Literature Collection

Collection Insights

10K+

References

9K+

Articles

1400+

Grey Literature

4500+

Opioids & SU

The Literature Collection contains over 10,000 references for published and grey literature on the integration of behavioral health and primary care. Learn More

Use the Search feature below to find references for your terms across the entire Literature Collection, or limit your searches by Authors, Keywords, or Titles and by Year, Type, or Topic. View your search results as displayed, or use the options to: Show more references per page; Sort references by Title or Date; and Refine your search criteria. Expand an individual reference to View Details. Full-text access to the literature may be available through a link to PubMed, a DOI, or a URL. References may also be exported for use in bibliographic software (e.g., EndNote, RefWorks, Zotero).

Year
Sort by
Order
Show
171 Results
121
Population-based care of depression: Effective disease management strategies to decrease prevalence
Type: Journal Article
Authors: W. Katon, M. Von Korff, E. Lin, J. Unutzer, G. Simon, E. Walker, E. Ludman, T. Bush
Year: 1997
Publication Place: UNITED STATES
Abstract: This paper reviews the concepts of population-based care and disease management of major depression. Population-based care and disease management strategies motivated by health care reform provide approaches for organizing health services to lower the prevalence of common medical and psychiatric illnesses in primary care populations. We apply these concepts to the organization of services for patients with major depression.
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
,
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
122
Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders, 1990 to 2003
Type: Journal Article
Authors: R. C. Kessler, O. Demler, R. G. Frank, M. Olfson, H. A. Pincus, E. E. Walters, P. Wang, K. B. Wells, A. M. Zaslavsky
Year: 2005
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Although the 1990s saw enormous change in the mental health care system in the United States, little is known about changes in the prevalence or rate of treatment of mental disorders. METHODS: We examined trends in the prevalence and rate of treatment of mental disorders among people 18 to 54 years of age during roughly the past decade. Data from the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) were obtained in 5388 face-to-face household interviews conducted between 1990 and 1992, and data from the NCS Replication were obtained in 4319 interviews conducted between 2001 and 2003. Anxiety disorders, mood disorders, and substance-abuse disorders that were present during the 12 months before the interview were diagnosed with the use of the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV). Treatment for emotional disorders was categorized according to the sector of mental health services: psychiatry services, other mental health services, general medical services, human services, and complementary-alternative medical services. RESULTS: The prevalence of mental disorders did not change during the decade (29.4 percent between 1990 and 1992 and 30.5 percent between 2001 and 2003, P=0.52), but the rate of treatment increased. Among patients with a disorder, 20.3 percent received treatment between 1990 and 1992 and 32.9 percent received treatment between 2001 and 2003 (P<0.001). Overall, 12.2 percent of the population 18 to 54 years of age received treatment for emotional disorders between 1990 and 1992 and 20.1 percent between 2001 and 2003 (P<0.001). Only about half those who received treatment had disorders that met diagnostic criteria for a mental disorder. Significant increases in the rate of treatment (49.0 percent between 1990 and 1992 and 49.9 percent between 2001 and 2003) were limited to the sectors of general medical services (2.59 times as high in 2001 to 2003 as in 1990 to 1992), psychiatry services (2.17 times as high), and other mental health services (1.59 times as high) and were independent of the severity of the disorder and of the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increase in the rate of treatment, most patients with a mental disorder did not receive treatment. Continued efforts are needed to obtain data on the effectiveness of treatment in order to increase the use of effective treatments.
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
125
Primary care behavioral health consultation reduces Depression levels among mood-disordered patients
Type: Journal Article
Authors: B. McFeature, T. W. Pierce
Year: 2012
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
126
Primary care clinicians evaluate integrated and referral models of behavioral health care for older adults: Results from a multisite effectiveness trial (PRISM-e)
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. J. Gallo, C. Zubritsky, J. Maxwell, M. Nazar, H. R. Bogner, L. M. Quijano, H. J. Syropoulos, K. L. Cheal, H. Chen, H. Sanchez, J. Dodson, S. E. Levkoff, PRISM-E Investigators
Year: 2004
Publication Place: United States
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that integrated behavioral health services for older adults in primary care improves health outcomes. No study, however, has asked the opinions of clinicians whose patients actually experienced integrated rather than enhanced referral care for depression and other conditions. METHOD: The Primary Care Research in Substance Abuse and Mental Health for the Elderly (PRISM-E) study was a randomized trial comparing integrated behavioral health care with enhanced referral care in primary care settings across the United States. Primary care clinicians at each participating site were asked whether integrated or enhanced referral care was preferred across a variety of components of care. Managers also completed questionnaires related to the process of care at each site. RESULTS: Almost all primary care clinicians (n = 127) stated that integrated care led to better communication between primary care clinicians and mental health specialists (93%), less stigma for patients (93%), and better coordination of mental and physical care (92%). Fewer thought that integrated care led to better management of depression (64%), anxiety (76%), or alcohol problems (66%). At sites in which the clinicians were rated as participating in mental health care, integrated care was highly rated as improving communication between specialists in mental health and primary care. CONCLUSIONS: Among primary care clinicians who cared for patients that received integrated care or enhanced referral care, integrated care was preferred for many aspects of mental health care.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Key & Foundational See topic collection
