Literature Collection

INTRODUCTION: Purnell's Model for Cultural Competence outlines that cultural competence is essential for bridging the gap between health care providers and patients from diverse cultural backgrounds.' METHODOLOGY: This study followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines, focusing on studies involving nurses, nursing students, and educators using Purnell's Model. Literature was searched across six databases up to July 2024. RESULTS: From 834 records, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria. The primary themes identified were "Cultural competence in health care" and "Nursing interventions and patient relationships." Subtopics included Cultural health care practices, Patient-centric nursing, holistic and culturally sensitive care, and integrated care and education. These subtopics provide a nuanced understanding of cultural competence application across various settings. DISCUSSION: Findings highlight the importance of integrating cultural competence training to reduce health care disparities, improve patient-provider communication, and enhance the efficacy of nursing interventions in diverse populations. Incorporating these aspects into education and practice is crucial for achieving cultural competence in nursing.

Background: Interprofessional collaboration is vital for comprehensive, patient-centered care. Despite growing recognition of oral-systemic health links, the integration of dentists into healthcare teams remains limited. This scoping review mapped existing evidence on dental professionals' roles within interprofessional healthcare, identifying key benefits, barriers, and facilitators. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science identified English-language studies (2014 to 2024) focused on collaboration between dental and non-dental providers. Studies addressing oral-systemic health without team-based integration were excluded. Screening and data charting followed the PRISMA-ScR framework using JBI data extraction and critical appraisal tools. Data were synthesized thematically by collaboration model, outcomes, and influencing factors. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Integrating dental professionals into healthcare teams improved patient outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction. Effective models included nurse practitioner-dentist partnerships and medical-dental collaboration in pediatrics and chronic disease care. Barriers included poor communication, lack of interoperable electronic health records, role ambiguity, and limited interprofessional training. Key facilitators were supportive policies, integrated care structures, professional education, and strong team communication. Conclusions: Integrating dentists into interprofessional teams enhances healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. However, significant barriers remain. Addressing communication gaps, implementing shared health records, and expanding interprofessional education are essential steps toward more cohesive care. Future research should evaluate scalable integration frameworks and incorporate patient perspectives to inform team-based care.

Digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia has been developed to increase capacity and scalability for patients with insomnia, but implementation in primary care remains limited. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the implementation of digital insomnia therapy into primary care practice for patients with insomnia. We conducted a single-arm feasibility trial of digital behavioural therapy for insomnia (SleepFix) providing sleep restriction therapy with insomnia patients in primary care. Healthcare professionals (comprising General Practitioners, community pharmacists and nurses) were enrolled into the trial and, when deemed clinically appropriate, prescribed SleepFix to patients with insomnia. The primary outcome was uptake assessed by the number of downloads of SleepFix. Interviews with primary care healthcare professionals explored their attitudes towards implementing/using insomnia digital therapeutics in clinical practice, and patients about their experiences with SleepFix. Insomnia symptoms, mood and sleep quality were measured before and after the trial. This trial was prospectively registered (ACTRN12620000055909). Thirty healthcare professionals and 105 patients were enrolled into the trial. Fourteen healthcare professionals administered at least one insomnia digital therapeutic prescription between November 2021 and March 2022. Fifty patients downloaded and used SleepFix (47.6% uptake). In post-trial interviews, healthcare professionals felt they could incorporate digital sleep health into clinical practice and patients found SleepFix acceptable. There were significant improvements in insomnia symptoms, mood and sleep quality at week 6 (all p < 0.05). This trial shows a real-world implementation of a digital insomnia therapy into primary care that could provide a framework for prescribing digital sleep interventions.