Literature Collection

OBJECTIVES: Present analysis of the federal and state regulations that guide The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) operations and core clinical features for direction on behavioral health (BH). DESIGN: Review and synthesize the federal (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) and all publicly available state manuals according to the BH-Serious Illness Care (SIC) model domains. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The 155 PACE organizations operating in 32 states and the District of Columbia. METHODS: A multipronged search was conducted to identify official state and federal manuals guiding the implementation and functions of PACE organizations. The CMS PACE website was used to identify the federal PACE manual. State-level manuals for 32 states with PACE programs were identified through several sources, including official PACE websites, contacts through official websites, the National PACE Association (NPA), and public and academic search engines. The manuals were searched according to the BH-SIC model domains that pertain to integrating BH care with complex care individuals. RESULTS: According to the CMS Manual, the interdisciplinary team is responsible for holistic care of PACE enrollees, but a BH specialist is not a required member. The CMS Manual includes information on BH clinical functions, BH workforce, and structures for outcome measurement, quality, and accountability. Eight of 32 PACE-participating states offer publicly available state PACE manuals; of which 3 offer information on BH clinical functions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Regarding BH, federal and state manual regulations establish limited guidance for comprehensive care service delivery at PACE organizations. The absence of clear directives weakens BH care delivery due to a limiting the ability to develop quality measures and accountability structures. This hinders incentivization and accountability to truly all-inclusive care. Clearer guidelines and regulatory parameters regarding BH care at federal and state levels may enable more PACE organizations to meet rising BH demands of aging communities.

Despite pronounced disparities in mortality and physical health outcomes, no well accepted models exist for integrating primary care with behavioral health for patients with serious mental illness (SMI). This article describes a case study of an enhanced approach to primary care that builds on the patient centered medical home (PCMH) model and adds three additional components: (1) longer and more frequent visits to establish trust and increase adherence, (2) a primary care team that has both the skills to provide effective primary care and the heart to take care of patients with SMI and (3) planned and proactive communication between the behavioral health team and the primary care team.

Mental health comorbidities are highly prevalent and problematic in epilepsy, making it important for neurologists to be equipped to manage their patients' mental health concerns. This article explores the paradigm shift toward integrated mental health care approaches, aiming to educate early-career neurologists on their role within epilepsy care. We focus on depression and anxiety, how they present in epilepsy, and the role of integrated mental health care in managing these comorbidities. Key areas include the neurologist's role in identifying mental health issues through patient discussions and screening tools, and the basics of neurologist-led management. This covers the selection and adjustment of antiseizure medications and the use of psychopharmacology. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of providing psychoeducation and promoting healthy lifestyle choices that support mental well-being. Finally, we discuss the neurologist's role in facilitating referrals to mental health specialists, including information about the role of psychological interventions and psychiatry. This article aims to provide foundational knowledge to encourage early-career neurologists to actively engage in integrated mental health care approaches with their patients. This care can be flexible in how it incorporates different modalities and is tailored to local resources. It does not have to be extensive but should be meaningful enough to identify mental health concerns and facilitate patient access to appropriate resources and care.

Office-Based Opioid Treatment (OBOT) with buprenorphine has been available since 2000; however, many barriers to OBOT within primary care exist, and only 3.6% of family medicine physicians are waivered to prescribe buprenorphine.1 We have successfully integrated OBOT into our primary care practice, expanding access to treatment for opioid use disorder.

To address shifting demographic trends in health care, this guide offers an approach to defining the needs of members with limited English proficiency and developing strategies to meet their communication needs.

Background/Objectives: People with a severe mental illness die much earlier than the rest of the population from a preventable physical illness. Annual health checks are a way of assessing the person to then offer the appropriate interventions. Integrated Care Northampton, England used the long-term plan baseline funding allocated to them from the government department that commissions primary care services, to implement a local enhanced service. Their aim was to provide a person-centred physical health check that people with severe mental illness feel comfortable, confident, and able to engage with. Methods: Wellbeing Organisation Research Training Hub Northampton were commissioned by Integrated Care Northampton to provide training, support, and evaluate the locally enhanced service. Training was provided by training trainers who then offered one-to-one support to those delivering health checks in practice. Providers of the health checks could also access individual support from Wellbeing Organisation Research Training Hub staff. Patient data were collected via a template that is part of usual practice. Questionnaires were used to evaluate the education of staff, the delivery of health checks, and the impact on people with severe mental illness. Results: Training was well received but most of the trainers did not continue in their role. The project was successful in highlighting the physical health needs of people with severe mental illness and monitoring in primary care increased. Though methods were put in place to evaluate the delivery of health checks and their impact on people with severe mental illness, these were not utilised by the service. Conclusions: This paper emphasises how difficult it is to implement a new service and evaluate it successfully. Future projects should prioritise measuring the quality of the service.