127
Primary care research priorities identified and shared with stakeholders
Type: Journal Article
Authors: NAPCRG's Research Advocacy Committee
Year: 2014
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
128
Primary care-based interventions to prevent illicit drug use in children, adolescents, and young adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2020
Topic(s):
Financing & Sustainability See topic collection
,
Healthcare Disparities See topic collection
,
Key & Foundational See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
129
PRISM-E: comparison of integrated care and enhanced specialty referral models in depression outcomes
Type: Journal Article
Authors: D. D. Krahn, S. J. Bartels, E. Coakley, D. W. Oslin, H. Chen, J. McIntyre, H. Chung, J. Maxwell, J. Ware, S. E. Levkoff
Year: 2006
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
130
Promoting self-management in diabetes: Efficacy of a collaborative care approach.
Type: Journal Article
Authors: William Sieber, Alita Newsome, Dustin Lillie
Year: 2012
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
131
Public Stigma of Mental Illness in the United States: A Systematic Literature Review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: A.M. Parcesepe
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
133
QT interval screening in methadone maintenance treatment: report of a SAMHSA expert panel
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. A. Martin, A. Campbell, T. Killip, M. Kotz, M. J. Krantz, M. J. Kreek, B. A. McCarroll, D. Mehta, J. T. Payte, B. Stimmel, T. Taylor, M. C. Haigney, B. B. Wilford, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Year: 2011
Publication Place: England
Abstract: In an effort to enhance patient safety in opioid treatment programs, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Saervices Administration convened a multi-disciplinary Expert Panel on the Cardiac Effects of Methadone. Panel members (Appendix A) reviewed the literature, regulatory actions, professional guidances, and opioid treatment program experiences regarding adverse cardiac events associated with methadone. The Panel concluded that, to the extent possible, every opioid treatment program should have a universal Cardiac Risk Management Plan (incorporating clinical assessment, electrocardiogram assessment, risk stratification, and prevention of drug interactions) for all patients and should strongly consider patient-specific risk minimization strategies (such as careful patient monitoring, obtaining electrocardiograms as indicated by a particular patient's risk profile, and adjusting the methadone dose as needed) for patients with identified risk factors for adverse cardiac events. The Panel also suggested specific modifications to informed consent documents, patient education, staff education, and methadone protocols.
Topic(s):
Education & Workforce See topic collection
,
Key & Foundational See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
134
Quality of life as an outcome of opioid use disorder treatment: A systematic review
Type: Journal Article
Authors: J. W. Bray, B. Aden, A. A. Eggman, L. Hellerstein, E. Wittenberg, B. Nosyk, J. C. Stribling, B. R. Schackman
Year: 2017
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
,
Key & Foundational See topic collection
,
Measures See topic collection
,
Opioids & Substance Use See topic collection
135
Quality standards for child and adolescent mental health in primary care
Type: Journal Article
Authors: K. Sayal, M. Amarasinghe, S. Robotham, C. Coope, M. Ashworth, C. Day, A. Tylee, E. Simonoff
Year: 2012
Abstract: ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Child and adolescent mental health problems are common in primary healthcare settings. However, few parents of children with mental health problems express concerns about these problems during consultations. Based on parental views, we aimed to create quality of care measures for child and adolescent mental health in primary care and develop consensus about the importance of these quality standards within primary care. METHODS: Quality Standards were developed using an iterative approach involving four phases: 1) 34 parents with concerns about their child's emotional health or behaviour were recruited from a range of community settings including primary care practices to participate in focus group discussions, followed by validation groups or interviews. 2) Preliminary Quality Standards were generated that fully represented the parents' experiences and were refined following feedback from an expert parent nominal group. 3) 55 experts, including parents and representatives from voluntary organisations, across five panels participated in a modified two-stage Delphi study to develop consensus on the importance of the Quality Standards. The panels comprised general practitioners, other community-based professionals, child and adolescent psychiatrists, other child and adolescent mental health professionals and public health and policy specialists. 4) The final set of Quality Standards was piloted with 52 parents in primary care. RESULTS: In the Delphi process, all five panels agreed that 10 of 31 Quality Standards were important. Although four panels rated 25-27 statements as important, the general practitioner panel rated 12 as important. The final 10 Quality Standards reflected healthcare domains involving access, confidentiality for young people, practitioner knowledge, communication, continuity of care, and referral to other services. Parents in primary care agreed that all 10 statements were important. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to develop a set of Quality Standards to assess mental healthcare provision for children and adolescents seen within primary healthcare services. Primary care practitioners should be aware of parental perspectives about quality of care as these may influence helpseeking behaviours.
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
136
Recognition of anxiety disorders by the general practitioner: results from the DASMAP Study
Type: Journal Article
Year: 2012
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
137
Redesigning Primary Care: A Strategic Vision To Improve Value By Organizing Around Patients' Needs
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. E. Porter, E. A. Pabo, T. H. Lee
Year: 2013
Topic(s):
Key & Foundational See topic collection
139
Review of Integrated behavioral health in primary care: Evaluating the evidence, identifying the essentials
Type: Journal Article
Authors: M. E. Vogel
Year: 2015
Publication Place: United States
Topic(s):
Healthcare Policy See topic collection
,
Key & Foundational See topic collection