Literature Collection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The rising prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) and related complications in North America coupled with limited numbers of specialists in addiction medicine has led to large gaps in treatment. Primary care providers (PCPs) are ideally suited to diagnose and care for people with OUD and are increasingly being called upon to improve access to care. This review will highlight the recent literature pertaining to the care of patients with OUD by PCPs. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of patients with OUD in primary care practice is increasing, and models of office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) are evolving to meet local needs of both ambulatory practices and patients. OBOT has been shown to increase access to care and demonstrates comparable outcomes when compared to more specialty-driven care. OBOT is an effective means of increasing access to care for patients with OUD. The ideal structure of OBOT depends on local factors. Future research must explore ways to increase the identification and diagnosis of patients with OUD, improve treatment retention rates, reduce stigma, and promote interdisciplinary approaches to care.

Adolescence is a time of increased vulnerability to mental health conditions, which may necessitate hospitalization. This study sought to identify and characterize patterns of adolescent (re-)hospitalizations. The one-year (re-)hospitalization patterns of 233 adolescents were analyzed. The sequences of hospitalization and discharge was examined using cluster analyses. Results revealed five distinct (re-)hospitalization patterns or clusters: Cluster A represented brief hospitalizations with 56 cases (24.03%) averaging 7.71 days; cluster B consisted of repetitive short hospitalizations involving 97 cases (41.63%) with an average of 19.90 days; cluster C encompassed repetitive medium hospitalizations included 66 cases (28.33%) averaging 41.33 days; cluster D included long hospitalizations with 11 cases (4.72%) and an average of 99.36 days; cluster E depicted chronic hospitalizations, accounting for 3 cases (1.29%) with an average stay of 138.67 days. Despite no age-based differences across clusters, distinctions were noted in terms of sex, diagnoses, and severity of clinical and psychosocial difficulties. The study identified characteristics of both regular and atypical adolescent hospitalization users, emphasizing the distribution of hospitalization days and their associated clinical attributes. Such insights are pivotal for enhancing the organization of child and adolescent mental health services to cater to the growing care requirements of this age group.

To mitigate barriers to care among youth (12-25 years), community-based organizations have increasingly integrated peer support as a complement to clinical mental health care; however, information regarding the integration process is lacking. To explore organizational perspectives regarding the contexts and mechanisms underlying integration of peer support for youth accessing mental health services from community-based, youth-serving organizations. Representatives from community-based youth-serving organizations completed a survey describing the contexts in which they are located and their experiences integrating peer support. Text responses were analyzed using directed content analysis. 21 organizations serving youth aged 11-29 years responded. Three generic categories were identified: 1) Context is key and safe environments, 2) Supportive organizations and valuing lived experience, 3) Benefits for peer support providers and receivers and purposeful integration into the organization. Peer support integration requires valuing of the lived experience of peers and creation of a safe organizational environment.

BACKGROUND: Demand for paediatric allergy services has risen significantly over the past 20 years. National health datasets suggest almost 40% of children have an allergy diagnosis. Existing service standards from the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) have focused on specific disease care pathways and the interface between primary and secondary care services. Given strategic changes to NHS children and young people's services, we undertook a collaborative project between RCPCH and the British Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI) to define service priorities for Paediatric Allergy Care accreditation in the UK. METHODS: A BSACI working group developed 29 potential service standards. A consultation was then undertaken amongst BSACI members to identify indicative priorities. Potential standards were then prioritised using methodology adapted from the James Lind Alliance, by 24 stakeholders representing patients/patient groups (9), commissioners (2) and healthcare professionals (13). RESULTS: Seventeen strategic priorities were identified, under the following 6 themes: service delivery, prevention, diagnostics, management, communication, maintaining standards/education. These included: setting a minimum staffing mix for multidisciplinary teams providing paediatric allergy care (medical specialist(s), specialist nurse, dietitian, health psychologist); prompt recognition and management of complex, multisystem allergic disease; working within a regional network to ensure access to specialist paediatric allergy services; use of integrated care pathways and supporting primary care accordingly; supporting early access to interventions proven to reduce the risk of atopic disease (with consideration to potential barriers to access, including language, cultural, socioeconomic factors and other communication barriers); offering a referral pathway for disease-modifying treatment where appropriate and effective transitioning to adult care. CONCLUSIONS: These priorities form a basis for the delivery of high-quality care to children and young people affected by allergic disease.