Literature Collection

Healthcare systems in Canada are under pressure and require change-the status quo is no longer fit for purpose, if it ever was. Innovation is often held up as a cure for what ails us, but shiny new things or novel technologies alone have not been enough. This article will explore the concepts of differentiation and integration as being important drivers in the evolution of living organisms, ecosystems, and complex human organizations. The implications of this deep pattern of systems change are essential to understanding the roles of specialization in medicine, and optionality in primary care. Specifically, overspecialization without attention to the principles of healthcare integration can lead to fragmentation of care and worse patient outcomes. Finally, this article will describe some practical examples of system integration as innovation in the form of better public health and care delivery connections, health homes, and community care coordination centres.

OBJECTIVES: With the increasing rates of opioid overdose deaths in the United States, barriers to treatment access for patients seeking medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), and challenges of initiating buprenorphine in patients who use fentanyl, it is essential to explore novel approaches to expanding access to methadone treatment. An opioid treatment program (OTP) and a federally qualified health center (FQHC) partnered to develop and implement an innovative integrated methadone and primary care treatment model. The process for integrating an OTP and FQHC to provide methadone treatment in the primary care setting will be discussed. METHODS: An OTP methadone dispensing site was co-located in the FQHC, utilizing a staffing matrix built on the expertise of each stakeholder. The OTP managed DEA and state regulatory processes, whereas the FQHC physicians provided medical treatment, including methadone treatment protocols, treatment plans, and primary care. Patient demographics, medical history, and retention data for those who entered the program between January 2021 and February 2023 were collected through chart review and analyzed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 288 OTP-FHQC patients were enrolled during the study. Retention rates in methadone treatment at 90 and 180 days were similar to partner clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Collaboration between FQHCs and OTPs is operationally feasible and can be achieved utilizing the current staffing model of the FQHC and OTP. This model can increase access to treatment for OUD and primary care for an urban, underserved patient population.

INTRODUCTION: Women who attend alcohol and other drug (AOD) services experience higher rates of unintended pregnancy, and access less contraception, than the general population. This study aims to observe contraceptive initiation and use after contraception services were offered at metropolitan and regional AOD services. METHODS: Clinical staff were provided contraception education. One hundred women aged 16-49 were recruited from two services between 2017 and 2021. Women completed a questionnaire on their obstetrics and gynaecological history, pregnancy plans and contraception use. Women were provided education on contraception options and offered referral to a contraception pathway. The primary outcome was initiation of highly reliable contraception; secondary outcomes were the types of contraception initiated, and contraception use and pregnancy at 12 months. We compared the initiation of contraception across the two study sites. RESULTS: At baseline, 91% of women were not planning a pregnancy within 12 months, with 21% of these using highly reliable contraception. Of all women not planning a pregnancy, 28% initiated highly reliable contraception via the pathway (2% metropolitan, 51% regional, p < 0.001), with intrauterine devices being the most frequent method initiated (15%). At 12 months, 44% were using highly reliable contraception and 15% had recorded pregnancies. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Contraception pathways for women in AOD treatment can improve initiation of highly reliable methods of contraception, although pregnancy rates were still high and there were large differences between the study sites. Care navigation and clinical champions are some potential facilitators to contraception access, and understanding additional barriers to access may be useful.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric specialist shortages and rapidly rising autism prevalence rates have compelled primary care clinicians to consider playing a greater role in the autism diagnostic process. The ECHO Autism: Early Diagnosis Program (EDx) prepares clinicians to screen, evaluate, differentiate, diagnose, and provide longitudinal care for children with autism in primary care settings. Canvas Dx is a prescription-only Software as a Medical Device designed to support clinical diagnosis or rule out of autism, including in primary care settings. It is authorized by the Food and Drug Administration for use, in conjunction with clinical judgment, in 18- to 72-month-olds with indicators of developmental delay. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feasibility and impact of integrating the device into the ECHO Autism: EDx workflow. Time from the first clinical question of developmental delay to autism diagnosis is the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints explore clinician and caregiver experience of device use. METHODS: Children aged 18 to 72 months with concern for developmental delay indicated by either a caregiver or health professionals were eligible to participate in this prospective observational study. Experienced ECHO Autism: EDx clinicians were recruited to evaluate the inclusion of the device as part of their diagnostic evaluations. Outcome data were collected via a combination of electronic questionnaires, standard clinical care record reviews, and analysis of device outputs. Institutional review board approval was provided by the University of Missouri-Columbia (project number 2075722). RESULTS: Eighty children and 7 clinicians completed the study. On average, time from clinical concern at study enrollment to final autism diagnosis was 39.22 days, compared to 180- to 264-day waits at adjacent specialist referral centers. The vast majority (93%, 50/54) of caregivers reported being satisfied with the ECHO Autism: EDx plus device evaluation their child received and endorsed that they would recommend it to others and that they felt comfortable using the device. The device produced determinate autism predictions or rule-outs for 52.5% of participants, and in all cases, these were consistent with the final clinical determination. Participating clinicians reported that device use was feasible and reduced several challenges associated with their previous diagnostic process; however, they noted it did not obviate the need for additional structured observation in every case. CONCLUSIONS: The ECHO Autism: EDx plus device workflow offers considerable time savings compared to specialty center referral and was strongly endorsed by caregiver participants. Embedding the device into the ECHO Autism: EDx workflow was feasible and helped streamline several workflow efficiencies. Clinicians still utilized their training and application and interpretation of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria when formulating the diagnosis for indeterminate cases.