without help-seeking histories and men, respectively. Collectively, results indicated that The REDFLAGS Model has potential to provide college counselors with an empirically supported framework for supporting STEM student mental health. It is available at no cost and can be shared in print or digital formats.

Topic(s):
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection